WPC  2BEJ Courier X4#Xj\  P6G;9XP##|j PCL) (Additional)HL4MPCAD.PRSx  @\ vX@2!6KF Z#|j "i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+99999999S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""I\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\"i~'^DO]uuĶOOOu=O=AuuuuuuuuuuAAgרOYͨۨOAOkuOgugugOuuAAuAuuuuOYAuuuugp/p~O=~kOOO=OOOOOOOOuAggggg͘gggggOAOAOAOAuuuuuuuuuuguruuuuggggg~ggggguuu~u~uOAOuOOOu~~uA]OOAuuuuuͨOOOYYY~bAkuuuuuuۨ~ggguOuYOu=uuN*NWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTTkuOguuuuuAKuFKuFOOgguPPuu叱T錌TƒOguF"u錇~u匌u2 0K(K*=-K-"i~'^:DpddȨDDDdp4D48ddddddddddDDpppd|Ld|pȐD8DtdDdpXpXDdp8Dp8pdppXLDpdddXP,PhD4htDDD4DDDDDDdDp8dddddȐXXXXXJ8J8J8J8pddddppppddpddddzpdddXXhXXXXXdddhdptL8LpLDLpphhp8ZDP8pppddƐXXXpLpLpLphfDtppppppȐhXXXpDppLDd4ddC6CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxHjdDdddddd8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d"""i~'^09FSS999Sq+9+/SSSSSSSSSS99qqqSggnxggxx9In]nxgxgS]xgg]]?/?FS9SSISI/SS//I/xSSSS??/SInII?C/CZ9+ZF999+999999S9S/gSgSgSgSgSnnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/nSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]IgSxSxSxS]IxSgSgSgSgSnInInZnIxdgIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999SSZZnI]/]<]9]5]/nSanSnSxSxSng?g?g?S?S?S?ZZ]<]/]FxSxSxSxSxSxSn]Z]?]?]?xS]9nSS?]9]Sd+SS8%8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNa݅@  I.   X(# SubheadingSubheading"0\ E A.  2G#^3E$dE%E& GFOOTNOTEFootnote - Appearance#PHIGHLIGHT 1Italics and Boldldedd$+. DRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and Date% X =8` (#FDRAFTă r  ` (#=D3 1, 43 12pt (Z)(PC-8))T2Dă  ӟDRAFT OFFTurn Draft Style off&@@    2K'XG(1,H)1]I*1JHEADERHeader A - Appearance'LETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5( 3'3'Standard'3'3StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 ;   LEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5)f 3'3'Standard'A'AStandardZ K e6VE L"nu;   LETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11*L 3'3'Standard3'3'StandardZ K e6VE L"nU9   2iN+1K,n"M-XM.MLEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14+ 3'3'StandardA'A'StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 119   TITLETitle of a Document,K\ * ăFOOTERFooter A - Appearanced-BLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indented.N X 2Q/iN0dO1jhO2OHEADING 33rd Heading Level/| XHIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold Large0B*d. HIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscored1 V -qLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/margins2u H XX  3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"nE9    * 3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3' II"n"Tv3'StandarddZ K e VE L"nU9 Ѓ   2W3E#R4-hS58T68UINVOICE FEETFee Amount for Math Invoice3 ,, $0$0  MEMORANDUMMemo Page Format4D.   ! M E M O R A N D U M ă r  y<N dddy   INVOICE EXPSEExpense Subtotals for Math Invoice5:A ,p, $0$00INVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macro6z 4p, $0$002Y77W8XX9[0Y:[YINVOICE HEADRHeading Portion of Math Invoice7+C`*   4X 99L$0 **(  ӧ XX NORMALReturn to Normal Typestyle8SMALLSmall Typestyle9FINEFine Typestyle:2\;[Z<[sZ=[Z>)[LARGELarge Typestyle;EXTRA LARGEExtra Large Typestyle<VERY LARGEVery Large Typestyle=ENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Header>+w ,,EnvelopeZ K e VE L"n,,EnvelopeLarge, Italicized and Under;    ,, 88+  `   2^?X\@X6]A]B.^MACNormal?,.1@dfStyle 14Swiss 8 Pt Without MarginsA$$D Co> PfQ  )a [ PfQO Style 12Dutch Italics 11.5B$$F )^ `> XifQ  )a [ PfQO 2sfC_DlcEKeFeStyle 11Initial Codes for Advanced IICJ )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 ! )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   x )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide   j-n )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  jBX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 3oDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/TabsD )a [ PfQO  ddn  # c0*b, oT9 !Style 4 PSwiss 8 Point with MarginsEDq Co> PfQ  dddd  #  Style 1.5Dutch Roman 11.5 FontF4h )a [ PfQO  dddn 2iG|fH!gIgJahStyle 2Dutch Italic 11.5G$ )^ `> XifQ Style 5Dutch Bold 18 PointH$RH$L T~> pfQ_  )a [ PfQO Style 7Swiss 11.5I$$V )ao> PfQ ]  )a [ PfQO Style 6Dutch Roman 14 PointJ$$N w [ PfQ   )a [ PfQO 2\}K3iL:nMAsNFxStyle 10oInitial Codes for AdvancedK U )a [ PfQK  dddn  ##  [[ b, oT9 !b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  QN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 8PfInitial Codes for BeginninggLi )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9  [ &e )^ `> XifQ ` Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   d )^ `> XifQ Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jH )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  j )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 9Initial Codes for IntermediateM )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 Њ [ e )^ `> XifQ ` Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   3 )^ `> XifQ Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jf )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc.`+ >Page  jX )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 UpdateInitial Codes for Update ModuleN )a [ PfQK  dddn  #  [ X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Legal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide   Q" )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`7 CPage  jN~ )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 29Op}Pq}Qeo~Re~Document[8]'Eg%Document StyleE O  O g% W4I O gO` ` ` Document[4]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gP  . Document[6]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gQ  Document[5]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gR  2SkTpUnVDocument[2]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gS*    Document[7]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gT  ` ` ` Right Par[1]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O gU8 @  Right Par[2]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O gVA@` ` `  ` ` ` 2iẂXbYZDocument[3]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O gW0     Right Par[3]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O gXJ` ` ` @  ` ` ` Right Par[4]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O gYS` ` `  @  Right Par[5]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O gZ\` ` `  @hhh hhh 2[\Z]"^Right Par[6]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O g[e` ` `  hhh@ hhh Right Par[7]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O g\n` ` `  hhh@  Right Par[8]Eg%Right-Aligned Paragraph NumbersO g% W4I O g]w` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp Document[1]'Eg%Document Style W4A O g% W4I O g^F    ׃  2_߇`dabTechnical[5]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g_&!"  . Technical[6]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O g`&#$  . Technical[2]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O ga*%&    Technical[3]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O gb''(   2cLdefTechnical[4]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O gc&)*   Technical[1]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O gd4+$,     Technical[7]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O ge&-.  . Technical[8]Eg%Technical Document Style O g% W4I O gf&/0  . 2ŐǧhKi~ލji\footnote tex#g'p #FxX  Pg9CXP#referenceh;#FxX  Pg9CXP#itemizeX1i&V 8F ` hp xr#FxX  Pg9CXP#header2jI ` hp x`    #FxX  Pg9CXP# 2ʓk lm}ŒnBCitatorFormat Secretary's Citator Output FilekW r5-#d6X@`7Ͽ@# XX  X B r5-S  BFormat DownloadFormat Downloaded Documentliޛ r5- XX    \ #d6X@`7Ͽ@#a1Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Fm$ a2Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Fn/ 2opq-r֕a3Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Fo: a4Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FpE a5Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FqP   a6Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Fr[   2Ϛst{ulEva7Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Fsf  a8Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Ftq Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Fontu toc 1toc 1v` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#2ywxy=z[toc 2toc 2w` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toc 3toc 3x` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#toc 4toc 4y` hp x (# !(#  !(# ` hp x (#toc 5toc 5z` hp x (#h!(# h!(# ` hp x (#2{{|vɥ}?~]toc 6toc 6{` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 7toc 7| toc 8toc 8}` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 9toc 9~` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#2}ˬvindex 1index 1` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#index 2index 2` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toatoa` hp x (#!(# !(# ` hp x (#captioncaption 2ylZJ_Equation Caption_Equation Caption ӢCy.X80,X\  P6G;PD7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPE2a=5,&a\  P6G;&PF@|ND,5|\  P6G;PGANE,mR PE37PH7nC:,|Xn4  pG;XW!@(#,h@\  P6G;hP\5hC:,.`Xh*f9 xr G;XX \$X >(#,.h>*f9 xr G;hX%6jC:,EDXj9 xOG;X"H5!,Х,5\  P6G;,P\#{,W80,.W*f9 xr G;X2e=5,e&e4  pG;&2\= Cy.X80,X\  P6G;PD7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XP E2a=5,&a\  P6G;&PF@|ND,5|\  P6G;PGANE,mR PE37PH7nC:,|Xn4  pG;XIW!@(#,h@\  P6G;hPJH5!,i,5\  P6G;,P\K{,W80,.0W*f9 xr G;X\5hC:,.2Xh*f9 xr G;XX X-#&a\  P6G;&P#  #|\  P6G;5P## PE37mRP##Xj\  P6G;9XP##Xn4  pG;|X#x` `  hh@hpp  DA 961560 1!%WDRAFT9/3/96 R M9Before the T[ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION g Washington, D.C. 20554  X-#Xj\  P6G;9XP#  X_-In the Matter of  hh@h)  XH- x ` `  hh@h)  X1-SPRINT CORPORATION` Xhh@h) (#  X -x` `  hh@hh)ppFile No. ISP96003(#  X -Petition for Declaratory Rulinghh@h)  0 0(#  X -Concerning Section 310(b)(4) and (d)@h)  X -of the Communications Act of 1934,@h)  X -as amended` `  hh@h)  Xy- DECLARATORY RULING AND ORDER  XK-x` ` Adopted: September 17, 1996hppReleased: September  1!%W 18 1!%W , 1996  X4-  X-By the Chief, International Bureau:  X-, Introduction ă  X- x1.` ` On March 5, 1996, Sprint Corporation (Sprint) filed a petition for declaratory ruling seeking approval for an increase in the foreign ownership of Sprint's capital stock from 28 to 35 percent. Specifically, Sprint seeks a ruling that such an increase of foreign ownership is consistent with the public interest under Section 310(b)(4) of the  Xe-Communications Act (the Act).e yO-ԍXx47 U.S.C. 310(b)(4), (d) (1994)#X\  P6G;P#.(#Ƅ We grant Sprint's petition. As the Commission indicated when it approved up to 28 percent foreign ownership in Sprint in December 1995, additional foreign equity contributions will enhance Sprint's ability to expand and improve its network  X -services and products to the benefit of U.S. consumers. X {O)!-ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#Sprint Declaratory Ruling and Order#X\  P6G;P#, 11 FCC Rcd 1850 (1996) (Sprint Declaratory Ruling). (#  X-- Background ă  X - x2.` ` Sprint is a publiclytraded U.S. corporation that owns or controls subsidiaries that hold domestic common carrier microwave licenses, international facility authorizations, cable landing licenses, and other Commission licenses and authorizations. Sprint conducts its businesses through subsidiaries. Sprint's long distance subsidiary is the third largest U.S. carrier of long distance services, providing voice, data and video services over a nationwide digital, fiber optic network. Sprint provides a broad spectrum of domestic and international"Q%0*0*0*E$"  X-voice and data services.Ki {Oy-ԍXxId. at 1851.(#K  X- x3.` ` Last year in the Sprint Declaratory Ruling, the Commission granted Sprint's request for a declaratory ruling that 10 percent equity investments each by France Telecom (FT) and Deutsche Telekom (DT) (20 percent total) in Sprint would not result in a transfer of control of Sprint to FT and DT. The Commission also granted, subject to strict conditions, Sprint's request for rulings that the proposed alien ownership in Sprint of up to 28 percent was consistent with Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, and that the proposed transaction was otherwise consistent with the public interest.  X -x4.` ` In reaching these conclusions, the Commission found that France and Germany did not offer effective competitive opportunities to U.S. carriers, as mandated by the  X -Commission's rules under Sections 214 and 310(b)(4),. Zi {O-ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#See Market Entry and Regulation of Foreignaffiliated Entities, Report and Order#X\  P6G;P#, 11 FCC Rcd 3873  {O-(1995) (Foreign Carrier Entry Order).(#. because FT and DT were monopoly providers of basic international telecommunications facilities in their respective countries. The Commission concluded, however, that two other important public interest factors weighed in favor of granting approval: (1) the current and planned liberalization of the French and German telecommunications markets; and (2) the competitive benefits for U.S. telecommunications markets of the FT and DT investment in Sprint.  XM-x5.` ` The Commission's public interest finding, however, is subject to strict  X6-conditions to address: (1) the potential for FT and DT to use their current #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#de jure# Xj\  P6G;9XP# and #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#de  X!-facto# Xj\  P6G;9XP# monopoly market power to engage in anticompetitive conduct affecting the U.S. international services market; and (2) the possibility that the committed telecommunications  X-liberalization in France and Germany may not occur on the anticipated schedule.\ i yO\-ԍXxThe following five conditions apply: (1) Sprint is regulated as a dominant carrier on the France and Germany routes; (2) Sprint is not allowed to operate newly acquired circuits on the U.S.France and U.S.Germany routes until alternative infrastructure to provide alreadyliberalized services and basic switched voice resale competition is available in France and Germany; (3) Sprint is prohibited from accepting special concessions from any foreign carrier and must file certain periodic reports; (4) Sprint must obtain a written commitment from FT to lower the accounting rate between the United States and France to the same range as the U.S.U.K. and U.S.Germany; and (5) Sprint must file a report with this Commission no later than March 31, 1998 detailing how France and Germany have implemented effective competitive opportunities and whether the anticipated liberalization has occurred. If it has not, the Commission indicated it would take further action, including designating for hearing the issue of whether the public interest continues to be served by Sprint's holding of Section 214 facilities  {O#-authorizations on the U.S.France and U.S.Germany routes. #W*f9 xr G;0X#See Sprint Declaratory Ruling#X\  P6G;P# at 185051. (# \  X- x6.` ` The Commission also concluded that the French and German investment in"p0*((S" Sprint did not result in a transfer of control of Sprint to FT or DT under Section 310(d) of the Act. It found that FT's and DT's consent rights regarding matters such as issuance of new equity, the sale of assets, certain business combinations, and entry into telecommunications and nontelecommunications businesses, as well as certain voting rights, did not rise to the level of a transfer of control. The Commission further noted that FT and  X-DT expressed intent not to control Sprint and no evidence was presented to the contrary.Ci {O-ԍXxId. (#C  X_- Sprint's Petition ă  X1- x7.` ` In its petition, Sprint asserts that the increase in its foreign ownership from 28 percent to 35 percent will result from passive, widely dispersed investors whose individual equity positions will not exceed one percent of Sprint's capital stock. Sprint argues these investors will have neither the interest nor the ability to control Sprint. Sprint also emphasizes that FT's and DT's ownership interests in Sprint are not expected to increase, and  X -Sprint will continue to be bound by the terms of the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP#. It also asserts that Sprint's Board of Directors and management will continue to be comprised predominantly of U.S. citizens. Sprint states that, because these factors have remained unchanged since the  X{-#Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP#, no finding regarding transfer of control is necessary. Sprint also states that, given these factors, an increase of foreign ownership in Sprint up 35 percent is consistent with the Commission precedent. It cites in particular the Bureau's decision last year that granted MCI's request to increase its foreign ownership from 28 percent to 35  X!-percent.!Zi {O,-ԍXxSee MCI Communications Corporation, 10 FCC Rcd 8697 (1995) (MCI Declaratory Ruling (35  {O-Percent)).(#ƺ Sprint asserts that all of the findings and conclusions made by the Bureau in the  X -#Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#MCI Declaratory Ruling (35 Percent)# Xj\  P6G;9XP# are relevant in this case and mandate grant of its  X-petition.Vi yO\-ԍXxSprint petition at 34.(#V  X-3 Comments ă  X- x8.` ` Sprint's petition was placed on public notice, and Vebacom GmhH (Vebacom)  X-was the only party to file comments.q Fi yOy!-ԍXxPublic Notice, Report No. I8157 (rel. Mar. 15, 1996). (#q Although Vebacom does not object to the proposed increase in the level of foreign ownership of Sprint, it argues that the reporting requirements  XT-imposed on Sprint in the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP# are insufficient. It asks the Commission to require more detailed reports on the progress of liberalization in the German and French telecommunications markets. Vebacom asserts that, absent more detailed reporting requirements, there is no way for the Commission to ensure that the proposed level of increased foreign investment in Sprint actually will benefit U.S. consumers and the U.S." 0*((Z" economy. In addition, Vebacom contends that Sprint has failed to provide absolute assurance that FT's and DT's investment will not increase. Finally, Vebacom disagrees with Sprint that the Bureau's decision to allow MCI to achieve up to 35 percent foreign ownership is similar to this case. Vebacom states that Sprint's case raises more concerns than in the case of MCI because of Sprint's alliance with FT and DT, both monopoly carriers in their home markets.  X-Vebacom seeks assurances that unaffiliated U.S. carriers will not be permanently  Xv-disadvantaged by Sprint's affiliation with DT and FT.L vi yO-ԍxVebacom comments at 1, 35.L  XH-x9.` ` In response, Sprint opposes Vebacom's request for additional reporting requirements. Sprint states that since ownership by FT and DT will not increase above the 10 percent ownership levels currently authorized by Commission, further reporting requirements  X -#Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX## Xj\  P6G;9XP#(beyond those imposed in the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP#) on Sprint's U.S.France and U.S.Germany routes are unwarranted. Sprint argues that Vebacom's request is simply a duplication of an earlier request it made in response to the Sprint Declaratory Ruling. Sprint emphasizes that an additional seven percentage points above the current level of 28 percent is needed to accommodate daily fluctuations in the level of foreign ownership of Sprint's  X-publicly traded capital stock.N Xi yO-ԍXxSprint petition at 2.(#N  Xd- ,0 Discussion  XM-  X6- x10.` ` Foreign ownership greater than 25 percent in Sprint, the parent corporation of Title III common carrier radio licensees, triggers the applicability of Section 310(b)(4) of the Act. Under Section 310(b)(4), "[n]o . . . common carrier . . . license shall be . . . held by . . . any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any corporation of which more than onefourth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens . . . if the Commission finds  X-that the public interest will be served by the . . . revocation of such license."S i yO\-ԍXx47 U.S.C.  310(b)(4). (#S As stated above, the Commission has the discretion under Section 310(b)(4) to disallow foreign ownership along a vertical ownership chain that exceeds the 25 percent benchmark.  Xg- x11.` ` We conclude that permitting Sprint to increase its foreign ownership by seven percent from 28 to 35 percent is not inconsistent with the public interest under Section 310(b)(4). The increased foreign ownership will come from passive investors, who will each  X"-own less than one percent of Sprint's capital stocks.N "xi yOK$-ԍXxSprint petition at 4.(#N These passive investors are widely dispersed and will have neither the interest nor the ability to control Sprint. As Sprint affirmed in its reply, FT's and DT's ownership in Sprint will not change as a result of the proposed increase in Sprint's foreign ownership. Allowing an additional seven percent" 0*((;" foreign ownership in Sprint under these circumstances is consistent with prior Commission  X-and Bureau actions, including the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#MCI Declaratory Ruling (35 Percent)# Xj\  P6G;9XP#.^i {Ob-ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#See, e.g., GRC Cablevision, Inc.#X\  P6G;P#, 47 F.C.C.2d 467, 30 R.R.2d 827 (1974); Teleport Transmission  {O,-Holdings, 8 FCC Rcd 3063 (Com. Car. Bur. 1993); IDB Communications Group, Inc., 6 FCC Rcd 4652  {O-(Com. Car. Bur. 1991); MCI Declaratory Ruling (35 Percent), 10 FCC Rcd at 8701.(# Because of the dispersed nature of this additional foreign ownership, we do not apply an effective competitive opportunities analysis in our public interest determination under Section 310(b)(4)  X-to the seven percent foreign ownership at issue in this petition.i {OE -ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#See Foreign Carrier Entry Order#X\  P6G;P# at 387983.(#Ʋ We also conclude that, given that no foreign carrier will own more than one percent of the increased foreign ownership in Sprint, there is no basis to apply our effective competitive opportunities analysis  Xa-under Section 214.ai {O -ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#See id#X\  P6G;P#. at 3881.(#Ɨ  X3-x12.` ` We agree with Sprint that increased, widely dispersed foreign ownership in  X -Sprint will serve the public interest by benefiting U.S. consumers and the U.S. economy." i {O-ԍXx#W*f9 xr G;0X#See#X\  P6G;P# Sprint petition at 4.(#Ơ As Sprint notes, the Commission has previously found that such foreign investment provides capital that can fuel investment in stateoftheart infrastructure that leads to economic growth and job formation in the U.S. economy and facilitates competition among U.S. carriers both at  X -home and abroad. i {O-ԍXxId. at 4; see also #W*f9 xr G;0X#MCI Declaratory Ruling (35 Percent)#X\  P6G;P# at 8698.(# Thus, we conclude that these additional foreign equity contributions are not inconsistent with the public interest under Section 310(b)(4). We note, however, that Sprint continues to be bound by the conditions and requirements imposed by the Commission  X{-in the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint # Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP#, which requires prior Commission approval of any increase  Xf-in Sprint's voting or ownership interests.#Xj\  P6G;9XP#f6 i {OM-ԍXxSee #W*f9 xr G;0X#Sprint Declaratory Ruling#X\  P6G;P# at 187274.(#ƶ  X8-x13. ` ` We also agree with Sprint that we need not address whether the proposed increase in foreign ownership in Sprint will result in a transfer of control. As we noted above, the increased foreign ownership will come from passive investors, no single new foreign investor will own more than one percent of Sprint's stock, and these investors will not acquire a right to determine Sprint policy or to dominate Sprint management. Moreover, Sprint's Board of Directors and its manner of conducting business, factors considered  X-previously in the #Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#Sprint Declaratory Ruling# Xj\  P6G;9XP#, will remain unchanged. As a result, we need not consider again, in this proceeding, whether the proposed increased foreign ownership will  X-result in a transfer of control.  Xk- x  XT- x14.` ` Finally, we decline to impose further reporting requirements on Sprint, as urged"T 0*(("  X-by Vebacom. In the Sprint Declaratory Ruling, the Commission imposed strict conditions and safeguards designed to protect against anticompetitive behavior and other potential anticompetitive effects from the investment by FT and DT in Sprint. These safeguards include reporting requirements to monitor the progress of telecommunications liberalization in France and Germany. Given that FT's and DT's ownership interests in Sprint will not  X-increase beyond the 20 percent considered by the Commission in the Sprint Declaratory  Xz-Ruling, we do not believe it is necessary or appropriate to impose additional reporting requirements in this proceeding. We will, however, require Sprint to notify the Commission if a foreign investor acquires more than a one percent equity interest in Sprint.  X7- x  X -0 Conclusion ă  X - x15.` ` We conclude that the public interest will be served by granting this declaratory ruling. Based on Sprint's representations that the increased foreign investment will be passive and no foreign investor (other than FT and DT) will own more than one percent, we find that the proposed increase in foreign ownership of Sprint from 28 percent to 35 percent is not inconsistent with the public interest under Section 310(b)(4) of the Act. Given that the ownership interest of Sprint's foreign carrier affiliates, FT and DT, will not increase, we decline to impose any additional reporting requirements upon Sprint.  X:- Ordering Clauses ă  X -x16.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's request for a declaratory ruling IS GRANTED. The level of 35 percent foreign ownership in Sprint, as described in the petition, is not inconsistent with the public interest Section 310(b)(4) of the Act.  X-x17.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint shall continue to conduct periodic surveys of its public shareholders to ensure compliance with the 35 percent maximum level of foreign ownership in Sprint found to be not inconsistent with the public interest pursuant to Section 310(b)(4) of the Act.  X=-x18.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint shall notify the Commission if the ownership interest of any foreign investor exceeds one percent. "0*(("  X-x19.` ` This order is effective upon adoption. Petitions for reconsideration under  X-Section 1.106 may be filed within 30 days of the date of the public notice of this order. (#Xh*f9 xr G; 2XX#See# Xj\  P6G;9XP# Section 1.4(b)(2)). x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhDonald H. Gips  X -x` `  hhBureau Chiefhpp    X -x` `  hhInternational Bureaupp