џWPCШŒ ћџ2m ZB’œ›.ЄЩHP LaserJet IIISiєXє\  PŽG;єPa190СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8С@Сии ƒС€АА СТТ a290СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersAССС@` ` Сии ƒС€СТ` ` ` Т a390СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersJССССС@И И Сии ƒС€` ` СТИ И И Т ћџ2‰­ŸЖLПШСa490СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersSССССССС@Сии ƒС€И И СТТ a590СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers\  ССССССССС@hh#Сии ƒС€СТhhhТ a690СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numberse  ССССССССССС@РР(Сии ƒС€hh#СТРРРТ a790СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersn ССССССССССССС@-Сии ƒС€РР(СТТ ћџ2$бЛ }Œ ˆ  “‘a890СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberswССССССССССССССС@pp2Сии ƒС€-СТpppТ a1ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a) $и€иТТ a2ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a) /ТТииТТ a3ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a) :ТТТТи‚иТТ ћџ2 žV ЉєД ПQ a4ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a) EТТТТТТиƒиТТ a5ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a) PТТТТТТТТи„иТТ a6ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)[ТТТТТТТТТТи…иТТ a7ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)fТТТТТТТТТТТТи†иТТ ћџ2› ЪB | …ˆ Ž a8ParagraphС1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)q ТТТТТТТТТТТТТТи‡иТТ a1IndentedLeft-indented text$!"и€иТТa2IndentedLeft-indented text-#$ССииТ` ` ` Тa3IndentedLeft-indented text6%&ССССи‚иТИ И И Тћџ2_—Э  dЉВ­a4IndentedLeft-indented text?'(ССССССиƒиТТa5IndentedLeft-indented textH)*ССССССССи„иТhhhТa6IndentedLeft-indented textQ+,ССССССССССи…иТРРРТa7IndentedLeft-indented textZ-.ССССССССССССи†иТТћџ2иЛ‘qLˆН“Ea8IndentedLeft-indented textc/0ССССССССССССССи‡иТpppТa189Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent12и€иa289Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent/34ТТииТТ a389Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent:56ТТТТи‚иТТ ћџ2Фž ЉЈДQПa489Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indentE78ТТТТТТиƒиТТ a589Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indentP9:ТТТТТТТТи„иТТ a689Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent[;<ТТТТТТТТТТи…иТТ a789Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indentf=>ТТТТТТТТТТТТи†иТТ ћџ2‘ Ъі!’Р"›R#Єэa889Starts with A. at margin, 1 at first indent q?@ТТТТТТТТТТТТТТи‡иТТ a188СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8ABС@Сии ƒС€АА СТТ a288СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers"ACDССС@` ` Сии ƒС€СТ` ` ` Т a388СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers#JEFССССС@И И Сии ƒС€` ` СТИ И И Т ћџ2­$­У%Жp&П&'Шхa488СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers$SGHССССССС@Сии ƒС€И И СТТ a588СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers%\IJССССССССС@hh#Сии ƒС€СТhhhТ a688СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers&eKLССССССССССС@РР(Сии ƒС€hh#СТРРРТ a788СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers'nMNССССССССССССС@-Сии ƒС€РР(СТТ ћџ2’(бп)КА*“j+•§a888СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers(wOPССССССССССССССС@pp2Сии ƒС€-СТpppТ a1DocumentDocument Style)FQRйй Срьь*СУУУ Уззи€и ййййззƒ ФФФ Фa2DocumentDocument Style**S T У Уии УУзззз Ф ФФФa3DocumentDocument Style+0U V ССУ Уи‚и зззз Ф Фћџ2n ,pФ-e4.e™/pўa4DocumentDocument Style,WXССУ УУУ.ФФ Ф Фa5DocumentСDocument Style- YZТТ a6DocumentСDocument Style. [\ТТ a7DocumentСDocument Style/]^ТТТ` ` ` Т ћџ2ё"0p  1А!2œР!3•\"a8DocumentСDocument Style0_`ТТТ` ` ` Т a1TechnicalTechnical Document Style14a!b УУУ Уззи€и ййййзз ФФССФ Фa2TechnicalTechnical Document Style2*cd У Уии УУззззФФ ССФ Фa3TechnicalTechnical Document Style3'ef У Уи‚и зззз ССФ Фћџ2C%4”##5„З#6„;$7„П$a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style4&ghУ Уиƒи зззз ССФ Фa5TechnicalTechnical Document Style5&ijССУ Уи„и . Ф Фa6TechnicalTechnical Document Style6&klССУ Уи…и . Ф Фa7TechnicalTechnical Document Style7&mnССУ Уи†и . Ф Фћџ29(8„u%>љ%9’7':pЩ'a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style8&opССУ Уи‡и . Ф ФаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œвв ШX0УУФФ УУФФШX0УУФФ УУФФ в87СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers98qrС@Сии ƒС€АА СТТ 86СDocument Style:stТТТ` ` ` Т ћџ29*;“k(<eў(=ec)>qШ)85Document Style;*uv У Уии УУзззз Ф ФФФ84СDocument Style< wxТТ 83СDocument Style= yzТТ 82Document Style>{ |ССУ УУУ.ФФ Ф Фћџ2c,?pk*@dл*AZ?+BЪ™+81СDocument Style?}~ТТТ` ` ` Т A, B,Uppercase Letters@ €.ТТ1, 2, 3,NumbersA‚1.80С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Bqƒ„ТТТТТТТТТТТТТТи‡иТТ ћџ2O/CП•,DДT-EЉ.FžБ.79С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)Cf…†ТТТТТТТТТТТТи†иТТ 78С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D[‡ˆТТТТТТТТТТи…иТТ 77С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)EP‰ŠТТТ` ` ` ТТИ И И ТТТи„иТhhhТ 76С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)FE‹ŒТТТ` ` ` ТТИ И И ТиƒиТТ ћџ2;2G}/HЪў/IПШ0JД‡175С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)G$Žи€иТТ 74С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)HqТТТТТТТТТТТТТТи‡иТТ 73С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)If‘’ТТТТТТТТТТТТи†иТТ 72С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)J[“”ТТТТТТТТТТи…иТТ ћџ2Я4KЉm2Lž3M“Д3NˆG471С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)KP•–ТТТ` ` ` ТТИ И И ТТТи„иТhhhТ 70С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)LE—˜ТТТ` ` ` ТТИ И И ТиƒиТТ 69С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)M:™šТТТ` ` ` Ти‚иТИ И И Т 68С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)N/›œТТииТ` ` ` Т ћџ2ё9O}5PИ~5Q67R<Е767С1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)O$žи€иТТ para numnumbered indented paragraphsPЈŸ' ‘вŒ 1.Œвййб#Xjє\  PŽG;XP#бвŒ 1.ŒвВhead1Q'ЁЂб#ј ф2pБC #бtoatoaRђЃшЄ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАмааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2O@Sд#:Tдї:UBЫ;VB >WP Heading 1WP Heading 1S>Ѕ>Іб#„Вў6X@ЩC„@#бггггУ УФ Фггггб#Xvў6X@ЩCX@#бWP Heading 2WP Heading 2T>Ї>Јб#еў6X@Щ Cе@#бггггУУФФггггб#Xvў6X@Щ CX@#бTechnical 8Technical 8UѕЉыЊ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггУ УФ Фггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааTechnical 7Technical 7VѕЋыЌ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггУ УФ Фггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2CDW€@XBAY€CCZ€УCTechnical 1Technical 1W­ЎггггггггTechnical 4Technical 4XѕЏыА ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггУ УФ Фггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааTechnical 3Technical 3YБВггггггггTechnical 2Technical 2ZГДггггггггћџ2{M[BuD\BЗF]FљH^<?KTechnical 6Technical 6[ѕЕыЖ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггУ УФ Фггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааTechnical 5Technical 5\ѕЗыИ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггУ УФ Фггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааDocument 1Document 1]їЙэК ХХааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааХХааRight Par 8Right Par 8^ђЛшМ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0ААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2V_<­M`<щOa<%Rb<aTRight Par 7Right Par 7_ђНшО ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hРАpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааRight Par 6Right Par 6`ђПшР ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И hрРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0ААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааRight Par 5Right Par 5aђСшТ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И ˆhРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааRight Par 4Right Par 4bђУшФ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` И Ј hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0ААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2^c<ЯVd€ Ye<‹Yf<Ч[Right Par 3Right Par 3cђХшЦ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА` P И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааDocument 3Document 3dЧШггггггггRight Par 2Right Par 2eђЩшЪ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXАј` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0ААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааRight Par 1Right Par 1fђЫшЬ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџXА ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ25`g€5^h€Е^i€5_j€Е_Document 7Document 7gЭЮггггггггDocument 2Document 2hЯаггггггггDocument 5Document 5iбвггггггггDocument 6Document 6jгдггггггггћџ2,kkŒg`l€ѓ`mdsanU зaDocument 4Document 4kежггггУУУ УФФФ ФггггDocument 8Document 8lзиггггггггBld/UndBold and Underline TextmйкУ УУУФФФ ФUpdateInitial Codes for Update Modulen§лмб#)a [ PР QXP#бг dn га ААэ# агга ААш[ аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааеэЄб#)a [ PР QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi QXX#бС`љЕ "СLegal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guideƒ УУ ФФ эееуЄб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#бLegal WordPerfect 5.0 Update Class Learning Guide УУ ФФ уееєvб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#б УУ ФФ Copyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988С`…Е AСPage ƒ єееѓvб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#б УУ ФФ Page С`1Е &СCopyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988ƒ ѓећџ2д‡oD ^kpF ЂtqF ш}rІ.‡Style 9Initial Codes for Intermediateoьноб#)a [ PРQXP#бг dn га э#э# аггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааŠа ААц[ аеъЄб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#бС`eЕ %СIntermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guideƒ УУ ФФ ъеерЄб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#бIntermediate Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide УУ ФФ реешб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#б УУ ФФ Copyright РР Portola Systems, Inc.С`…Е AСPage ƒ шееѓб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#б УУ ФФ Page С`1Е &СCopyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988ƒ ѓеStyle 8Initial Codes for Beginningpюпрб#)a [ PРQXP#бг dn га э#э# аггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааа ААц[ аецЄб#)a [ PРQXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiQXX#бС`)Е &СBeginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guideƒ УУ ФФ цеемЄб#)a [ PР QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi!QXX#бBeginning Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide УУ ФФ мееѓб#)a [ PР"QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi#QXX#б УУ ФФ Copyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988С`…Е AСPage ƒ ѓееѓб#)a [ PР$QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi%QXX#б УУ ФФ Page С`1Е &СCopyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988ƒ ѓеStyle 10Initial Codes for Advancedqюстб#)a [ PР&QXP#бг dn га э#э# агга ААш[ аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааехЄб#)a [ PР'QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi(QXX#бС`MЕ 'СAdvanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guideƒ УУ ФФ хеелЄб#)a [ PР)QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi*QXX#бAdvanced Legal WordPerfect Learning Guide УУ ФФ лееєvб#)a [ PР+QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi,QXX#б УУ ФФ Copyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988С`…Е AСPage ƒ єееєvб#)a [ PР-QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi.QXX#б УУ ФФ Page С`1Е &СCopyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988ƒ єеStyle 6Dutch Roman 14 Pointr'у'фб#Ђw [ PР/QМP#бб#)a [ PР0QXP#бћџ2`ŠsІˆtІЌˆuR‰vб‰Style 7Swiss 11.5s'х'цб#)ao> P1QXP#бб#)a [ PР2QXP#бStyle 5Dutch Bold 18 Pointt'ч'шб#T•~> pа3Q„p#бб#)a [ PР4QXP#бStyle 2Dutch Italic 11.5u'щъб#)^ `> Xi5QXX#бStyle 1Dutch Roman 11.5 Fontv7ыьб#)a [ PР6QXP#бг dn гћџ2—wŸ’Šxs1‹yИ ЄŒzІ\–Style 4Swiss 8 Point with MarginswGэюб#Co> P7QP#бг dd га э# я аStyle 3Dutch Roman 11.5 with Margins/Tabsxя№б#)a [ PР8QXP#бг n га  яэ# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааStyle 11Initial Codes for Advanced IIy` ёђб#)a [ PР9QXP#бг dn га э#э# агга ААш[ аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааешЄб#)a [ PР:QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi;QXX#бС`‘Е %СAdvanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guideƒ УУ ФФ шееоЄб#)a [ PР<QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi=QXX#бAdvanced Legal WordPerfect II Learning Guide УУ ФФ оеенvб#)a [ PР>QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> Xi?QXX#б УУ ФФ Copyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988С`…Е AСPage ƒ нееwvаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œвб#)a [ PР@QXP#ба э#э# аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ˜b, ілРЅŠoT9 ш!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#)^ `> XiAQXX#б УУ ФФ Page С`1Е &СCopyright РР Portola Systems, Inc. 1987, 1988ƒ wеStyle 12Dutch Italics 11.5z'ѓ'єб#)^ `> XiBQXX#бб#)a [ PРCQXP#бћџ2Uš{І4—|Хк—}[Ÿ™~[њ™Style 14Swiss 8 Pt Without Margins{'ѕ'іб#Co> PDQP#бб#)a [ PРEQXP#бENVELOPEStandard Business Envelope with Header|mїја їVˆ,џї аа э# А аа АА,А аа8ае'а  А А а 'ег ` га  АА аVERY LARGEVery Large Typestyle}љњУУEXTRA LARGEExtra Large Typestyle~ћќУУћџ2nž[‡š€[тš[=›‚ж˜›LARGELarge Typestyle§ўУУFINEFine Typestyle€џУУSMALLSmall TypestyleУУINVOICE HEADHeading Portion of Math Invoice‚=3а АА аа АX аа9аеа XX аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџаа Сьь*ССРюь$СЉЉег Є гЇа АА аа XX аеа XX аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџаа Сьь*ССРюь$СЉЉећџ2rЃƒ< ž„<мŸ…Ё†I)ЂINVOICE TOTTotals Invoice for Math Macroƒфа Xp, аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ№Ь$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0АџџааINVOICE EXPExpense Subtotals for Math Invoice„фа p,p, аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ№Ь$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0АџџааMEMORANDUMMemo Page Format…Й  а АААА аСрьD*СУУУ УM E M O R A N D U MФ ФФФƒ кy<Щdddyк INVOICE FEEFee Amount for Math Invoice†ё  а p,, аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ№Ь$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ0Аџџааг џ гћџ2†Ї‡“ЄЃˆj7І‰dЁІŠЇLETTERHEADLetterhead - date/margins‡!  а ААXА аа ї3и'џї аг  гСрьь*Са ї3и' IIџї аƒ г  га ААXА аHIGHLIGHT 3Large, Italicized and Underscoredˆ  УУУУУУФФФФФФHIGHLIGHT 2Large and Bold‰УУУ УФ ФФФBLOCK QUOTESmall, single-spaced, indentedŠ ааУУТТФФааћџ2OЌ‹nИЇŒc&Јc‰ЉŽcьЊTITLETitle of a Document‹Срьь*СУУУ УФ ФФФƒLEGAL PORTLegal Portrait - 8.5 x 14Œ а ї Aи' IIџї аа ААА аLETTER PORTLetter Portrait - 8.5 x 11 а ї3и' IIџї аа ААА аLEGAL LANDLegal Landscape - 14 x 8.5Ž а їи' A IIџї аа АААА аћџ21АcЌ‚ф­‘gfЎ’dЭЏLETTER LANDLetter Landscape - 11 x 8.5 а їи'3 IIџї аа АААА аDRAFT OFFTurn Draft Style off* а ААА аееDRAFT ONHeader A Text = DRAFT and Date‘!"а ААXА аа8аеёаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)ŒвС`$ р.DСУУDRAFTФФƒ С` р.DСУУи 3 1, 4 иФФг   гёеHIGHLIGHT 1Italics and Bold’#$УУУ УФ ФФФћџ21Г“ЮcА”д1Б•ЌВ–€БВ65_Equation Caption“;%;&б#XXф2МPБFQXP#бггггггггб#єIф2МPБGQєP#б64endnote reference”>'>(б#Xjє\  PŽHG;XP#бггггУУФФггггб#єXє\  PŽIG;єP#б63footnote text•*) * ааггггг??ггUSгггггаа62Default Paragraph Font–+,ггггггггћџ2ЯЛ—дcØx7Д™ЏЖš?Й61footnote reference—>-.>б#›Vє\  PŽJU›P#бггггУУУУггггб#›Vє\  PŽKU›P#б60˜/'0оааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТТТТб#&n PL&P#бб#&n PM&P#бааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааHEADING 8™'132оааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТТТТб#єXє\  PŽNG;єP#бУУззззб#єXє\  PŽOG;єP#бФФааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааHEADING 9š'334оааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТТТТб#єXє\  PŽPG;єP#бУУззззб#єXє\  PŽQG;єP#бФФааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2ЋС›FМœіGН =ОždGП59Default Paragraph Font›w5w6б#X}xа№PR7ћXP#бггггггггггггггггггггггггггггггггб#&sxа№PS7ћ&P#б_Equation Ca_Equation CaptionœO7O8б#X}xа№PT7ћXP#бггггггггггггггггб#єIф2МPБUQєP#бcaptioncaptionY9O: ааб#X}xа№PV7ћXP#бггггггггггггггггб#єIф2МPБWQєP#бааtoa headingtoa headingž;ќ< ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2mЫŸdнС dAФЁdЅЦЂd Щindex 2index 2Ÿ=ќ> ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ`ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааindex 1index 1 ?ќ@ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА` (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 9toc 9ЁAќB ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ`ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 8toc 8ЂCќD ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2‡гЃМŸЫЄd[ЬЅdПЮІd#бtoc 7toc 7Ѓ2E(F ааггггггггггггггггааtoc 6toc 6ЄGќH ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 5toc 5ЅIќJ ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџh(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 4toc 4ІKќL ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџИ (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааћџ2ялЇdЙгЈdжЉdиЊ хкtoc 3toc 3ЇMќN ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 2toc 2ЈOќP ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ`ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааtoc 1toc 1ЉQќR ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџА(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ`ААааггггггггггггггггааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааendnote textendnote textЊYSOT ааб#X}xа№PX7ћXP#бггггггггггггггггб#єIф2МPБYQєP#бааћџ2ЫоЋЌ!мЌЌЭм­ЌyнЎІ%оArticle headHeadline for new articleЋ*U'Vб#™r„"zpЎZCМ#бУ Уб#с\9Я> (P”[YєP#бФ ФGraphics bodchart data Ќ*W*XУ Уб#Alo> P}\YXP#бб#с\9Я> (P”]YєP#бФ ФGraphics heaHeadlines for graphics­*Y*ZУ Уб#Ђ€o> P}^YМP#бб#с\9Я> (P”_YєP#бФ Ф2nd line Hea2nd line headlineЎ'['\б#bЌУ> p}`Y„#бб#с\9Я> (P”aYєP#бћџ2;тЏІ§оАІЃпБіIрВќ?сHeadlineHeadline for newsletterЏ']'^б#ƒфУ> p}bYА#бб#с\9Я> (P”cYєP#бHighlightMiddle Article HighlightА'_'`б#Ѓ„бG x}dYМ˜#бб#с\9Я> (P”eYєP#бline numberline numberБOaObб#Xjє\  PŽfG;XP#бггггггггггггггггб#єXє\  PŽgG;єP#бendnote refeendnote referenceВRcRdб#Xjє\  PŽhG;XP#бггггггггУУФФггггггггб#єXє\  PŽiG;єP#бћџ2QхГРmтДд-уЕЈфЖЈЉфlistlistГ>ef*ааггггггггг??гааггггг??г58footnote textД>g4h ааггггггггг??ггUSгггггггггааpage numberpage numberЕ2ijааггггггггааггггDefault ParaDefault Paragraph FontЖ(k(lггггггггггггггггћџ2§эЗшƒхИkцЙxьшК™dыfootnote reffootnote referenceЗRmn>б#›Vє\  PŽjU›P#бггггггггУУУУггггб#›Vє\  PŽkU›P#бenumlev1И$oћp ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџpК  N hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТŽŽŽТТŽŽŽТС€aaСб#&n Pl&P#бааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4` И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааб#&n Pm&P#бааNORMAL INDENЙq'rоааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТТТТб#&n Pn&P#бб#&n Po&P#бааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ ф <”ьDœєLЄќ!T$џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааааHEADING 4К0st ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм К ZwРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТщщщТТщщщТС€rrСб#&n Pp&P#бУ Уззззааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааб#&n Pq&P#бФ Фааћџ2ДіЛ™/юМ™Ш№Н™aѓОКњѕHEADING 5Л0uv ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмpК ZwРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТDDDТТDDDТС€Сб#&n Pr&P#бУ Уззззааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааб#&n Ps&P#бФ ФааHEADING 6М0wx ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмpК ZwРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТDDDТТDDDТС€Сб#&n Pt&P#бУ Уззззааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааб#&n Pu&P#бФ ФааHEADING 7Н0yz ааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмpК ZwРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааТDDDТТDDDТС€Сб#&n Pv&P#бУ Уззззааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм4Œ И hРpШ xа (#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџААааб#&n Pw&P#бФ ФааNormalNormalО1{1|ааб#Xjє\  PŽxG;XP#бааб#/аx  € yPX#бћџ2ЅљПКціРћ їС…›јТ… љWord222NullWord222NullП1}1~ааб#/аx  € zPX#бааб#/аx  € {PX#б57Format Downloaded DocumentРЃ€а ААXX аб#P|#ба Ш аб#єXє\  PŽ}G;єP#ба ,А\ аб#Ёdў6X@Щ~7ћє@#б56Technical Document StyleС&‚ССУ Уи‡и . Ф Ф55Technical Document StyleТ&ƒ„ССУ Уи†и . Ф Фћџ2LќУАзљФ”‡њХ•ћЦœАћ54Technical Document StyleУ4…$† УУУ Уззи€и ййййзз ФФСС Ф Ф53Technical Document StyleФ&‡ˆУ Уиƒи ззззСС Ф Ф52Technical Document StyleХ'‰Š У Уи‚и ззззСС Ф Ф51Technical Document StyleЦ*‹Œ У Уии УУззззФФ СС Ф Фћџ2џЧ…~ќШ…§ЩКˆ§ЪбBў50Technical Document StyleЧ&ŽССУ Уи…и . Ф Ф49Technical Document StyleШ&ССУ Уи„и . Ф Ф48Document StyleЩF‘’йй СрьШ*СУУУ Уззи€и ййййззƒ ФФФ Ф47СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЪw“”ССССССССССССССС@pp2Сии ƒС€-СТpppТ ћџ2/ЫШEџЬП ЭЖЬЮ­‚46СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЫn•–ССССССССССССС@-Сии ƒС€РР(СТТ 45СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЬe—˜ССССССССССС@РР(Сии ƒС€hh#СТРРРТ 44СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЭ\™šССССССССС@hh#Сии ƒС€СТhhhТ 43СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЮS›œССССССС@Сии ƒС€И И СТТ ћџ2ЧЯЄaа•б›šв’542СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersЯJžССССС@И И Сии ƒС€` ` СТИ И И Т 41Document Styleа0Ÿ   ССУ Уи‚и зззз Ф Ф40СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersбAЁЂССС@` ` Сии ƒС€СТ` ` ` Т 39СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersв8ЃЄС@Сии ƒС€АА СТТ ћџ2Цгpљд“iеeќжea38СDocument StyleгЅІТТТ` ` ` Т 37Document Styleд*ЇЈ У Уии УУзззз Ф ФФФ36СDocument Styleе ЉЊТТ 35СDocument Styleж ЋЌТТ ћџ2„ зqјиpiйNйк]' 34Document Styleз­ ЎССУ УУУ.ФФ Ф Ф33СDocument StyleиЏАТТТ` ` ` Т footerйћБВћааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#єXє\  PŽG;єP#бааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#єXє\  PŽ€G;єP#бheading 3кГДћааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџаа У УУУб#FxX ц €‚PМCXP#бФ ФФФааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#FxX ц €‚PМ‚CXP#бћџ2ЭлhЖ мнКЋоheheader2лЕ Жћааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` Ра џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ АџџааааУ Уб#FxX ц €‚PМƒCXP#бФ Фааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ` Ра џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ Аџџааб#FxX ц €‚PМ„CXP#бitemizeм*ЗИ а А\АF аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџržџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааТТТТС€Сб#FxX ц €‚PМ…CXP#ба АFАF аааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџržџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#FxX ц €‚PМ†CXP#бreferenceн;ЙК'ТТС€Сб#FxX ц €‚PМ‡CXP#бб#FxX ц €‚PМˆCXP#бheaderоЛ МћааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџРа џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааааУ Уб#FxX ц €‚PМ‰CXP#бФ ФааааџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџРа џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџАџџааб#FxX ц €‚PМŠCXP#бћџ2ИпІџрoЅсћтЉfootnote texп'НО'б#FxX ц €‚PМ‹CXP#бб#FxX ц €‚PМŒCXP#бFootnoteрПРССУУ.ФФФФ.ФФFormat DownlFormat Downloaded DocumentсЃСТа ААXX аб#P#ба Ш аб#єXє\  PŽŽG;єP#ба АFА\ аб#Ёdў6X@Щ7ћє@#бCitatorFormat Secretary's Citator Output FileтQУФб#Ёdў6X@Щ7ћє@#ба ААXX аа А\АX аеќІаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œвб#Ёdў6X@Щ‘7ћє@#ба АXАX аСрє*СЉ ии Љќеааћџ28у…ъф…oхАєц”Є32Technical Document Styleу&ХЦССУ Уи‡и . Ф Ф31Technical Document Styleф&ЧШССУ Уи†и . Ф Ф30Technical Document Styleх4Щ$Ъ УУУ Уззи€и ййййзз ФФСС Ф Ф29Technical Document Styleц&ЫЬУ Уиƒи ззззСС Ф Фћџ2Ѕч•jшœџщ…›ъ… 28Technical Document Styleч'ЭЮ У Уи‚и ззззСС Ф Ф27Technical Document Styleш*Яа У Уии УУззззФФ СС Ф Ф26Technical Document Styleщ&бвССУ Уи…и . Ф Ф25Technical Document Styleъ&гдССУ Уи„и . Ф Фћџ2щ ыКзьб‘эШbюП* 24Document StyleыFежйй СрьШ*СУУУ Уззи€и ййййззƒ ФФФ Ф23СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersьwзиССССССССССССССС@pp2Сии ƒС€-СТpppТ 22СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersэnйкССССССССССССС@-Сии ƒС€РР(СТТ 21СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersюeлмССССССССССС@РР(Сии ƒС€hh#СТРРРТ ћџ2З#яЖ!№­б!ёЄ~"ђ•"#20СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersя\ноССССССССС@hh#Сии ƒС€СТhhhТ 19СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers№SпрССССССС@Сии ƒС€И И СТТ 18СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersёJстССССС@И И Сии ƒС€` ` СТИ И И Т 17Document Styleђ0у ф ССУ Уи‚и зззз Ф Фћџ2&ѓ›щ#є’„$ѕp%і“†%16СRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersѓAхцССС@` ` Сии ƒС€СТ` ` ` Т 15СRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersє8чшС@Сии ƒС€АА СТТ 14СDocument StyleѕщъТТТ` ` ` Т 13Document Styleі*ыь У Уии УУзззз Ф ФФФћџ2і'їeK&јeА&љq'њp†'12СDocument Styleї эюТТ 11СDocument Styleј я№ТТ 10Document Styleљё ђССУ УУУ.ФФ Ф Ф9СDocument StyleњѓєТТТ` ` ` Т ћџ2b*ћ”((ќ–М(§R)ўsя)SubheadingSubheadingћ.ѕ іУ УииССзззз Ф ФRight ParСRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersќ<їјС@Сии ƒг њџ гТТ HeadingChapter Heading§3љ њ СрьШ*СУУУ Уи€и ззззƒ ФФФ ФBullet ListСIndented Bullet ListўћќТТРРТ` ` ` Т ћџ2ŒŒџp”*0ˆa+џџџџHeading 1Centered Headingџ§ўСрьШ*СУУУ Уƒ ФФФ ФЋєXє\  PŽG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєXjє\  PŽG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXXjє\  PŽG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXєXє\  PŽG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєєXє\  PŽG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєXjє\  PŽG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXј ф2pБC 2ф2A€Arial Bold (TT) „Вў6X@ЩC„@;ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)„Xvў6X@ЩCX@;ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)Xеў6X@Щ Cе@;ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)еXvў6X@Щ CX@;ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)X)a [ PР QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PР QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PРQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi!QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР"QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi#QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР$QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi%QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР&QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PР'QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi(QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР)QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi*QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР+QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi,QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР-QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi.QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)XЂw [ PР/QМP$ [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)М)a [ PР0QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)ao> P1QXP)o> €`X)a [ PР2QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XT•~> pа3Q„p#~>  €€*Times New Roman (TT)„)a [ PР4QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi5QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР6QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XCo> P7QP*o> A€`Arial (TT))a [ PР8QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PР9QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)a [ PР:QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi;QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР<QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi=QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР>QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> Xi?QXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PР@QXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)X)^ `> XiAQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)^ `> XiBQXX! `> ш €`6Times New Roman Italic (TT)X)a [ PРCQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XCo> PDQP*o> A€`Arial (TT))a [ PРEQXP" [  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XXXф2МPБFQXP%ф2МA€`Arial (TT)XєIф2МPБGQєP%ф2МA€`Arial (TT)єXjє\  PŽHG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXєXє\  PŽIG;єP%є\  €`&Times New Romanє›Vє\  PŽJU›Pє\  €`*Times New Roman (TT)››Vє\  PŽKU›Pє\  €`*Times New Roman (TT)›&n PL&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n PM&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&єXє\  PŽNG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєєXє\  PŽOG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєєXє\  PŽPG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєєXє\  PŽQG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєX}xа№PR7ћXP,xа№A€`Arial (TT)X&sxа№PS7ћ&P,xа№A€`Arial (TT)&X}xа№PT7ћXP,xа№A€`Arial (TT)XєIф2МPБUQєP%ф2МA€`Arial (TT)єX}xа№PV7ћXP,xа№A€`Arial (TT)XєIф2МPБWQєP%ф2МA€`Arial (TT)єX}xа№PX7ћXP,xа№A€`Arial (TT)XєIф2МPБYQєP%ф2МA€`Arial (TT)є™r„"zpЎZCМ)„"zA€Arial Bold (TT)Мс\9Я> (P”[YєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єAlo> P}\YXP-o> A€`Arial (TT)Xс\9Я> (P”]YєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єЂ€o> P}^YМP.o> A€`Arial (TT)Мс\9Я> (P”_YєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єbЌУ> p}`Y„/У> A€Arial Bold (TT)„с\9Я> (P”aYєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єƒфУ> p}bYА/У> A€Arial Bold (TT)Ас\9Я> (P”cYєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єЃ„бG x}dYМ˜/бG шA€,Arial Bold Italic (TT)Мс\9Я> (P”eYєP'9Я>  €`*Times New Roman (TT)єXjє\  PŽfG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXєXє\  PŽgG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєXjє\  PŽhG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanXєXє\  PŽiG;єP%є\  €`&Times New Romanє›Vє\  PŽjU›Pє\  €`*Times New Roman (TT)››Vє\  PŽkU›Pє\  €`*Times New Roman (TT)›&n Pl&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pm&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pn&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Po&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pp&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pq&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pr&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Ps&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pt&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pu&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pv&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&&n Pw&P* €`*Times New Roman (TT)&Xjє\  PŽxG;XP%є\  €`&Times New RomanX/аx  € yPX<  A€ $Arial (TT)X/аx  € zPX<  A€ $Arial (TT)X/аx  € {PX<  A€ $Arial (TT)XP|єXє\  PŽ}G;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєЁdў6X@Щ~7ћє@<ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)єєXє\  PŽG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєєXє\  PŽ€G;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєFxX ц €‚PМCXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ‚CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМƒCXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ„CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ…CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ†CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ‡CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМˆCXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ‰CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМŠCXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМ‹CXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XFxX ц €‚PМŒCXP*X ц  €`*Times New Roman (TT)XPєXє\  PŽŽG;єP%є\  €`&Times New RomanєЁdў6X@Щ7ћє@<ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)єЁdў6X@Щ7ћє@<ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)єЁdў6X@Щ‘7ћє@<ў6X9€`("Courier New (TT)єћџ2ОŒЦŒ3|jаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)ŒвŠб#Xjє\  PŽG;XP#бУ УУУУ УФФФ ФФ ФеšXаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œвб#Xjє\  PŽG;XP#бУ УСр” ьСFederal Communications CommissionƒС`œ(#CСDA 98Љ828Ф Фƒ кyx™dddyк šеУУУ УУ УФФФ ФФ Фа Ш аУУУ УУ УааФФФ Ф Ф ФСр4ь&СУ УBefore theƒ Ср” ьСFederal Communications Commissionƒ Сркь!СWashington, D.C. 20554Ф Фƒ СССС In the Matter ofСрЪь*С)ƒ СрЪь*С)ƒ Administration of theСрЪь*С)ƒССССCC Docket No. 92Љ237 North American Numbering PlanСрЪь*С)ƒ Carrier Identification Codes (CICs)СрЪь*С)ƒ Срь СУ УDECLARATORY RULING Ф Фƒ У УAdopted:Ф Ф May 1, 1998ТТТhhhТТРРРТ У У ТТReleased:Ф Ф May 1, 1998 У УBy the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: Ср\ь"СI. INTRODUCTIONФ Фƒ ССййи‚иССIn a letter dated March 6, 1998,жЛџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Request for Expedited Declaratory Ruling from Theodore R. Kingsley, General Attorney, BellSouth Corp. (BellSouth), to A. Richard Metzger, Jr., Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 6, 1998 (УУBellSouth RequestФФ). Лж BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth) requests that we clarify the Commission's requirements regarding the blocking of threeЉdigit carrier identification codes (CICs), adopted by the Commission in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ.УУФФжџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, Carrier Identification Codes (CICs), УУOrder on Reconsideration, Order on Application for Review, and Second Further Notice of Proposed RulemakingФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, FCC 97Љ386 (rel. Oct. 22, 1997) (УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ), appeal pending sub. nom, VarTec Telecom, Inc. and Communigroup, Inc. v. FCC, No. 97Љ1706 (D.C. Cir.). Prior to the release of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, the Commission issued a УУFurther Notice of Proposed RulemakingФФ in this docket. УУSeeФФ Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, Carrier Identification Codes (CICs), УУFurther Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and OrderФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, FCC 97Љ364 (rel. Oct. 9, 1997) (УУCICs FNPRMФФ). The issues raised in the УУCICs FNPRMФФ are unrelated to issues we address here.ж Specifically, BellSouth states that it is uncertain as to whether phased blocking of threeЉdigit CICs should be completed by June 30, 1998, or whether it should begin phased blocking on July 1, 1998.жйџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth RequestФФ at 1.йж BellSouth explains that it needs clarification by May 1, 1998, to comply with the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ if the Commission intended that absolutely no threeЉdigit CICs are to pass after June 30, 1998.жйџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth RequestФФ at 2.йж BellSouth requests that the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau), acting pursuant to proper delegated authority, remove the present uncertainty and terminate the controversy concerning the appropriate time to implement phased blocking of threeЉdigit CICs.жФџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа BellSouth acknowledges its earlier filed Petition for Clarification requesting identical clarification of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ. УУPetition for Clarification of BellSouth CorporationФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, November 26, 1997 (УУBellSouth PetitionФФ). It notes that a complete record has been developed on the issue in response to that petition. УУФФУУSeeФФ Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceedings, Notice, Report No. 2242 (Dec. 8, 1997). Four parties, AT&T Corp. (AT&T), MCI Communications Corp. (MCI), the SBC Companies (consisting of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell, and Nevada Bell) and U S WEST, Inc. (U S WEST), filed comments on the УУBellSouth PetitionФФ. Three parties, VarTec Telecom, Inc. (VarTec), MCI and BellSouth, filed reply comments. BellSouth notes that the Notice also pertained to a Petition for Reconsideration filed by America One Communications, Inc., on November 20, 1997. УУSeeФФ УУPetition for Reconsideration of America One Communications, IncФФ. (УУAmerica One PetitionФФ), CC Docket No. 92Љ237, November 20, 1997 (УУAmerica One PetitionФФ). BellSouth states that its request is limited, however, to the controversy over the correct interpretation of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, and not to the merits of the УУAmerica One PetitionФФ. УУФФBellSouth states that its present request is prompted by BellSouth's concern that the full Commission will be unable to act upon its Petition for Clarification by May 1, 1998. Because action by the Bureau will render moot the pending BellSouth Petition for Clarification, BellSouth states that it will formally withdraw that petition if the Bureau acts upon its present request. УУBellSouth RequestФФ at 2.Фж ССи‚иССOn March 18, 1998, MCI filed an УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter with the Bureau seeking to alert the Bureau to the "urgent need to immediately take action to extend the permissive dialing period."жšџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Jonathan B. Sallet, Chief Policy Counsel, MCI, to Richard Metzger, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 17, 1998 (УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ). УУФФšж MCI alleges that "[s]everal significant events" have made it impossible to complete the transition to fourЉdigit CICs by June 30, 1998, as ordered in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ.жAџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1. УУSeeФФ, УУinfraФФ., para. 21, for a discussion of the factors MCI cites to support its request.Aж In addition, MCI objects to the standard intercept message adopted by the Network Interconnection and Interoperability Forum (NIIF) in February 1998 to explain the dialing pattern change necessitated by the conversion to fourЉdigits CICsжмџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа In its October 22, 1997, УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, the Commission directed all LECs to consult with IXCs and reach agreement on the content of a standard intercept message and the period of time during which the message would be offered. The Commission concluded that LECs must begin offering a standard intercept message beginning on or before June 30, 1998, explaining that a dialing pattern change has occurred and instructing the caller to contact its IXC for further action. УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26. мж and requests that the Commission resolve an alleged "impasse" concerning this message.жл џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5.лжУУФФ In an УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter filed on March 23, 1998, VarTec Telecom Inc. (VarTec), on the other hand, requests that the Commission require all local exchange carriers (LECs) to use the NIIF standard intercept message or to file a waiver exempting them from the use of that message.УУФФжй џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФУУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from James U. Troup and Robert H. Jackson, Arter & Hadden, Attorneys for VarTec, to Geraldine Matise, Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 23, 1998 (УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 3.йж VarTec also states that the Commission should mandate that the standard intercept message remain operative for a minimum of six months.жо џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.ож Both MCI and VarTec object to the use of Special Information Tones (SITs) in conjunction with the intercept message.ж џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4; УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3Љ4.ж The Bureau sought comment on the requests from MCI and VarTec in a Public Notice dated March 26, 1998.жл џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Commission Seeks Comment on Requests for Commission Action Filed by MCI Telecommunications Corporation and VarTec Telecom, Inc. Concerning Carrier Identification Codes (CC Docket No. 92Љ237), УУPublic NoticeФФ, DA 98Љ591 (rel. Mar. 26, 1998). Comments were filed by AT&T, Bell Atlantic; BellSouth; Excel Communications, Inc. (Excel); GTE Service Corporation (GTE); Qwest Communications Corporation (QCC); SBC; Sprint Corporation (Sprint); Telecommunications Resellers Association (TRA); U S WEST; United States Telephone Association (USTA).лж ССи‚иССIn this Order, we clarify that the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ requires the transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs to end on June 30, 1998, and that carriers begin blocking threeЉdigit CICs no earlier than July 1, 1998. Further, on our own motion and pursuant to delegated authority,жфџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа 47 C.F.R. РРРР 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291.фж we grant a waiver of the July 1, 1998 deadline for the complete blocking of all threeЉdigit CICs, as required by the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, to allow a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs by carriers, where necessary, with all blocking completed no later than September 1, 1998. In reaching this decision, we take notice of the record developed in response to BellSouth's petition. Further, we find that MCI has presented no new facts on which the Bureau could recommend to the Commission that it reconsider the decision reached in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ to end the permissive dialing period on June 30, 1998. Finally, we conclude that the standard intercept message developed by the NIIF complies with the standard intercept message requirement set by the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ and we decline to interfere with standard industry practices concerning the use of SITs and the duration of the use of the intercept message. Although other intercept messages may be used, we interpret the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ to require that any message used by a LEC must provide instructions with respect to the dialing pattern change and how a call may be properly completed, and direct callers to contact their interexchange carrier (IXC) for further information. We conclude that a message that does not meet these criteria may be an unreasonable practice under section 202(a)жвџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа 47 U.S.C. РР 202(a).вж of the Communications Act of 1934,жџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа 47 U.S.C. РРРР 151 УУetФФ УУseqФФ. УУФФУУФФ("Communications Act" or "Act").ж as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.ж џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104Љ104, 110 Stat. 56 ("1996 Act"). ж У УУУФФФ ФСрrь#СУ УII. BACKGROUNDФ Фƒ ССи‚иССCICs are numeric codes that enable LECs providing interstate interexchange access services to identify the interstate IXC that the originating caller wishes to use to transmit its interstate call.жЊџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Most access providers are incumbent local exchange carriers (incumbent LECs) that provide access customers with circuits that interconnect to the local carrier's public switched telephone network. Commission rules require that "interstate access services should be made available on a nonЉdiscriminatory basis and, as far as possible, without distinction between end user and IC [interexchange carrier] customers." Petition of First Data Resources, Inc., Regarding the Availability of Feature Group B Access Service to End Users, УУMemorandum Opinion and OrderФФ, 1986 WL 291786 (rel. May 28, 1986) at para. 13. Typical access customers include interexchange carriers, wireless carriers, competitive access providers, and large corporate users.Њж LECs use the CICs to route traffic to the proper IXC and to bill for the interstate access service provided. CICs facilitate competition by enabling callers to use the services of telecommunications service providers either by presubscription or by dialing a carrier access code, or CAC, which incorporates the carrier's unique Feature Group D CIC.жiџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Feature Group D access, or "equal access," is known in the industry as "OneЉplus" ("1+") dialing. This type of access allows calls to be routed directly to the caller's carrier of choice. Feature Group D/equal access offers features, including presubscription, not generally available through other forms of access. In 1988, the Industry Carriers Compatibility Forum (ICCF), operating under the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), Carrier Liaison Committee (CLC), began to develop a twoЉpart plan to convert and expand threeЉdigit Feature Group D CICs to four digits. The second part of the plan, originally scheduled to occur in the third quarter of 1993, contemplated expansion of threeЉdigit Feature Group D CICs to four digits and eventual elimination of the 10XXX CAC format. УУSeeФФ Letter of October 13, 1989, from G.J. Handler, Vice President, Network Planning, Bell Communications Research (Bellcore), to Richard M. Firestone, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission at 2 (УУHandler LetterФФ). The ICCF's plan was published in 1991. УУSeeФФ УУExpansion of Carrier Identification Code Capacity for Feature Group D (FGD)ФФ, Bellcore Technical Reference TRЉNWTЉ001050, Issue 1 (April 1991) (ICCF Expansion Plan, April 1991). In 1994, the expansion of Feature Group D CICs was scheduled for the first quarter of 1995. УУSeeФФ Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, УУNotice of Proposed RulemakingФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, 9 FCC Rcd 2068, 2076 (1994) (УУCICs NPRMФФ). In January 1997, the ICCF became part of the Network Interconnection Interoperability Forum (NIIF), which also operates under the auspices of the CLC.iж Originally, CICs were unique threeЉdigit codes (XXX) and CACs were fiveЉdigit codes incorporating the CIC (10XXX). ŒССи‚иССOn April 11, 1997, in the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ,ж‘џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, Carrier Identification Codes (CICs), УУSecond Report and OrderФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, FCC 97Љ125 (rel. Apr. 11, 1997) (УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ).‘ж the Commission approved an industry plan to expand Feature Group D CICs from three to four digits on the ground that it was a reasonable method of meeting future demand for CICs as the supply of threeЉdigit codes was exhausted.жѕџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ at para. 28.ѕж The industry agreed that as the expansion from three to fourЉdigit CICs occurred, and as carriers replaced their fiveЉdigit CACs with sevenЉdigit CACs, a transition, or permissive dialing period, was needed.жрџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУHandler LetterФФ at 2.рж УУФФIn the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ, because of the rapidly depleting pool of available threeЉdigit CICs, the Commission decided to end the transition on January 1, 1998. The Commission also denied requests to "grandfather" (УУi.e.ФФ, to permit carriers to continue to use) previously assigned threeЉdigit CICs that are in use at the end of the transition.жѕџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ at para. 46.ѕж The Commission's decisions were intended to advance the proЉcompetitive objectives of the Communications Act. ССи‚иССOn October 22, 1997, in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, the Commission modified the decision in the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ regarding the length of the transition during which three and fourЉdigit Feature Group D CICs coЉexist, and created a "twoЉstep" end to the transition to fourЉdigit CICs.жёџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at paras. 20Љ26.ёж Under the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, all LECs that provide equal access must have completed switch changes to recognize fourЉdigit CICs by January 1, 1998, the end of the first phase.жшџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФУУSeeФФ УУidФФ. at paras. 20, 25. шж The second phase, which ends on June 30, 1998, is intended to allow interexchange carriers time to prepare their networks for, and educate their customers about, the replacement of threeЉdigit CICs by fourЉdigit CICs.жќџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at paras. 20, 25. ќж After June 30, 1998, only fourЉdigit CICs and sevenЉdigit CACs will be used.жмџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ. at para. 20.мж The Commission also affirmed its decision in the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ not to grandfather the use of threeЉdigit CICs and fiveЉdigit CACs that are in use during the transition.ж№џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at paras. 47Љ75.№ж In addition, the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ directed all LECs to offer a standard intercept message to inform callers that a dialing pattern change has occurred, as a result of the expansion from three to fourЉdigit CICs, and to instruct the caller to contact its interexchange carrier for further information. The intercept message must be offered on or before June 30, 1998.жџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа "[P]ursuant . . . to our general rulemaking authority, we conclude that, at a minimum, LECs must offer a standard intercept message beginning on or before June 30, 1998, explaining that a dialing pattern change has occurred and instructing the caller to contact its IXC for further information. In developing an intercept message, LECs must consult with IXCs and reach agreement on the content of the message and on the period of time during which the message will be provided. We leave to resolution by the parties decisions about who should have the ultimate responsibility for determining the content of the intercept message and the period of time during which the message must be offered. The Commission will resolve any disputes arising form parties' inability to reach agreement on such matters. Finally, we conclude that the determination on how best to cover the costs of providing an intercept message should be left to individual LECs, including whether their access customers should be charged a reasonable fee to cover those costs." УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ж ССи‚иССIn response to petitions filed by small LECs seeking waivers of the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ's January 1, 1998 conversion deadline, the Bureau's Network Services Division (Division) granted extensions of the conversion deadline.в ШX0УУФФШX0УУФФ вжИџџб#єXє\  PŽG;єP#баавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФ Petitions for Waiver of the FourЉDigit Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Implementation Schedule, УУOrderФФ, NSD File Nos. 97Љ53, 97Љ56, 97Љ46, 97Љ51, 97Љ54, 97Љ55, 97Љ47, 97Љ48, 97Љ49, 97Љ50, DA 97Љ2528 (rel. Dec. 3, 1997) (УУFirst CICs Waiver OrderФФ); УУOrderФФ, NSD File Nos. 97Љ52, 97Љ58, 97Љ57, 97Љ62, 97Љ61, DA 97Љ2614 (rel. Dec. 15, 1997) (УУSecond CICs Waiver OrderФФ); УУOrderФФ, NSD File Nos. 97Љ74, 97Љ63, 97Љ78, 97Љ75, 97Љ66, 97Љ67, 97Љ65, 97Љ68, 97Љ73, 97Љ70, 97Љ72, 97Љ76, 97Љ64, 97Љ71, 97Љ69, DA 97Љ2691 (rel. Dec. 24, 1997) (УУThird CICs Waiver OrderФФ); УУOrderФФ, NSD File Nos. 97Љ80, 97Љ81, 97Љ82, 97Љ83, 97Љ84, 97Љ86, DA 97Љ2717 (rel. Dec. 31, 1997) (УУFourth CICs Waiver OrderФФ); УУOrderФФ, NSD File No. 97Љ87, DA 98Љ29 (rel. Jan. 8, 1998) (УУFifth CICs Waiver OrderФФ). Hardy Telecommunications Request for Extension of Waiver of the FourЉDigit Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Implementation Schedule, УУOrderФФ, NSD File No. 98Љ18 (rel. Mar. 30, 1998) (УУSixth CICs Waiver OrderФФ); Pierce Telephone Company, Inc. Request for Extension of Waiver of the FourЉDigit Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Implementation Schedule, УУOrderФФ, NSD File No. 98Љ51 (rel. Apr. 9, 1998).Иж The Division also granted a waiver request of a small LEC, to permit it not to process threeЉdigit CICs (and fiveЉdigit CACs) for the remainder of the permissive dialing period.ж‹џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Request for Waiver of FiveЉDigit Carrier Access Code (CAC) Dialing During the Permissive Dialing Period, УУOrderФФ, NSD File No. 97Љ85, DA 98Љ160 (rel. Jan. 28, 1998) (УУBorder to Border Waiver OrderФФ).‹ж У УУУХХФФФ ФСрЪь#СУ УIII. DISCUSSIONФ Фƒ ССУ УA. PhaseЉOut of ThreeЉDigit CICsФ ФСС УУФФССи‚иССIn its petition, BellSouth asks the Commission to clarify that it intended that threeЉdigit CICs remain permissive for all carriers and their customers during the entire period of the second phase of the twoЉstep transition, УУi.eФФ., until June 30, 1998. Specifically, ХХBellSouth asks that the Commission clarify that BellSouth may, consistent with the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ: (1) begin a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs on July 1, 1998; and (2) maintain effective tariffs for threeЉdigit CIC call routing and charges occurring on or after July 1, 1998, to cover calls completed during the phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs.жф џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУBellSouth PetitionФФ at 4.фж In the alternative, if the Commission intended that, after July 1, 1997, no calls could be completed using threeЉdigit CICs, BellSouth asks that the Commission clarify that: (1) BellSouth may, consistent with the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, begin a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs within its central offices on May 1, 1998, and block calls made using threeЉdigit CICs without liability; and (2) IXCs must notify their customers that calls made using threeЉdigit CICs may not be possible in all parts of BellSouth's service territory after May 1, 1998.жЯ!џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ.Яж УУФФССи‚иССBellSouth states that it believes the Commission intended, in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, to allow customers to dial either a fourЉdigit CIC or a threeЉdigit CIC with the assurance that their calls will complete for the entire period of permissive dialing, rather than that phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs must begin before the end of the permissive dialing period so that after July 1, 1998, absolutely no call will complete using a threeЉdigit CIC.жж"џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ at 2Љ3.жж BellSouth argues that it can only accomplish threeЉdigit CIC blocking in a phased manner because "as a matter of engineering, threeЉdigit CIC blocking cannot be flashЉcut in each and every BST switch."жг#џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 2 and n.5.гж BellSouth asks for clarification to enable it to determine when to begin the phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, which, according to BellSouth, will take two months.жЫ$џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 2.Ыж BellSouth states that if the Commission agrees with its interpretation of the Commission's intent, on July 1, 1998, it plans to begin a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, with completion of the blocking process in all of its central offices by September 1, 1998.жЯ%џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ.Яж BellSouth asserts that, after September 1, 1998, calls will be able to be routed through BellSouth's central offices only if a fourЉdigit CIC is used. If the Commission intended that no call could complete using a threeЉdigit CIC after July 1, 1998, however, BellSouth states that it must begin its phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs on May 1, 1998.жЯ&џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ.Яж BellSouth warns that threeЉdigit CIC dialing would no longer be "permissive" during the last two months of the transition, which, it asserts, would "frustrate the permissive dialing period and frustrate IXC efforts to educate customers on when fourЉdigit CICs must be used."жЫ'џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 3.ЫжŒ™ССи‚иССIn УУexФФ УУparteФФ letters dated April 1 and April 15, 1998, BellSouth further explains the need for a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs.жЈ(џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Ben G. Almond, Vice PresidentЉFederal Regulatory, BellSouth, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 1, 1998 (УУBellSouth April 1 Ex Parte LetterФФ); УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Theodore R. Kingsley, General Attorney, BellSouth, to Geraldine A. Matise, Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 15, 1998 (УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ).Јж According to BellSouth, it must complete translations work in over 850 switches for fourЉdigit CIC implementation.ж№)џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.УУФФ№ж In an additional 750 plus remote switches, the actual translations changes are performed in the associated host switches.жї*џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Attachment to УУBellSouth April 1 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1.їж BellSouth explains that because of the volume and complex nature of the required translations work, a flash cut approach to threeЉdigit CIC blocking is not possible. BellSouth reports that 139 of its switches do not have a preprogramming feature and therefore cannot be preprogrammed to convert to threeЉdigit CIC blocking on a July 1, 1998, flash cut.жі+џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФУУФФУУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.іж Even where its switches possess a preprogramming capability, however, BellSouth asserts that a phased implementation is the more appropriate way to implement threeЉdigit CIC blocking.жъ,џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.ъж For example, BellSouth states that its 269 Nortel DMS 100 and 100/200 switches have a batch file type preprogramming feature. BellSouth does not advocate the use of this feature for three key reasons: (1) its technicians have not been trained on the preprogramming procedure and it is not comfortable with using the procedure for a project of this magnitude; (2) translation changes in these switches are done in the "Standard Pretranslators" and must be done against every existing threeЉdigit CIC; and, (3) any work done in a preprogramming file requires the same amount of input time as required for the switch.жь-џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2Љ3.ьж Similar reasons underlie BellSouth's reluctance to use the preprogramming feature in its 41 DMS 10 Switches, and in its 414 switches manufactured by Lucent.жЭ.џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 3Љ4.Эж In sum, BellSouth asserts that it takes more time to use preprogramming features than to phase in the switch translations.жЫ/џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 4.Ыж ССи‚иССBellSouth states that the time needed to perform the translation changes will vary from an average of less than one hour for 5ESS and 1A switches to an average of six hours for other switch types.жї0џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Attachment to УУBellSouth April 1 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1.їж BellSouth estimates the total time required to complete the blocking of threeЉdigit CICs at 3,054.5 hoursжњ1џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 2; УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.њж BellSouth notes that this estimate does not reflect administrative activities and time required to process the work request documents that are provided to the translations work centers.жЫ2џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 1.Ыж BellSouth further notes that, although it has ten centers located throughout its nineЉstate territory that perform all switch translations work necessary for BellSouth's switches, those translations centers must handle concurrently not only the work required for threeЉdigit CIC blocking but all other required switch translations activities as well.жЦ3џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. Цж Those ongoing activities include, according to BellSouth, new NXX/NPA activations, new or modification of interexchange carriers' CICs, new or modification of trunking/traffic routing for competitive LECs (CLECs), and new or modification of translations for Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) customers.жХ4џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж BellSouth asserts that a two month phaseЉout period will permit it to "properly manage the tremendous workloads involved with all of these activities, not to mention implementation of local number portability."жХ5џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж ССи‚иССAll except one of the parties commenting on BellSouth's petition support its interpretation of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ as intending that threeЉdigit CICs remain permissive for all carriers and their customers during the entire period of the second phase of the twoЉstep transition.в ШX0УУФФШX0УУФФ вжЁ6џџб#єXє\  PŽG;єP#баавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)ŒвУ УФ Ф УУФФ УУSeeФФ УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 1Љ2; УУVarTec Reply CommentsФФ at 2; УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at 2Љ3; УУMCI Reply CommentsФФ at 4Љ5. In addition, America One, in its УУexФФ УУparteФФ presentation regarding its own petition for reconsideration, stated that does not oppose the BellSouth petition, "to the extent that BellSouth envisions that the end offices cutovers will begin in earnest beginning promptly on July 1, 1998, that intercept messages will be interposed by LECs on that date informing customers not to dial three (3) digit CICs, and that virtually all end office conversions will be completed within a short time thereafter." УУAmerica One Ex Parte FilingФФ at 2.Ёж Parties supporting BellSouth's position argue, for example, that the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ should be interpreted as providing for a "full permissive dialing period"жй7џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at 2.йж during which customers can use threeЉdigit CICsжц8џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУVarTec Reply CommentsФФ at 2цж and benefit from carriers' education efforts.жщ9џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 2. щж They also support BellSouth's position that a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, rather than a flashЉcut conversion to recognize only fourЉdigit CICs, is necessary.жы:џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 1Љ2. ыж GTE claims that it has more than 1600 switches that will need database updates with five different manufacturers represented in its inventory.жŠ;џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from F. Gordon Maxson, Director, Regulatory Affairs, GTE, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 9, 1998 (УУGTE Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 1.Šж GTE estimates that the required database changes in its switches, which require entering translations in tables for each carrier and rerouting any 10XXX dialing from the carrier's trunk group to the new required standard intercept message, will exceed 7,600 hours of activity over a period of two to three months.жл<џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУGTE Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1.лж Moreover, although its 150 5ЉESS switches may have a preprogramming capability, its more than 700 Nortel switches do not.жХ=џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж Similarly, SBC contends that although it can complete its conversion of 1AESS and 5EASS switches by July 25, 1998, conversion of the more complex Nortel DMS 100 switches cannot be completed properly in less than 35 working days.ж>џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Lincoln E. Brown, DirectorЉ Federal Regulatory, SBC, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 2, 1998 (УУSBC Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 1.ж SBC maintains that the remainder of the two month implementation period will be spent in testing to prevent any adverse impact on customers.жЦ?џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. Цж U S WEST contends that it will require approximately 900Љ1000 hours to complete the work to block the dialing of threeЉdigit CICs in its 1,422 end office switches.жЅ@џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Eldridge A. Stafford, Executive DirectorЉFederal Regulatory, U S WEST to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 9, 1998 (УУU S WEST Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 1Љ2.Ѕж Because the work must be scheduled during offЉhours, to minimize the impact of any possible service impairments that might occur, U S WEST states that it will require approximately three months to complete all implementation work.жЫAџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 2.Ыж Only AT&T opposes BellSouth's interpretation, and suggests that if a phasedЉout of threeЉdigit CICs is necessary, that carriers begin this phaseЉout before June 30, 1998.жпBџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУAT&T CommentsФФ at 3.пж ССи‚иССУ УФ ФWe hereby clarify that the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ УУФФrequires that threeЉdigit CICs remain permissive for the entire permissive dialing period, up to, and including, June 30, 1998. Because the record reflects varying interpretations of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, we clarify that blocking threeЉdigit CICs prior to July 1, 1998 is prohibited. This clarification, like the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, applies to all LECs providing equal access.жЗCџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 25. U S WEST and VarTec ask that the Commission apply any clarification to all "affected" (U S WEST) or "involved" (VarTec) LECs. УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at 3; УУVarTec Reply CommentsФФ at 2.Зж ССи‚иССWe also agree that a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs may be necessary for some carriers. No party raised this issue in the rulemaking proceedings addressing the length of the transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs, however,жаDџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, УУNotice of Proposed RulemakingФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, 9 FCC Rcd 2068 (1994); Further Comments, Carrier Identification Codes, УУPublic NoticeФФ, CC Docket No. 92Љ237, DA 96Љ678 (Common Carrier Bureau, April 30, 1996).ажor in response to petitions for reconsideration of the УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ. The УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, therefore, does not address a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs. Instead, it requires LEC switches to have completed conversion to accept only fourЉdigit CICs on July 1, 1998. As discussed below, we find that a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs over a short period of time is reasonable and we grant a twoЉmonth waiver of the requirement set forth in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ for that purpose. ССи‚иССThe Commission established the permissive dialing to allow carriers time to upgrade their networks for, and educate their customers about, sevenЉdigit CAC dialing, and to allow callers time to adjust to the dialing changes.жѕEџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУCICs Second Report and OrderФФ at para. 27.ѕж In granting waivers to small LECs of the January 1, 1998 switch conversion deadline, the Division correctly stated that the LECs' "networks can, and will continue to, accept CAC calling for IXCs with threeЉdigit CICs until the transition ends on June 30, 1998."жўFџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ, УУe.g.ФФ, УУSecond CICs Waiver OrderФФ at para. 19.ўж We agree with parties arguing that, if LECs were to begin a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs prior to June 30, 1998, it would shorten the sixЉmonth second phase of the twoЉstep transition.жGџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУMCI CommentsФФ at 3; УУBellSouth Reply CommentsФФ at 2Љ3.ж Accordingly, we decline to allow carriers to begin blocking threeЉdigit CICs prior to that date. Œ™ССи‚иССWe find reasonable, and the record supports, BellSouth's suggestion that we allow a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, beginning July 1, 1998. The record establishes that the translations work required to complete threeЉdigit CIC blocking is complex and timeЉintensive.жHџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ, УУe.g.ФФ, Attachment to УУBellSouth April 1 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.ж Preprogramming of switches to block threeЉdigit CICs is not possible in all instances,жIџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4; УУSBC Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1.ж and even where technically feasible, a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs may be more appropriate.жъJџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth April 15 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.ъж The majority of parties agrees with BellSouth that a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs is necessary. VarTec, like BellSouth, asserts that this process will take two months.жзKџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec CommentsФФ at 2.зж U S WEST asserts that it "will face the same factual situation" as BellSouth and estimates that U S WEST will require approximately three months to complete all its offices.жўLџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at 2; УУU S WEST Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.ўж The SBC companies assert that it will take "some period of time" to ensure that each switch, particularly DMSЉ100 switches, is updated to preclude recognition of the 10XXX dialing pattern, to ensure that each office is converted, to coordinate with carriers as they convert their trunk groups to fourЉdigit CICs, and to ensure that an appropriate message is played to callers who attempt to use a threeЉdigit CIC.жMџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 2; УУSBC Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1Љ2.ж Like BellSouth,жјNџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Attachment to УУBellSouth April 1 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1. јж the SBC Companies also note various other mandated implementations, such as local number portability, area code splits, and other local competition related items, that are scheduled to occur in 1998.жХOџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж ССи‚иССWe disagree with AT&T's argument that granting BellSouth's petition, requiring that no threeЉdigit CIC blocking occur prior to July 1, 1998, and allowing a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs to begin on that date, would, in effect, extend the transition.жДPџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУAT&T Opposition to BellSouth PetitionФФ at 3Љ4. MCI argues that the record on BellSouth's petition indicates that an extension of the permissive dialing period is necessary. УУMCI Reply CommentsФФ at 2. MCI's argument is addressed below. Дж The Commission has not departed from its decision that the permissive dialing period will end on June 30, 1998. Thus, IXCs should be preparing their networks for, and educating their customers about, the changes that take effect on that date. Although we recognize AT&T's concerns about dialing disparity, we believe that, in this instance, those concerns are unwarranted.жяQџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУAT&T Opposition to BellSouth PetitionФФ at 3Љ4.яж ССи‚иССThroughout this proceeding, we have acknowledged that, during the transition, customers of some carriers may access them by dialing fiveЉdigit CACs while customers of other carriers must dial sevenЉdigit CACs. We agree with BellSouth and U S WEST that after June 30, 1998, most callers will cease dialing fiveЉdigit CACs because they will have been advised of the dialing pattern change.жRџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth Reply CommentsФФ at 3; УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at 2Љ3. ж We recognize that, during the phaseЉoutЉperiod, some customers may inadvertently succeed in reaching their carrier by dialing a fiveЉdigit CAC. We conclude, however, that the concerns about dialing disparity are outweighed by the evidence that flashЉcut blocking of threeЉdigit CICs is not possible and the importance of maintaining the complete permissive dialing period. ССи‚иССMCI conditions its support of BellSouth's petition on the imposition of a Commission requirement that all LECs that are planning a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, including those who received extensions of time to upgrade to fourЉdigit CIC capability, be required to publicly disclose their preЉimplementation and quality control plans.жжSџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI CommentsФФ at 4Љ5.жж MCI argues that this disclosure will encourage the coordinated conversion from three to fourЉdigit CICs anticipated by the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ.жЫTџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 5.Ыж Specifically, MCI requests that, at a minimum, the LECs provide weekly updates of plans to reconfigure particular end offices (at least 60 days in advance of the date by which the LEC intends to reconfigure an office), explanations as to which plans were not met and why, and any changes to plans and reasons for them.жЫUџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ. at 5.Ыж ССи‚иССWe also reject, and there is no record support for, MCI's argument that we should require LECs publicly to disclose their preЉimplementation and quality control plans.жŠVџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУMCI CommentsФФ at 4Љ5; УУBellSouth Reply CommentsФФ at 4Љ5. MCI also raises this argument in its УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter of March 17, 1998. УУSeeФФ УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5Љ6.Šж MCI's main concern is that absent the requested disclosure, "LECs could simply transition end offices at their leisure, without notifying MCI of dates and transition times . . . caus[ing] substantial disruption to MCI's educational efforts throughout the country."жWџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Reply CommentsФФ at 3Љ4; УУseeФФ УУalsoФФ УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 6.ж We disagree. Our waiver of the requirement УУФФthat all LECs complete blocking of threeЉdigit CICs on July 1, 1998, to allow for a phaseЉout,жсXџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ, paras. 13Љ16, УУsupraФФ.сж should have no impact whatsoever on the educational efforts of MCI and other IXCs. To the contrary, from a customerЉeducation standpoint, the September 1, 1998 date is irrelevant. IXCs should be, and must continue to, inform their customers of the dialing pattern change that will take effect on July 1, 1998. IXCs' educational efforts should be completed by July 1, 1998, on the assumption that only fourЉdigit CICs and sevenЉdigit CACs will be accepted by LECs' networks. The fact that some dwindling percentage of calls dialed with a threeЉdigit CIC may complete during the phaseЉout period should not delay or impede the customer education efforts of IXCs. ССи‚иССУУФФVarTec and MCI have again argued that the transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs should be extended beyond June 30, 1998.У УФ Фж,YџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФУУVarTec Reply CommentsФФ at 2; УУMCI Reply CommentsФФ at 2; УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ, УУpassimФФ.,ж VarTec merely states that it supports extending the transition to educate more thoroughly consumers and to modify equipment, but provides no further support for its argument.жпZџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Reply CommentsФФ at 2. пж VarTec later notes, however, that if "ILEC impediments to customer education are moved soon, there will be no need to extend further the conversion to sevenЉdigit carrier access codes."жЊ[џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Robert H. Jackson, Arter & Hadden, Attorneys for VarTec, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 14, 1998 (УУVarTec April 14 Ex Parte LetterФФ), Attachment at 3.Њж MCI argues that uncertainty and unexpected events highlighted in the record on BellSouth's petition warrant extension of the permissive dialing period.жм\џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Reply CommentsФФ at 1Љ2.мж In its УУexФФ УУparteФФ filing, MCI argues that "[i]n recent weeks, several obstacles to the completion of the transition by June 30 have arisen."жл]џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2.лж MCI references three alleged obstacles: (1) an "impasse" over the intercept message to be provided by LECs to inform callers that their threeЉdigit CIC call cannot be completed as dialed; (2) the Commission's failure to act upon the УУBellSouth PetitionФФ, with the end of the permissive dialing period fast approaching; and, (3) the grant of several LECs' petitions for extension of the January 1, 1998, date by which they must upgrade their switches to accommodate fourЉdigit CICs, which according to MCI, "has resulted in a hodgeЉpodge of transition dates across the country."жў^џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2. Although MCI claims in its March 17, 1998 УУexФФ УУparteФФ filing that obstacles to the completion of the transition by June 30 have arisen in "recent weeks," it УУФФУУФФpresents no new facts. Indeed, apart from its claim that an "impasse" exists on the intercept message issue, which we address below, each of the points it presents УУФФУУФФin its March 17, 1998 УУexФФ УУparteФФ was raised directly in its comments or reply comments on the УУBellSouth PetitionФФ, filed December 4, 1997, and January 4, 1998, respectively..ўж In an УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter filed on April 10, 1998, УУФФExcel simply repeats MCI's arguments.жК_џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Dana Frix, Pamela Arluk, Swidler & Berlin, Counsel for Excel Communications, Inc., to Richard Metzger, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications, dated April 10, 1998 (УУExcel Ex Parte LetterФФ).УУФФУУФФ Кж ССи‚иССNeither the УУBellSouth PetitionФФ nor BellSouth's request for declaratory ruling raise the issue whether the permissive dialing period should be extended, either explicitly or implicitly. Although the issue was raised in comments and УУexФФ УУparteФФ presentations, no party has presented any new facts or legal basis on which we could recommend to the Commission that it reconsider its decision to end the permissive dialing period on June 30, 1998. Moreover, we continue to be concerned about the dialing disparity that exists when both three and fourЉdigit CICs are in use, that a sufficient number of CICs remains available for assignment during the transition, and the harm that is caused by uncertainty as to when the transition will end.жЯ`џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ, УУe.g.ФФ, УУAmerica One PetitionФФ; УУФФУУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Norina Moy, Director, Federal Regulatory Policy and Coordination, Sprint, to Richard Metzger, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, dated March 27, 1998 (УУSprint Ex Parte LetterФФ); УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Rachel J. Rothstein, Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs, Cable & Wireless, Inc., to Richard Metzger, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 10, 1998 (УУCWI Ex Parte LetterФФ). Яж To eliminate any confusion, we clarify that the June 30, 1998 end of the permissive dialing period will not be extended. ССи‚иССIn sum, because no party affirmatively opposes BellSouth's assertion that a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs is necessary, or the amount of time BellSouth asserts it needs to complete the process, we find reasonable BellSouth's suggestion that the process may take two months. On the basis of the record before us in response to the УУBellSouth PetitionФФ, we find it reasonable to allow LECs a period of time in which to phaseЉout threeЉdigit CICs. We, therefore, grant a waiver of the July 1, 1998 deadline for the complete blocking of all threeЉdigit CICs, as required by the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, to allow a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs by carriers, where necessary, with all blocking completed no later than September 1, 1998. We require that all such LECs complete the phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs as expeditiously as possible, and no later than September 1, 1998.жђaџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа We note that all LECs must file a network change notification pursuant to section 251(c)(5) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. РР 251(c)(5), as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with the Commission's rules governing short term public notices of network changes. УУSeeФФ 47 C.F.R. РРРР 51.325 through 51.335.ђж We recognize that until nationwide blocking of threeЉdigit CICs is completed, the possibility exists that some calls made inadvertently using fiveЉdigit CACs may terminate. We expect, therefore, that LECs will begin the phaseЉout immediately on July 1, 1998, and continue the process diligently and efficiently, seeking to complete the phaseЉout as soon as possible after that date, but certainly no later than September 1, 1998. As BellSouth requested in its petition, we also allow each LEC to maintain effective tariffs for threeЉdigit CIC call routing and charges occurring between July 1, 1998 and the date the LEC completes threeЉdigit CIC blocking.жкbџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth PetitionФФ at 4.кж This will allow these LECs to recover costs for calls completed during the phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs. Consistent with our waiver to allow all threeЉdigit CICs to be phasedЉout no later than September 1, 1998, we also require that any tariffs or charges for threeЉdigit CIC call routing cease by that date. ХХССУ УB. Standard Intercept MessageФ ФХХ ССи‚иССIn the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, in an effort to ensure a smooth transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs, УУФФthe Commission set a requirement that LECs offer a standard intercept message, beginning on or before June 30, 1998.жьcџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ьж Although it left to LECs, consulting with IXCs, decisions about the precise content of the intercept message and the period of time during which the message must be offered, the Commission required that any intercept message explain that a dialing pattern change has occurred and instruct the caller to contact its IXC for further information.жХdџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж ССи‚иССOn February 11, 1998, the NIIF reached consensus that the following intercept message was to be deployed within the networks concerning the dialing pattern change resulting from the transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs: ТТ"Your call cannot be completed as dialed. It you dialed a 5 digitЉcode, it has changed. Please redial adding a one and a zero before the 5 digit code, or for assistance contact the carrier you are trying to use." The NIIF is a subcommittee of the CLC, sponsored by ATIS.жкeџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ, УУsupraФФ., n.19.кж ATIS is, in turn, a standards body accredited by the American National Standards Institute. Industry representatives from 6 IXCs,жэfџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа MCI, AT&T, Sprint, WorldCom, VarTec, and Stentor.эж 15 LECs,жgџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа U S WEST, Bell Atlantic, Ameritech, BellSouth, SBC, Pacific Bell, GTE, Bell Canada, Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Cincinnati Bell, Southern New England Telephone (SNET), Sprint Local, and TeleHub.ж 2 trade associations,ж#hџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) and United States Telephone Association (USTA).#ж 6 switch manufacturersжPiџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа AGCS, Northern Telecom (Nortel), Lucent, Siemens StrombergЉCarlson (Siemens), Alcatel Network Systems, Inc. (Alcatel), and DSC Communications (DSC).Pж and one research organizationжлjџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа Bell Communications Research. лж participated in the NIIF proceedings that resulted in the development of the CICs standard intercept message. ССи‚иССMCI participated in the NIIF proceedings, but nonetheless disagrees with the intercept message developed by the industry participants through the industry consensus process. In its March 17, 1998, УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter, MCI requests that the Commission order the removal of "extraneous and unnecessary language" from the NIIFЉdeveloped intercept message. Specifically, MCI requests that the Commission order the removal of the first sentence from the NIIFЉapproved message.жлkџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3.лж MCI asserts that the language is unnecessary because the noncompletion of the call alerts the consumer to the fact that the call cannot be completed as dialed.жнlџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3Љ4.нж MCI contends that LECs are intentionally attempting to discourage consumers from accessing IXC services through the use of the first sentence in the intercept message, thereby perpetuating their monopolies in the intraLATA toll market as long as possible, to the detriment of the public interest.жлmџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.лж ССи‚иССIn its March 23, 1998, УУexФФ УУparteФФ letter, VarTec, on the other hand, УУФФrequests УУФФthat the Commission take action to ensure that all LECs use the NIIFЉdeveloped standard intercept message.жсnџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2Љ5.сж VarTec argues that the Commission has already made the use of the NIIF standard intercept message mandatory for all LECs and states that any LEC choosing not to employ the NIIFЉdeveloped message should apply for a waiver of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ.жпoџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3.пж VarTec notes that GTE, Sprint Local, and SNET have each stated that they will not use the NIIF standard intercept language.жЃpџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3Љ4. Sprint disputes VarTec's claim, stating that it has decided to adopt the NIIF message and asserting that GTE and SNET have also decided to use the NIIF message. УУSprint CommentsФФ at 2Љ3. Ѓж VarTec further requests that the intercept message remain operative for a minimum of six months to ensure that customers are educated properly regarding the dialing pattern change.жоqџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.ож ССи‚иССBoth VarTec and MCI object to the use of SITs in conjunction with the intercept message.жrџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4Љ5; УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5..ж VarTec explains that SITs are machineЉdetectable audio tones that identify and precede networkЉprovided intercept messages and allow various automated devices to distinguish between live and recorded voices.жоsџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5.ож VarTec claims, however, that because SITs also are used to alert customers that a recorded message follows, it is concerned that callers may simply hang up the phone before hearing the complete message.жоtџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5.ож VarTec notes that the educational purpose of the intercept message fails if callers hang up without hearing the announcement.жоuџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5.ож MCI states that its research demonstrates that a high number of callers hang up immediately upon hearing SITs and that these callers do not wait to hear the recorded announcement.жлvџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.лж On this basis, MCI and VarTec allege that the use of SITs in conjunction with the intercept message would be devastating to dial around carriers because customer would be unable to complete their long distance dialЉaround calls and therefore blame their IXCs.жwџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2, 5; УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.ж ССи‚иССWhile we have some question about the necessity of including the first sentence of the NIIFЉagreed message, we decline to order its removal. We find that the NIIF message reasonably accomplishes the goal of educating consumers about the dialing pattern change necessitated by the conversion to fourЉdigit CICs and that MCI has not offered any evidence to bolster its claim that some callers will hang up immediately upon hearing that their call "cannot be completed as dialed."жсxџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУSprint CommentsФФ at 3.сж Indeed, Bell Atlantic claims that the industry considers this information "affirmatively helpful"жтyџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 2 n.6.тж and AT&T notes that the first sentence of the NIIFЉproposed message is a standard feature of recorded announcements for area code and other dialing pattern changes and provides truthful and precise information.жзzџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУAT&T CommentsФФ at 3Љ4.зж ССи‚иССMore important, is the fact that the NIIF message was developed by industry working together to reach a consensus. We decline, consistent with the position of the majority of commenting parties, to disturb this consensus agreement simply because one party to the process disagrees with the end result of the process.жŠ{џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУ AT&T CommentФФs at 4;УУ Bell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 1Љ2; УУBellSouth CommentФФs at 3Љ4; УУGTE CommentФФs at 1 and Exhibit 1; УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 2; УУUSTA CommentsФФ at 3.Šж The NIIF adopted the proposed wording of the intercept message in a general NIIF session with the support of other participating IXCs.жо|џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 2.ож The Commission expressly contemplated, in requiring УУФФthat LECs and IXCs work together to develop a CICs intercept message,жь}џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ьж that industry would use the processes of existing industry fora, such as the NIIF, cooperatively to develop an intercept message that satisfies the requirements of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ. MCI participated in the NIIF process and noted its objections before the NIIF.жѓ~џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ, Exhibit A at 2.ѓж Without a definite showing of anticompetitive effect, we decline to interfere in a process that, at a minimum, the Commission implicitly endorsed in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ.жШџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУUSTA CommentsФФ at 3Љ4 УУФФ(noting that it would be difficult for industry participants to commit to industry consensus processes if the Commission were to undermine the NIIF effort without a definitive showing of harm, not exhibited by MCI in the instant case).Шж As SBC states, "[t]o supersede the industry consensus because of the demands of one disgruntled party, would jeopardize this process and place a timely conversion at risk."жо€џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 3.ож ССи‚иССAlthough we support the industry consensus process and encourage parties to use the NIIFЉdeveloped intercept message, we disagree with VarTec that the Commission mandated the use of the NIIF intercept message, or any other specific intercept message, in its УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ and we will not require that any LEC that does not plan to employ the NIIF intercept message to obtain a waiver of that order.жшџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 3.шж VarTec correctly states, however, that the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ requires the intercept message to be provided in all of a LEC's exchanges.жщ‚џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4. щж To the extent a LEC cannot meet that requirement in any particular exchange, the LEC must obtain a waiver of the requirement.жйƒџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ 47 C.F.R. РР 1.3.йж ССи‚иССThus, while the precise language of the intercept message can vary, we interpret the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ to require the intercept message to, at a minimum: (1) explain that a dialing pattern change has occurred; (2) provide correct dialing instructions; and, (3) instruct the caller to contact its IXC for further information.жќ„џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУФФУУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ќж We conclude that an intercept message that does not meet these requirements may be an unreasonable practice under section 202(a) of the Act.жв…џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа 47 U.S.C. РР 202(a).вж Although we decline to interfere in the NIIF process, or to amend the NIIFЉdeveloped standard intercept message, we find that theУУФФ УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ does not require that the standard intercept message inform callers that their call cannot be completed as dialed. We conclude that this information should be optional and that an intercept message that does not include such information would not violate section 202(a) of the Act.жЯ†џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSeeФФ УУidФФ.Яж ССи‚иССWe recognize the concern of several parties that alternate messages might confuse customers and hinder customer education.ж&‡џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExcel CommentsФФ at 1Љ2; УУQCC CommentsФФ at 5; УУSprint CommentsФФ at 2; УУTRA CommentsФФ at 5.&ж The Commission did not, however, mandate the use of a specific intercept messageжьˆџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ьж and we conclude that any intercept message that contains the information noted above will reasonably notify callers of the dialing pattern change, regardless of the specific language that is employed. Importantly, we note that IXCs should not rely solely on an intercept message to educate their customers about changes necessitated by the transition to fourЉdigit CICs. Rather, IXCs are, in general, responsible for ensuring that their customers are informed and educated about the change in dialing patterns and are free to use whatever means of education they deem appropriate.жь‰џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ьж ССи‚иССWe reject VarTec's request that we order LECs to use the standard intercept message for at least six months.жоŠџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4.ож Again, we note that the Commission did not mandate the use of an intercept message for any particular period of time; instead, it left to the determination of the parties the period of time during which the message should be offered.жь‹џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ at para. 26.ьж We note that although there appears to be no clear standard for the duration of intercept messages, nothing in the record suggests that any LEC will offer the intercept message for less than six months. For example, BellSouth states that it intends to use the NIIF announcement indefinitelyжеŒџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Ben G. Almond, Vice President Љ Federal Regulatory, BellSouth, to Geraldine A. Matise, Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 21, 1998 (УУBellSouth April 21 Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 2.еж and GTE proposes to use the NIIF intercept message on a permanent basis.жŽџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from F. Gordon Maxson, DirectorЉRegulatory Affairs, GTE, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 20, 1998 (УУGTE April 20 Ex Parte LetterФФ).Žж Bell Atlantic states that it has no plans to discontinue the use of the special industryЉapproved announcement at any particular time.ж„ŽџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Marie Breslin, Bell Atlantic, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 23, 1998 (УУBell Atlantic April 23 Ex Parte LetterФФ).„ж After determining that it is appropriate to discontinue the special announcement, Bell Atlantic indicates that it would substitute a more general announcement informing customers that their call cannot be completed as dialed and that they should call their IXC for assistance.жїџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУФФУУBell Atlantic April 23 Ex Parte LetterФФ. УУФФїж Ameritech and U S West report that they will use the NIIF intercept message for a minimum of six months.жžџџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Celia Nogales, DirectorЉFederal Relations, Ameritech, to Renee Alexander, Network Services Division, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 21, 1998 (УУAmeritech April 21 Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 1; УУExФФ УУParteФФ Letter from Eldridge A. Stafford, Executive DirectorЉFederal Regulatory, U S WEST, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated April 22, 1998 (УУU S WEST April 22 Ex Parte LetterФФ) at 1. žж Thereafter, customers would be routed to a vacant code announcement that informs them that their call cannot be completed as dialed and that they should call their operator for assistance.ж&‘џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУAmeritech April 21 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 2; УУФФУУФФУУU S WEST April 22 Ex Parte LetterФФ at 1Љ2.&ж Based on the record, we strongly encourage parties to maintain an intercept message that complies with the requirements of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ for a minimum of six months and conclude that the offering of such an intercept message for less than six months may be an unreasonable practice under section 202(a) of the Act.жв’џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа 47 U.S.C. РР 202(a).вж ССи‚иССFinally, we conclude that MCI, VarTec, and those parties supporting their position, have not established that SITs are inherently anticompetitive or that they discourage callers from listening to the intercept message.жW“џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУMCI Ex Parte LetterФФ at 4Љ5; УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5Љ6УУФФ; УУTRA CommentsФФ at 4; УУQwest CommentsФФ at 5; УУExcel CommentsФФ at 4.Wж Several parties, including VarTec, note that the use of SITs in conjunction with various types of intercept messages is standard industry practice.жŠ”џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУU S WEST CommentsФФ at Attachment A; УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 4; УУGTE CommentsФФ at 2; УУAT&T CommentsФФ at 3Љ4; УУBell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 3; УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5; УУФФŠж As VarTec and the majority of commenting parties suggest, SITs are necessary because they allow automated detection devices to distinguish between a live voice and a recorded announcement.жE•џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУVarTec Ex Parte LetterФФ at 5; УУBell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 3; УУBellSouth CommentsФФ at 6; УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 4 .Eж Without an SIT, automated devices might interpret the threeЉdigit CIC call announcement as a completed call, which they would not do if a SIT were used.жџ–џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУBellSouth CommentsФФ at 6Љ7; УУBell Atlantic CommentsФФ at 3.џж For example, a "smart" payphone recognizes a SIT as a signal that the call did not complete and as an instruction to return coins to the caller.жХ—џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУIdФФ.Хж SBC also reports that carriers would be burdened by additional expenses and inconveniences if they had to make the network component alternations necessary to remove SITs from the intercept message.жо˜џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУSBC Companies CommentsФФ at 5; УУseeФФ УУalsoФФ УУGTE CommentsФФ at 2 (asserting that it would be premature to make a decision to remove SITs without an industry study to determine the impact of removing these tones from the various types of recording and announcement equipment).ож USTA concludes that the Commission should allow industry to employ SITs with the intercept message on an optional basis.жз™џџаавŒ 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)Œваа УУUSTA CommentsФФ at 4Љ5.зж ССи‚иССWithout any evidence of consumer adverse reaction to SITs, we decline to mandate that LECs remove SITs from the CICs intercept message. The record establishes that the use of SITs in conjunction with intercept messages is standard industry practice and that SITs permit automated detection devices to distinguish between a completed and an uncompleted call. For these reasons, we conclude that the decision as to whether SITs should be used in conjunction with the CICs intercept message is best left to determination by the parties based on their particular circumstances. We find that this approach is consistent with the approach adopted by the Commission in the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ, that the parties reach agreement on the exact content of the intercept message to be offered by LECs beginning on or before June 30, 1998.“ СрŒь#СУ УIV. CONCLUSIONФ Фƒ ССи‚иССThe decisions reached in this Order are intended to further the Commission's policy underlying numbering proceedings, of considering not only the needs of incumbents, but also those of new entrants in the telecommunications services market. In clarifying the intent of the УУCICs Order on ReconsiderationФФ that LECs may not begin to phaseЉout threeЉdigit CICs until July 1, 1998, we reiterate the Commission's goals in extending the permissive dialing period until June 30, 1998: to allow IXCs and other carriers additional time to educate customers about the dialing pattern change without unduly extending the dialing disparity between five and sevenЉdigit CACs or jeopardizing the availability of fourЉdigit CICs in the 5XXX and 6XXX range. We believe that the decisions we reach in this Order benefit the public interest by providing certainty as to the end of the permissive dialing period and by eliminating customer confusion that would result from a further extension of the transition from three to fourЉdigit CICs. Our decision to allow a phaseЉout of threeЉdigit CICs, over a two month period beginning July 1, 1998 and ending September 1, 1998, benefits LECs without adversely affecting the interests of IXCs or their customers. It also allows LECs to transition to complete blocking of threeЉdigit CICs in an orderly, efficient way that does not compromise the integrity of their networks or adversely affect the public interest. Finally, we find that the decisions we reach with respect to the offering of a standard intercept message are consistent with and promote the proЉcompetitive and deregulatory goals of the Communications Act, as amended. ХХСрLь СУ УV. ORDERING CLAUSESФ Фƒ ССи‚иССAccordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 1.2, and authority delegated in Section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.91, and Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.291, that the Request for ХХExpedited Declaratory Ruling of BellSouth Corporation IS GRANTED, as discussed herein. ХХССи‚иССIT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 1.3, and authority delegated in Section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.91, and Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.291, that a waiver IS GRANTED, to provide a phaseЉout period for threeЉdigit CICs, from July 1, 1998 until September 1, 1998, as discussed herein. ССи‚иССIT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 1.41, and authority delegated in Section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.91, and Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.291, that the Request for Commission Action filed by MCI IS DENIED, as discussed herein. ССи‚иССIT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 1.41, and authority delegated in Section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.91, and Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. РР 0.291, that the Request for Commission Action filed by VARTEC IS GRANTED IN PART, to the extent indicated herein, and, otherwise, DENIED, as discussed herein. ТТТ` ` ` ТТИ И И ТТТТhhhТFEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION ХХ ССССССССССLawrence E. Strickling ССССССССССDeputy Chief ССССССССССCommon Carrier Bureau оHHооHHо