PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 1919 M St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 96-2067 December 10 , 1996 MEMORANDUM OPINION ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONCLUDES THAT COMMISSION'S RECENTLY ADOPTED WIRELESS ENHANCED 911 RULES ARE CONSISTENT WITH WIRETAP ACT CC Docket No. 94-102 The Commission has received a Department of Justice Memorandum Opinion finding that the wireless enhanced 911 (E911) rules recently adopted by the Commission in CC Docket No. 94-102 do not require persons subject to those rules to engage in any practices that might result in a viola- tion of the Wiretap Act or other applicable provisions of law. In a Report and Order adopted June 12, 1996, the Commission prescribed rules requiring certain wireless carriers to provide the location information of a 911 caller to State or local officials operat ing the appropriate Public Safety Answering Point. The location information requirement estab lished by the Commission takes effect five years after the effective date of the rules, which was October 1, 1996. The Commission indicated in the E911 Order that it had requested an opinion from the Department of Justice regarding whether the provision of location information would be a violation of the Wiretap Act. In a Memorandum Opinion issued on September 10, 1996, the Department of Justice concludes that the requirements of the Commission's rules relating to wireless E911 features and functions do not violate either the Wiretap Act, the Electronic Communications Act, or the Fourth Amend- ment to the United States Constitution. With respect to the interpretation of Section 1002(a) of the Wiretap Act, the Department of Justice concludes that the statutory provision, by its terms, does not prohibit a wireless carrier's transmission to local public safety organizations of information regard ing the physical location of a wireless 911 caller. The Department of Justice also concludes that Section 2703 of the Electronic Communications Act applies to a carrier's transmission of location information, but the caller, by dialing 911, has im pliedly consented to such disclosure, thus permitting the Federal Government to require the carrier to disclose such information without a warrant or Court Order. Finally, the Department of Justice concludes that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the required transmission of location information because of the caller's implied consent to the disclosure and because a caller who dials 911 has neither an actual nor a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to his or her where- abouts at the time of the call. The full text of the Department of Justice Memorandum Opinion has been included in CC Docket No. 94-102 and is available for review during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 239, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037 (202)857-3800. - FCC -