WPC 2BJ Z CourierCourierArialArial Boldx6X@`7X@HP LaserJet 4_230_1HPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\_)^@26F #|x  ЊSi PostScriptlpt2)HPLAIIPO.WRSx  @,D,D2I@*CourierArial2eKHXKF Courier New (TT)AvantGardeAvantGarde (Bold)Courier New (Bold) (TT)HelveticaArial (Bold) (TT)"i~'^99Ipp.DDNt9D99pppppppppp99tttp̅}9ep}}999\p.ppepp9pp..e.ppppDe9peeeeE5EtD9sZDDD9DDDDDDpD|9pppppȰepppp99999999pppppppppepp|pepppppeese|pppppppspsp9.D|DD9|Xssep.p:pDpDp.pxppppȼDDDeees}L}9}Zpppppps}e}e}eppDpe}Dp|8dp,(,WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNHxxHlpD|pppppLJpDHpD,,DDpDDxppzHxxHsdd,DdD"dxdldtxxdyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy7;>oo'JJUy7C7Woooooooooo77yyyvska-av]wycUzw`FyFydK?z()e(z/`C8,R(hX`2p NQXTCourier New (TT)B1WP}WP{.PF1AGE = PostScrip"5@^8B_oo0BBNu8B88ooooooooooBBuuuzÐz8ozzzB8BuoBozozoBzz88o8zzzzNoBzooodN8Nu8BB!BBPRBnzoooooȲooooo88888888zzzzzzzzzoozzzozzooooooooozzzzzzPzBzBB8zooz8zRzzzȽNRooNF8ooBzoooooJIoBoB88ddoBBoo8dBBtBnnnnuny2Psu7coonCzshcnonwyXzXshn|y8B_oo0BBNu8B88ooooooooooBBuuuzÐz8ozzzB8BuoBozozoBzz88o8zzzzNoBzooodN8Nu8odooBȆBȖ88ddFoBoB8Boooo8oBJouBnPnBBBso8BBIozȐ8888uzooooooooooo8888zzzzzzznzzzzzoz2 R-#XX2PkQDXP# a{T   a{T  T  PH-x` `  hh@hpp DA 95345 h PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED ON GLCC'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION   `GRANTING AMERITECH'S AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE VIDEO DIALTONE SERVICE  WPC NOS. 6926, 6927, 6928, 6929, 6930 x` ` hh@hppReleased: February 24, 1995 a{T    BxOn February 3, 1995 Great Lakes Cable Coalition (GLCC) petitioned the  xCommission for reconsideration of the Commission's Order and Authorization granting  xAmeritech authority to provide video dialtone service in multiple locations in its telephone  R-service area. (See Order and Authorization, FCC 94340, released January 4, 1995).   x GLCC requests that the Commission rescind its order and authorization until  xAmeritech's local exchange monopoly is opened to competition. In the alternative, GLCC  xyargues that the Commission should amend its decision to clarify certain sections of the  xorder. In particular, GLCC argues that the Commission should include in its ordering  xclause a requirement that Ameritech provide a minimum of 390 channels of capacity.  xjGLCC also argues that the Commission should clarify that Ameritech is prohibited from  x=undertaking any channel sharing scheme under its authorization. GLCC further argues  xthat the ordering clauses in Ameritech's authorization should expressly prohibit  xAmeritech from providing programming over its system, either directly or through an  xaffiliate. Finally, GLCC argues that the Commission should clarify its position on the  xrelevance of comparisons with traditional cable data as support for the reasonableness of Ameritech's economic justification analyses.  R -  R!-  ]xOppositions to this Petition must be filed by March 6, 1995, and Replies to an  R"- xOpposition must be filed by March 15, 1995. Interested parties should file an original  xand four copies with the Secretary, FCC, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.  xA copy should also be sent to Peggy Reitzel, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, Room 544,  x1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., to the Commission's contractor for public  xservice records duplication, ITS, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C.">&0*((`'"  x20037, and to the FCC Public Reference Room, 6th Floor, 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. xCopies of the Petition can be obtained from ITS at (202)8573800. The Petition  xalso is available for review and photocopying at the FCC Public Reference Room from 8:3012:30 and 1:303:00, Monday through Thursday.   xWe will treat this proceeding as nonrestricted for purposes of the Commission's  R- xex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. 1.12001.1216. For further information  xzcontact Peggy Reitzel, Policy and Program Planning Division of the Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 4181579. x` ` hh@Federal Communications Commission