******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Teleport Communications - New York, ) ) Complainant, ) ) v. ) File No. E-95-4 ) NYNEX Telephone Companies, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Adopted: October 19, 1998; Released: October 19, 1998 By the Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On December 15, 1994, Teleport Communications - New York ("TCNY" or complainant), filed the above-captioned formal complaint against NYNEX Telephone Companies, now known as Bell Atlantic ("Bell Atlantic" or defendant). TCNY alleged, inter alia, that Bell Atlantic had violated Sections 201(b) and 202(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("the Act"), 47 U.S.C.  201(b), 202(a), and the Commission's rules, by refusing to allow interexchange carrier customers of TCNY to order, and to be billed for, cross-connections and special switched access services to TCNY's collocated facilities. On February 17, 1995, defendant filed its answer to the complaint, in which it denied the defendant's allegations and argued that its conduct did not violate the Act. 2. On October 15, 1998, counsel for TCNY filed a motion requesting dismissal of the complaint with prejudice. In support of its motion, TCNY states that all matters at issue in the Complaint have been settled. 3. We are satisfied that dismissal of the complaint will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91, 0.291, that Teleport Communications - New York's motion to dismiss this complaint with prejudice IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Alexander P. Starr Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau