******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) IB Docket No. 96-261 International Settlement Rates ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ESTABLISH COMMENT SCHEDULE Adopted: July 29, 1997 Released: July 29, 1997 By the Chief, International Bureau: 1.In response to our Order Granting Confidential Treatment of call distribution data filed under seal by AT&T in the above-captioned proceeding, ABS-CBN Telecom, North America, Inc. ("ABS-CBN Telecom") has filed a motion to establish a comment schedule for that data. Finding that ABS-CBN Telecom has not shown good cause for establishing a comment schedule, we deny its motion. 2.In its comments, ABS-CBN Telecom had requested that call distribution data be placed on the record in the above-captioned proceeding. Although we believed that U.S. international carriers would likely have call distribution data on their U.S.-originated traffic and foreign carriers receiving settlement payments would likely have the call distribution data on the U.S.-originated traffic that they terminate, we welcomed AT&T's filing of such call distribution data collected on its customers' calls to supplement the record. Recognizing that "AT&T's call distribution data could provide competitors with competitively-sensitive market and cost structure information about AT&T's operations," we allowed AT&T to make the information available to all parties of record pursuant to a Confidentiality Agreement that AT&T had attached to its motion. ABS-CBN Telecom requests that we establish a further comment schedule in the above-captioned proceeding for comments on the AT&T call distribution data. 3.ABS-CBN Telecom believes that we should establish a further comment schedule in part because of "the expected scope of the new AT&T data, which . . . cover up to ninety days of telephone call volumes, segmented by calling hour for at least fifty-six countries." ABS-CBN Telecom expressed this concern in its motion without taking the opportunity to review first the information that AT&T has made available. Because of the confidential treatment granted AT&T's call distribution data, we are not at liberty to discuss details about that data. Our review, though, shows that AT&T's filing does not contain voluminous data -- generally one to five tables per country. AT&T has presented the data of the distribution of calls among the relevant rate bands in a concise, easy-to-understand manner. As a result, we find that ABS-CBN Telecom has failed to show good cause for establishing a schedule of August 15, 1997 for initial comments and August 22, 1997 for reply comments on AT&T's confidential call distribution data. Interested parties may file comments on this data until the Sunshine Period in the above- captioned proceeding begins. 4.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  4(i), and Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.51, 0.261, that ABS-CBN Telecom's Motion IS DENIED. 5.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall be effective upon adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter F. Cowhey Chief, International Bureau