******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of) ) Competitive Telecommunications Association,) Florida Competitive Carriers Association,) and Southeastern Competitive Carriers Association CC Docket No. 98-39 ) ) Petition on Defining Certain Incumbent LEC) Affiliates as Successors, Assigns, or Comparable) Carriers Under Section 251(h) of the ) Communications Act ) ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY COMMENTS Adopted: May 8, 1998 Released: May 8, 1998 Reply Comment Date: June 1, 1998 By the Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. On March 23, 1998, the Competitive Telecommunications Association, the Florida Competitive Carriers Association, and the Southeastern Competitive Carriers Association (collectively, the petitioners) filed a petition for declaratory ruling, or, in the alternative, a petition for rulemaking, regarding the regulatory status of certain incumbent local exchange carrier affiliates. On April 1, 1998, the Common Carrier Bureau issued a public notice seeking comments on the petition. The public notice set May 1, 1998, as the deadline for filing comments, and May 18, 1998, as the deadline for filing reply comments. 2. On May 6, 1998, the petitioners filed a motion for extension of time until June 8, 1998, for all parties to file reply comments. The petitioners assert that the additional three weeks will allow for a more fully developed record, given the number of parties filing comments and the pendency of due dates in several other proceedings. 3. Although the Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time, we agree with the petitioners that it is important that the record in this proceeding be as complete as possible. We find, therefore, that an extension of time for filing reply comments is warranted here. We decline, however, to extend the period for the entire three weeks requested by the petitioners. We believe that a two-week extension will provide the petitioners, as well as other interested parties, ample time to reply to the comments, which were filed on May 1, 1998. We, therefore, extend the deadline for filing reply comments until June 1, 1998. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.46, that the request of the Competitive Telecommunications Association, the Florida Competitive Carriers Association, and the Southeastern Competitive Carriers Association to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS GRANTED IN PART, and otherwise IS DENIED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is extended until June 1, 1998. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau