******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Lincoln County, Oregon and the ) Economic Development Alliance of ) Lincoln County, a non-profit corporation for ) Declaratory Ruling and Preemption Pursuant to ) CC Docket No. 97-241 Section 253 of the Communications Act of 1934 ) of Certain Provisions of the Oregon ) Telecommunications Utility Law ) ORDER Adopted: December 23, 1998 Released: December 23, 1998 By the Chief , Policy and Program Planning Division: 1. In this order, we dismiss as moot a petition for preemption filed by Lincoln County, Oregon (Lincoln County) and the Economic Development Alliance of Lincoln County (The Alliance) on December 4, 1997, pursuant to section 253 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Lincoln County and the Alliance sought preemption of Oregon Revised Statute  759.020(1) as interpreted and applied by the Oregon Public Utility Commission (Oregon PUC). That section prohibits the offering of telecommunications service on a "for hire" basis without a Certificate of Authority from the Oregon PUC. 2. In an Ex Parte letter filed on December 23, 1998, Lincoln County noted that, because "the operative facts have significantly changed since the filing of the original petition," the petition for preemption "is, in large part, now moot." Lincoln County indicates that the petition for preemption should be dismissed without prejudice. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, that the petition for preemption filed by Lincoln County and Economic development Alliance IS DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau