******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE ) COMPANY ) Complainant ) ) File No. IC- 92-05769 v. ) ) WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ) Respondent ) ) ) In the Matter of ) ) WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ) NAL/Acct. No. 216E10001 ) ) and ) ) MANILA PENINSULA HOTEL ) NAL/Acct. No. 216E10002 Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ) ORDER Adopted: September 30, 1998 Released: October 5, 1998 By the Commission: 1. On January 23, 1993, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability that ordered: (1) World Communications, Inc. (WorldCom) and the Manila Peninsula Hotel (Hotel) to pay forfeitures of $200,000, each, for reselling international private lines (IPLs) without authorization under Section 214(a) of the Communications Act; and (2) WorldCom to pay an additional $6,000 for failing to adhere to restrictions in its tariff on the use of international private lines in violation of Section 203(c) of the Communications Act. The Commission took this action in response to an informal complaint filed by the Philippine Long Distance Company (PLDT) which alleged that the Hotel charged one of its guests for making two calls to the United States on January 24, 1992, over private lines provided to the Hotel by Globe-Mackay Cable and Radio Corporation on the Philippine end and WorldCom on the U.S. end, and that the Hotel continued to resell IPLs in violation of the Communications Act and our rules. We now conclude that there is insufficient evidence to order forfeitures against WorldCom and the Hotel. 2. For the foregoing reason, we grant WorldCom's request that we cancel the forfeitures against itself and the Hotel. ORDERING CLAUSE 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.106(j) of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.106(j), the forfeitures in the above-captioned NAL are cancelled. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary