WPC+ 2B3T Z3|^)Times New Roman (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)Times New Roman (TT)iptHPLA5LPC.WRSx  @,,%EX@HP LaserJet 5L (PCL)5iptHPLA5LPC.WRSX\  P6G;,,%EPX01Í Í#C\  P6Q/P##XP\  P6QVXP#2F (F@nR@Courier New (TT)Times New Roman (TT)"5@^*7DSS77S^*7*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx7Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf7.7NS7JSJSJ7SS..S.SSSS7A.SSxSSJP!PZ*7777CE7SSxJxJxJxJxJooJfJfJfJfJ7.7.7.7.xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxJxSxSxSxSxS]SxSxJxJoJoJoJfJfJfJxSxSxxSxSxSxSCS7S777SAxSf.fExSxSxSxo7oE]A]AN:*LS7JSSSSS.4}}S2S}277JJS77SS7J72t7[[[[^ee*C`^.wRSSn[Cfx`xWlRx[][ceIfIs`Wx[rriwge*7DSS77S^*7*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx7Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf7.7NS7JSJSJ7SS..S.SSSS7A.SSxSSJP!PZ7SJSS7]777JJ:S7A7xx*7SSSS!S7.S^7SC[227`L*724S}}}Jxxxxxxoffff7777xxxxxxx^xxxxxx]SJJJJJJoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSSSTimes New Roman (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)Times New Roman (Italic) (TT)<p?^N;Xk^\  P6QPzq?cN;Xc4  pQ<7PC2XVXP\  P6QXP"5@^;N_uuµ*NNu;N;AuuuuuuuuuuAAgשN[ЩܩNANnuNgugugNuuAAuAuuuuN[Auuuugp/p~;NN'NN]`NuugggggМgggggNANANANAuuuuuuuuuuguuuuuuugggggggguuuuuu]uNuNNNu[uA`uuuЩN`[[NR;juNguuuuu@HuFuFNNgguNNuuNgNFtN捍:]@suuCzsffz;N_uuµ*NNu;N;AuuuuuuuuuuAAgשN[ЩܩNANnuNgugugNuuAAuAuuuuN[Auuuugp/p~NuguuNNеNNggRuN[N;Nuuuu/uN@uNu]FFNj;NFHugМNNNNugggggggggggAAAAuuuuuuuuuuuuuu2bx  Z @"3|P a<  @-  -@=Њ#]\  P6QkP#uuu驩ggggg[A[A[A[Auuuuuuuuuuuuugggggguuuu][[N[uA`u驩gg[[NR;~uNuuuuuuFMuFuFNNuuuNNuuNuNFtN捍:]@suuCzsffz;NuuANNu;N;AuuuuuuuuuuNNu٩[uܩ驩NANuNuggNuANA‚ug[Nuuug\4\yNuuuuNN鵵NNuuRuN[N;Nuuuu4uNFuNu]FFN~;NFMuu驜[[[[uuuuuugggggAAAAuuuuuuuuHP LaserJet 5L (PCL)5iptHPLA5LPC.WRSX\  P6G;,,%UP"5@^;NuuANNu;N;AuuuuuuuuuuNNu٩[uܩ驩NANuNuggNuANA‚ug[Nuuug\4\y;NN'NN]`Nuuuuuu驩ggggg[A[A[A[Auuuuuuuuuuuuugggggguuuu][[N[uA`u驩gg[[NR;~uNuuuuuuFMuFuFNNuuuNNuuNuNFtN捍:]@suuCzsffz;NuuANNu;N;AuuuuuuuuuuNNu٩[uܩ驩NANuNuggNuANA‚ug[Nuuug\4\yNuuuuNN鵵NNuuRuN[N;Nuuuu4uNFuNu]FFN~;NFMuu驜[[[[uuuuuugggggAAAAuuuuuuuu2@R&@"5@^2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`l2CC!CCPRCddYYYYYYzYzYzYzYC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddoddYYYYYzYzYzYddddddPdCdCCCdNdz8zRdddCRoNoNNF2[dCYddddd7>d<d<CCYYdCCddCYCdYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddndddddddTimes New Roman (TT)Times New Roman (Bold) (TT)Times New Roman (Italic) (TT) a<  @-  -@=Њ#]\  P6QkP#"5@^2Coddȧ8CCdr2C28ddddddddddCCrrrdzNdzoȐC8CtdCdoYoYCdo8Co8odooYNCodddYO,Oh2CC!CCPRCdodddddȐYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddoddddzodddYYYYYYddddooPoNoNCNodo8RoodȐYYoNoNNF2ldCddddddd<d<CCoodCCddCoCddzzzzzzzzzzCCCCozdddddddYYYYY8888dddddddndddddYda8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . 2"k k=!!vM"a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` 2%"# 2$ $a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersC @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# 2( % l& +''a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers h` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# 2+()*%+a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p a1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2.+,3--a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   20.S/}/V0a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . a1Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%F$ a2Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%F/ 2311A22a3Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%F: a4Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FE a5Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%FP   a6Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%F[   2~63 4!Y5"5a7Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%Ff  a8Paragraph+%X,1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)%8=(%  H*%F q a1IndentedLeft-indented text!6n ? I.Xa2IndentedLeft-indented text"?C ? A.` ` 2h9#6$P7%7&8a3IndentedLeft-indented text#HP ? ` ` 1. a4IndentedLeft-indented text$Qp- ? ` `  a.` 'a5IndentedLeft-indented text%[ܽ ? ` `  '(1) hh-a6IndentedLeft-indented text&dK ? ` `  'hh-(a)42<'9(^:)s+;*|;a7IndentedLeft-indented text'l݇ ? ` `  'hh-4i)h:a8IndentedLeft-indented text(u-b ? ` `  'hh-4:a)ppAa1InterrogatoresStarts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent)UZZI.footnote tex *$ d\  PC 2qA+L<,<-z=.O"?Default Para`6LM%0=(%:*%8ÿ,_:NE+1'#A\  PP##Xx6X@X@#Footnote Ref`6LFM%*=(%_:h :*%8ÿ,_:NE,**#A\  PP##Xx6X@X@#Page Number`6LbM%*=(%_:h :*%8ÿ,_:NE-'#A\  PP#,JR Z bj ##Xx6X@X@#Header2L1, _3, wO_:%1%c%1L _:%1 LL1.!(##Xx6X@ X@# R Z bj ##Xx6X@ X@#28G/uA0OD1egF2lFenter 2L1ÿ,tT_3, wO_:% 1%c%1L tT_:%1tTLL1/   d 4 <DL!T$#Xx6X@vX@#   4 <DL!(##Xx6X@wX@# Footer:L8c%_:iBLHÿ,|F L _: 0 !(##Xx6X@X@# R Z bj ##Xx6X@X@#footnote referencefootnote reference1 Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font2 2J3jG4hG5eH6Ifootnote textfootnote text3;#C\  P6QP#RTJHt @6y2 inch margins )?,=(o,*o,ÿHt .E4 ` ` 2Col-Exchang@6y2Col Settings for the Exchange and L&I Newsletter.E52 ` `   dd #e P[CP#T$҇Exchange@6ySettings for the Exchange and L&I newsletter .E6M `  #e P[CP#2L7J8|iK9|K:laLWRÿHt @6yMargins for Washington Report*o,ÿHt .E7K ` @ h #&d H@X@#wfxRecipientwfxRecipient8  wfxFaxNumwfxFaxNum9  heading 1heading 1:2R;vL<@uM=@N>Oheading 2heading 2; toc 1toc 1<` hp x (#(#`toc 2toc 2=` hp x (#` (#`toc 3toc 3>` hp x (#@(#`@(#`` hp x (#2Z?ER@cTAVBXtoc 4toc 4?` hp x (#(#`(#`` hp x (#toc 5toc 5@` hp x (#(#`(#`` hp x (#toc 6toc 6A` hp x (#(#`(#`` hp x (#toc 7toc 7B` hp x (#` (#`` (#`` hp x (#2`CZD ]E+_F_toc 8toc 8C` hp x (#( (#`( (#`` hp x (#toc 9toc 9D` hp x (# (#` (#`` hp x (#Word222NullWord222NullE11#x6X@CX@##x6X@CX@#NormalNormalF11#\  PCP##x6X@CX@#2=cG`H[aIaJobwfxTime0 `67MwfxTime o:%*=(%~0 :*%8ÿ,`0NEG  wfxCompany`67MwfxCompany:%*=(%~0 :*%8ÿ,`0NEH  wfxSubject`67MwfxSubject:%*=(%~0 :*%8ÿ,`0NEI annotation r`67Mannotation reference~0 :*%8ÿ,`0NEJ;;#6\  PQP##XP\  PQXP#2fKocLGdMdNoeannotation t`67Mannotation text=(%~0:*%8ÿ,`0NEKE;#C\  PQP##XP\  PQXP#heading 3`67Pheading 3o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEL#heading 4`67Pheading 4o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEM#heading 5`67Pheading 5o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEN#  2hO5fPfQ]gRgheading 6 `67Pheading 6o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEO#  heading 7 `67Pheading 7o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEP# heading 8 `67Pheading 8o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEQ#heading 9 `67Pheading 9o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NER#2jSvhT-iUiVAjBody Text`67PBody Texto:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NESBody Text In`67PBody Text Indent(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NETCentered0`67PCentered o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEU ClosingPhras`67PClosingPhrase*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEV!"2+oWjXkY!lZnHeaderNumber`67PHeaderNumbers*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEW.'( ( LetterClosin`67PLetterClosing*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEX)*macro 0`67Pmacro o:%*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEY+,` 4p x (##X\  PG;P##Xm2PG;XP#` hp x (#Normal Inden`67PNormal Indent*=(% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NEZ-.2r[J]o\|p]|#q^tqPleading Sig`67PPleading Signature% 0 :*%8ÿ, 0NE[/0h!(#header1header1\  header2header2]  BibliogrphyBibliography^:X (# 2y_Er`3Esaxtb|xTech InitInitialize Technical Style_. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 TechnicalDoc InitInitialize Document Style`z   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperaE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:>#o\  PCXP##]\  PCP#index 1Y`6]index 1 I*=( Y :* 8BYNEf` (#` hp x (#2g2}h2ijindex 2Y`6]index 2 I*=( Y :* 8BYNEg ` (#`` hp x (#toa heading`6]toa heading*=( Y :* 8BYNEh!"(#` hp x (#captionY`6]caption I*=( Y :* 8BYNEiE#;$#o\  P CXP##]\  P CP#_Equation Ca`6]_Equation Caption Y :* 8BYNEj;%;&#o\  P CXP##]\  PCP#2kg@O@@ϊ" 2=1!oSmall Circle1c?1=o>?1L=1k""5@^(1<a݅@  I.   X(# 2d)SubheadingSubheading0\ E A.  HIGHLIGHT 1Italics and Boldldedd+. DRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and Date 211$1U1LETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5 3'3'Standard'3'3StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 ;   LEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5f 3'3'Standard'A'AStandardZ K e6VE L"nu;   LETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11L 3'3'Standard3'3'StandardZ K e6VE L"nU9   LEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14 3'3'StandardA'A'StandardLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 119   2nWdj<TITLETitle of a DocumentK\ * ăBLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indentedN X HIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold LargeB*d. HIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscored V -q2E-<8iLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/marginsu H XX  3'3'LetterheadZ K e VE L"n3'2b8 [[INVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macroz 4p, $0$00INVOICE HEADRHeading Portion of Math Invoice+C`*   4X 99L$0 **(  ӧ XX SMALLSmall TypestyleFINEFine Typestyle2([[[JLARGELarge TypestyleEXTRA LARGEExtra Large TypestyleVERY LARGEVery Large TypestyleENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Header+w ,,EnvelopeZ K e VE L"n,,EnvelopeLarge, Italicized and Under;    ,, 88+  `   2XZR1dfStyle 14Swiss 8 Pt Without Margins$$D Co> PfQ  )a [ PfQO Style 12Dutch Italics 11.5$2lo |Style 3oDutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabs )a [ PfQO  ddn  # c0*b, oT9 !Style 4 PSwiss 8 Point with MarginsDq Co> PfQ  dddd  #  Style 1.5Dutch Roman 11.5 Font4h )a [ PfQO  dddn Style 2Dutch Italic 11.5$ )^ `> XifQ 2,E%Style 5Dutch Bold 18 Point$RH$L T~> pfQ_  )a [ PfQO Style 7Swiss 11.5$$V )ao> PfQ ]  )a [ PfQO Style 6Dutch Roman 14 Point$$N w [ PfQ   )a [ PfQO Style 10oInitial Codes for Advanced U )a [ PfQK  dddn  ##  [[ b, oT9 !b, oT9 !n )^ `> XifQ ` Advanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   f )^ `> XifQ Advanced Legal W2^ej Style 8PfInitial Codes for Beginninggi )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9  [ &e )^ `> XifQ ` Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   d )^ `> XifQ Beginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   jH )^ `> XifQ    Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988`6 >Page  j )^ `> XifQ    Page ` Copyright  Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988 Style 9Initial Codes for Intermediate )a [ PfQK  dddn  # X` hp x (#%'b, oT9 Њ [ e )^ `> XifQ ` Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide   3 )^ `> XifQ Intermediate Legal WordPerfect Learni2rlZtpara numnumbered indented paragraphs' Y- 1.(i) 1) 1.#Xw P7[hXP# 1. 1.Ҳendnote referenceendnote reference _Equation Caption_Equation Caption 1, 2, 3,?@65NumbersO@/"=(1*1÷$t ?.E1.25ddA, B,t ?@65Uppercase Letters1 ?*1÷$t ?.E .2G2*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "8ij@  3G3*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "Akl@` ` `  ` ` ` 4G4*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "Jmn` ` ` @  ` ` ` 2Qg5G5*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "Sop` ` `  @  6G6*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "\qr` ` `  @hhh hhh 7G7*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "est` ` `  hhh@ hhh 8G8*(KCHROED, AGOMEZ, BSCINTO 2pTt9G9*(K&7>Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7>NGI "wwx` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 10G0*(Q&7tDocument Style Gl0 "7t GI "GH` ` ` 11G1*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "4I$J     12G2*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "*KL    2u Bk13G3*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "'MN   14G4*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "&OP   15G5*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "&QR  . 16G6*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "&ST  . 2  ,  C 17G7*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "&UV  . 18G8*(Q&7tTechnical Document Style "7t GI "&WX  . 19G9*(Q&7tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7t GI "8YZ@  20G:*(Q&7tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7t GI "A[\@` ` `  ` ` ` 2  a 21G;*(Q&7tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7t G||LpD|pppdL8LtD8ttDDD8DDDDDDpD|8pppppȰppppp88888888|||||||||pp|||p||ppppptppppp|||||||88D|DD8|pttp|8|L|D|`|8|||||ȼLLLpppt|`|D|t|||||2E25G?*(Q&7tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7t GI "nef` ` `  hhh@  26G@*(Q&7tRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"7t GI "wgh` ` `  hhh@ppp ppp 27wSg K6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg EJmn` ` @  ` `  28wSg L6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg ESop` `  @  22$a29wSg M6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg E\qr` `  @hh# hhh 30wSg N6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Eest` `  hh#@( hh# 31wSg O6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Enuv` `  hh#(@- ( 32wSg P6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Ewwx` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2pd 33wSg R6w Document Style=(H8g Rܺ*HںwSg E{|` ` ` 34wSg S6w Technical Document Styleg Sܺ*HںwSg E4}$~     35wSg T6w Technical Document Styleg Tܺ*HںwSg E*2 {37wSg V6w Technical Document Styleg Vܺ*HںwSg E&   38wSg W6w Technical Document Styleg Wܺ*HںwSg E&  . 39wSg X6w Technical Document Styleg Xܺ*HںwSg E&  . 40wSg Y6w Technical Document Styleg Yܺ*HںwSg E&  . 2<S41wSg Z6w Technical Document Styleg Zܺ*HںwSg E&  . 42wSg [6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg E8@   43wSg \6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg EA@` `  ` ` ` 44wSg ]6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg EJ` ` @  ` `  2q'45wSg ^6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg ES` `  @  46wSg _6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg E\` `  @hh# hhh 47wSg `6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Ee` `  hh#@( hh# 48wSg a6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg En` `  hh#(@- ( 2" k!"49wSg b6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Ew` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 50wSg c6w Document Style=(H8g cܺ*HںwSg EF *  ׃  51wSg d6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg EJ` ` @  ` `  52wSg e6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg ES` `  @  2%"#c$+%53wSg f6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg E\` `  @hh# hhh 54wSg g6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Ee` `  hh#@( hh# 55wSg h6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg En` `  hh#(@- ( 56wSg i6w Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbersܺ*HںwSg Ew` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2(p.&&N''57wSg j6w Document Style=(H8g jܺ*HںwSg E` ` ` 58wSg k6w Technical Document Styleg kܺ*HںwSg E4$     59wSg l6w Technical Document Styleg lܺ*HںwSg E*  00 `?`??2*(E))O*61wSg n6w Technical Document Styleg nܺ*HںwSg E&   62wSg o6w Technical Document Styleg oܺ*HںwSg E&  . 63wSg p6w Technical Document Styleg pܺ*HںwSg E&  . 64wSg q6w Technical Document Styleg qܺ*HںwSg E&  . 2+ X-[ `<  #Xj\  P6G;VXP#FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION DA 982644  #Xj\  P6G;VXP##Xj\  P6G;VXP# =9#Xj\  P6G;VXP#*2 Before the V FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  X-Washington, D.C. 20554 ă In the Matters of R) R) Implementation of the Pay Telephone R)  X_-Reclassification and Compensation Provisions R)hCC Docket No. 96-128 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996R) R) Requests by SBC, Southern New EnglandR)  X -Telephone, and GTE to Extend Waiver R)hNSDL98147 of Coding Digit Requirement R) R) American Public Communications Council R)  X -Motion for Deferral of the Effective Date of R)hNSDL98148 the Payphone Order's Call Tracking R) Verification RequirementR)  X4-; ORDER  X-XxAdopted: December 29, 1998 @XhReleased: December 31, 1998 (#  X- Comments Due: January 29, 1999  X-Reply Comments Due: February 5, 1999 By the Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau:  Xe-J I. INTRODUCTION ă  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. i.(1)(a)(i) 1) a)     !x1. We have before us three petitions to extend previously authorized limited waivers of  xxthe Commission's requirements regarding the provision of payphonespecific coding digits, which  x.are intended to identify calls from payphones that are eligible for compensation for subscriber  x[800 and access code calls. The previous limited waivers relieved, under certain circumstances,  xthe obligation of certain local exchange carriers (LECs) to transmit Flexible Automatic Number  x\Identification (Flex ANI) coding digits to interexchange carriers (IXCs). These waivers also  x=relieved IXCs from the obligation to pay percall compensation to payphone service providers  x(PSPs) for calls from payphones where Flex ANI or other payphonespecific coding digits are  X#- xnot available. The waivers were originally ordered in the Commission's Payphone Orders to"#90*u'u'kkG""  X- x=expire on October 7, 1997, yOy-ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {OA-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 20541 (1996); Order  {O -on Reconsideration, 11 FCC Rcd at 21233 (1996) (together the "Payphone Orders"). The Payphone Orders  {O-were affirmed in part and vacated in part. See Illinois Public Telecomm. Ass'n v. FCC, 117 F.3d 555 (D.C. Cir.  {O-1997); see also Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {Oi-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 1778 (1997);  {O3-remanded, MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. FCC, No. 97-1675 (D.C. Cir. May 15, 1998).Č but have been extended three times and will expire on December 31,  X- x1998.& yO -ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {Ov -Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 16387  {O@ -(Com. Car. Bur. 1997); Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4998 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998);  {O -Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13FCCRcd11210 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998). The petitions before us were filed just three weeks before the current expiration date, by  x[Southwestern Bell Telephone, Pacific Bell, and Nevada Bell (collectively, SBC) (filed December  x9, 1998); by Southern New England Telephone (SNET) (filed December 9, 1998); and by GTE Service Corporation (GTE) (filed December 10, 1998).  Xv-  {x2. In this Order, we deny the petitions. This denial, however, is without prejudice to our  x<further consideration of the requested waivers following our examination of public comments and  x[additional information from the Petitioners. We also find that payphone compensation as paid  xbefore December 31, 1998, must continue without interruption until we take further action. In  xaddition, we seek comment on a related motion filed by the American Public Communications Council.  X -f II. BACKGROUND ă  X -  x3. In the Payphone Orders adopted in 1996, the Commission required LECs to provide  xpayphone-specific coding digits to PSPs and required PSPs to provide those digits from their  xpayphones to IXCs, by October 7, 1997. The Common Carrier Bureau, on its own motion, first  Xd- xextended the compliance date for these requirements to March 9, 1998.Zd  yO-ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {O-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 16387 (Com. Car. Bur. 1997). Subsequently, in  xLgranting requested waivers to extend the compliance to June 1998, the Bureau expressly noted  xthat providing payphone-specific coding digits (including Flex ANI) is a prerequisite to percall  X- xcompensation for toll free and access code payphone calls.Z$ yO"-ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {O#-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 4998 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998). During this second extension period,"F0*%%kk"  xjin April 1998, the Bureau granted a waiver that permitted IXCs to pay per-phone compensation  xto PSPs, rather than per-call compensation, for payphones from which payphone-specific coding  X- x[digits are not available.p\ yOK-ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {O-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 10893  {O-(Com. Car. Bur. 1998); clarified, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 7303 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998).p In its last limited waiver order, which extended the compliance date to  xzDecember 31, 1998, the Bureau emphasized that "[w]e do not anticipate granting any further  X-extensions of these waivers beyond the time limits set forth in this order."#Z yOA -ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {O -Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13FCCRcd.11210, para. 24 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998).#  Xv-  x4. In support of its current petition, SBC argues that two problems affect coding digits  xon a small percentage of payphone calls. The two problems described are: (1) the inability to  XH- xpass Flex ANI digits on 800type database service (e.g., 800, 888, 877) call routing to Plain Old  xTelephone Service phone numbers (800toPOTS); and (2) the inability to screen the IXCs'  xzcapabilities to receive Flex ANI digits from tandem switches on 800type database calls (800  x-tandem screening). SBC states that correcting the two problems is switchspecific. Accordingly,  xfor most of SBC's NORTEL switches, SBC requests an extension until the end of the second  xquarter of 1999. For most of SBC's Lucent switches, SBC requests an extension until the end  x=of the third quarter of 1999. For Ericsson switches, SBC requests an extension until the end of  xthe first quarter of 2000. Additionally, for Nevada Bell, SBC requests an extension for the  x!company's NORTEL DMS 10 switches until their planned replacement during 1999. For  xSouthwestern Bell and Pacific Bell, SBC also requests an extension for the companies' Lucent  x1AESS switches until their planned replacement during the 19992002 time period. Finally,  xagain for Southwestern Bell and Pacific Bell, SBC requests an indefinite extension for the  xcompanies' Lucent 4ESS switches for correcting only the 800toPOTS problem, because it states  xthat Lucent has not responded to SBC's requests for a date by which Lucent can provide the  xzneeded software feature for solving this problem for the 4ESS switches. SBC attaches to its  xipetition an Appendix describing the implementation process but does not include with its petition  xMverified statements or other evidence to support its requests. Although its petition did not  xinitially include a certificate of service on other parties, SBC did file a certificate of service on all parties on December 17, 1998.  X~-  "x5. In support of its petition, SNET argues that it needs an extension affecting only a  x<small percentage of payphones within its serving area because of problems with both 800 tandem  xscreening translation and 800toPOTS translation, and also to accommodate SNET's scheduled  xupgrade of its Stratford and Milford IAESS central offices to digital technology. SNET seeks  xan extension until May 31, 1999. It states that it is working with its switch vendors to resolve""0*%%kk\"  xthe problems associated with Flex ANI implementation. SNET does not include with its petition  xMverified statements or other evidence to support its requests. Although its petition did not  x=initially include a certificate of service on other parties, SNET did file a certificate of service on December 17, 1998.  X-  x6. In support of its petition, GTE argues that it needs an extension until June 30, 1999,  xbecause of two factors that it contends will delay its ability for full implementation: (1) certain  xGTE end offices at the tandem level are not yet Flex ANIcapable because they subtend non xaffiliated carriers' tandems that are not Flex ANIcapable; and (2) Lucent will not be able to  xprovide the required Flex ANI software upgrade packages for GTE Lucent tandems until March  x1999. GTE states that, based on the commitments received, it believes it can be 100% compliant  xzby June 30, 1999. GTE includes two exhibits with its petition consisting of a brief letter from  xzLucent stating, without explanation,"The current anticipated availability of these features is  xMarch, 1999," and a list of "GTE exchanges subtending RBOC/ILEC access tandems." GTE's petition includes a certificate of service upon all parties of record.  X- III. DISCUSSION ă  Xb-  Ox7. Any provision of the Commission's rules may be waived on our own motion or on  XK- xpetition if "good cause therefor is shown."DK yO-ԍx47 C.F.R.  1.3.D The record before us consists only of the three  xpetitions. The petitions include partial explanations for the waiver requests, but they leave a  xnumber of questions unanswered and in need of further explanation and supporting information.  xThe petitions do not suggest that circumstances have changed since the last time an extension  xwas granted, and they include no evidence, such as verified statements from vendors, to  xsubstantiate their arguments. Moreover, they were filed too late to develop an adequate record  xybefore the December 31, 1998 expiration of the previous waiver. On the basis of this record, we  xiare not persuaded that the Petitioners have presented good cause to justify yet another extension of the existing waivers.  Xe-  !x8. Since the extension that was granted in June 1998, the Petitioners have known of the  xDecember 31, 1998 deadline and of the admonition that the Bureau did not anticipate granting  xany further extensions. Nevertheless, the Petitioners have not attempted to justify or to submit  xjevidence that explains why they waited until the "eleventh hour," less than three weeks before  xthe year's end, to request a further extension. Without an explanation supported by such  xLevidence, we are not convinced, at this time, that the requested waivers would be in the public  x-interest. We therefore deny the requested waivers without prejudice to our further consideration  xof these requests following our examination of public comments and additional information from  xLthe Petitioners. In addition, we find that payphone compensation as paid before December 31, 1998, must continue without interruption until we take further action.""X0*%%kk!"Ԍ X-  ԙx9. Contemporaneously with this order, we are requiring the Petitioners, by letter, to  x[provide specific and necessary information regarding their waiver requests by January 8, 1999.  xThis information will be central to our further consideration of these waiver requests. For  x.example, we note that each Petitioner alleges that the performance of its vendors is beyond its  xcontrol. The petitions, however, do not indicate what performance commitments the Petitioners  xand their vendors agreed upon to meet each new extended compliance deadline, including the  xDecember 31, 1998 deadline, what contractual sanctions against their vendors were agreed upon  xfor nonperformance at each extended deadline, and why those agreements were not adequate to  x[meet the Petitioners' legal obligations. Except to a very limited extent, the petitions also do not  x-include statements from the vendors themselves, to substantiate or explain the failure to meet the  xDecember 31, 1998 deadline. At this point, vendor statements may prove important to clarify  xthe work plans that were implemented under each of the prior extensions, to explain why prior  xwork plans were not adequate to meet the deadlines, and to describe the work plans they are currently implementing.  X -  x 10. Because the Petitioners filed their relatively unsupported extension requests only  xshortly before the compliance deadline, they have made it impossible for us to seek public  xcomment on the requests and make an informed decision based on a complete record before that  xdeadline. We recognize that under these circumstances, which are largely of their own creation,  xthe Petitioners will not be in compliance with the requirement to provide Flex ANI payphone  xcoding digits after December 31, 1998. This unfortunate consequence does not constitute good  xcause to find that another extension would be in the public interest. Rather, it would be contrary  xto the public interest to postpone compliance for a fourth time without an informed assessment  x=of the facts underlying these extension requests, which may or may not show new or changed  xcircumstances since the last extension. In light of the Bureau's prior admonition that no further  xextensions of the waivers were anticipated, we are reluctant to grant further waivers without a  xfull record. Meanwhile, where payphonespecific coding digits are not yet available, IXCs must  X-continue to pay per-phone compensation rather than percall compensation.v\ yO -ԍ Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the  {O-Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 10893  {O-(Com. Car. Bur. 1998); clarified, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 7303 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998).v  Xe-  x 11. We emphasize that, in denying the petitions now, we do not prejudge whether the  x.Bureau will later grant additional waivers. To expedite the development of an adequate record  xon which to reach a reasoned decision, in separate letters we will direct the Petitioners to submit  xadditional information by January 8, 1999. We will also permit any persons wishing to comment  xon whether additional waivers are warranted to submit comments addressing the matters raised in the petitions by January 29, 1999; reply comments are due by February 5, 1999. "0*%%kk"Ԍ  x 12. Finally, on December 16, 1998, the American Public Communications Council  x=(APCC) filed a Motion for Deferral of the Effective Date of the Payphone Order's Call Tracking  xLVerification Requirement, contending that delays in implementing Flex ANI percall tracking as  xa result of past waivers make it premature to find that carriers have adequately verified their per X- xcall tracking capabilities.H X yO-ԍ Previously, on November 30, 1998, APCC had filed a letter requesting the Commission to issue a Public Notice of the waiver expiration and to clarify in that notice the obligations of LECs, PSPs, and IXCs regarding the transmission of coding digits and the tracking of dialaround calls.H APCC also alleges irregularities in carrier performance related to  xtracking and percall compensation. We will permit any persons wishing to comment on the  xAPCC motion to submit comments by January 29, 1999; reply comments are due by February 5, 1999.  X1- IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ă   x 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4,  x201-205, 218, 226, and 276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  151,  x154, 201-205, 218, 226, 276, the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the  xCommission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47  xC.F.R.  1.3, that the petitions for waiver filed by SBC, SNET, and GTE are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. x 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is effective upon release.   x15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that comments on the SBC, SNET, and GTE waiver  X- xpetitions and on the APCC motion for deferral must be submitted, separately, by January 29,  X-1999 ; reply comments thereon are due by February 5, 1999 . x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  x` `  hhAnna M. Gomez, Chief x` ` X XXhhNetwork Services Division(#h x` `  hhCommon Carrier Bureau