ÿWPCÿ4 ûÿ2 ÿÿBPÿÿZ¦ÿÿ Courier 10cpi3|wÛZôxþ6X@É“8Ç;X@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿHP LaserJet IIISi 518 LPT318 LPT2)HPLASIII.PRSÛx Œ @ɇÏðHðÝQX@ÐÐûÿ2ÿÿ< ZL ¦n°3|wHP LaserJet IIISi 518 LPT318 LPT2)HPLASIII.PRSÛx Œ @ɇÏðHðÝQX@ÐÐBibliogrphy(¯Ct‡ÁBibliography(¿7$Á·GŒ RÂK+¿7P‡2À·Gf—+¿7bÂÂÁ€°° Á ûÿ2-øP»H”–—Doc InitxÂ(¯Ct‡Initialize Document StyleRÂK+¿7P‡2À·Gf—+¿7b’×  × ÒŒ I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentŒÒ²a1Document—+¿7b‡2Document StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7PFÙÙ Áàìì*ÁÃÃà Ã××Ø€Ø ÙÙÙÙ×׃ ÄÄÄ Äa2Document—+¿7b‡2Document StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P*  à ÃØØ ÃÃ×××× Ä ÄÄÄa3Document—+¿7b‡2Document StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P0  ÁÁà ÃØ‚Ø ×××× Ä Äûÿ2 q_fÐf6 qœa4Document—+¿7b‡2Document StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P  ÁÁà ÃÃÃ.ÄÄ Ä Äa5Document—+¿7b‡2ÁDocument StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P  a6Document—+¿7b‡2ÁDocument StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P  a7Document—+¿7b‡2ÁDocument StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P ÂÂÂ` ` `  ûÿ2æ q? è° ±˜ I a8Document—+¿7b‡2ÁDocument StyleÎ.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ !RÂK+¿7P ÂÂÂ` ` `  Tech InitxÂ(¯Ct‡Initialize Technical StyleRÂK+¿7P‡2À·Gf—+¿7b ÒŒ 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 þTechnicalŒÒa1Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P 4" ÃÃà Ã××Ø€Ø ÙÙÙÙ×× ÄÄÁÁ Ä Äa2Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P * à ÃØØ ÃÃ××××ÄÄ ÁÁ Ä Äûÿ2M – •® …C …È a3Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P' à ÃØ‚Ø ××××ÁÁ Ä Äa4Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P&à ÃØƒØ ××××ÁÁ Ä Äa5Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P& ÁÁà ÃØ„Ø . Ä Äa6Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P&!"ÁÁà ÃØ…Ø . Ä Äûÿ2F… … *‰ “³a7Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P&#$ÁÁà ÃØ†Ø . Ä Äa8Technical+¿7b‡2Technical Document Style.ÿ+BÂ(¿7$Á·GŒ #RÂK+¿7P&%&ÁÁà ÃØ‡Ø . Ä ÄPleadingxÂ(¯Ct‡Header for numbered pleading paper7P‡2À·Gf—+¿7bÒ'(ÐÈÐÐ °° è ÐÕ²ˆ,Ñ#6X@@#ÑÐÈÐÐ °°X° ÐÐÐÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ °ÿÿÐÐÚyø*ü°dddyÚÚyø*°dddyÚ ÁHHÀÁ1ƒ ÁHHÀÁ2ƒ ÁHHÀÁ3ƒ ÁHHÀÁ4ƒ ÁHHÀÁ5ƒ ÁHHÀÁ6ƒ ÁHHÀÁ7ƒ ÁHHÀÁ8ƒ ÁHHÀÁ9ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ10ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ11ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ12ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ13ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ14ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ15ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ16ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ17ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ18ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ19ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ20ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ21ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ22ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ23ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ24ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ25ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ26ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ27ƒ ÁHÐÀÁ28Ó   Ó²Õa1Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7P8)*Á@ÁØØ ƒÁ€°° Á ûÿ2œx¥®¹·ga2Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7PA+,ÁÁÁ@` ` ÁØØ ƒÁ€ÁÂ` ` `  a3Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7PJ-.ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ@¸ ¸ ÁØØ ƒÁ€` ` Á¸ ¸ ¸  a4Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7PS/0ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁ@ÁØØ ƒÁ€¸ ¸ Á a5Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7P\12ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁÁÁ@hh#ÁØØ ƒÁ€ÁÂhhh ûÿ2ÀPÉÒÙe«a6Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7Pe34ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁÁÁhh#ÁÁ@ÀÀ(ÁØØ ƒÁ€hh#ÁÂÀÀÀ a7Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7Pn56ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁÁÁhh#ÁÁÀÀ(ÁÁ@-ÁØØ ƒÁ€ÀÀ(Á a8Right Par+¿7b‡2ÁRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersÿ+HÂ(¿7gRÂK+¿7Pw78ÁÁÁ` ` ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÁÁÁÁhh#ÁÁÀÀ(ÁÁ-ÁÁ@pp2ÁØØ ƒÁ€-ÁÂppp Heading 2Underlined Heading Flush Left1û4“ÃÃÃà ÄÄÄÄûÿ2«"€B‰Â°K°ûHeading 1Centered Headingcal Style¿ 4GÔ Y ÔÁàìì*ÁÃÃà à ÄÄÄ ÄBullet ListÁIndented Bullet List*¿Mˆ0Ô Y ÔÂXÂÀÀÂX` ` ÂÆ(#` Æ "‚ShÁ5ãªÿÿÿÿ®ÿÿÿÿÿÿ^;C]dd²œCCCd²CCCCddddddddddCCȲÈY²~‰”~v”CN~µ”s…k~”½‚CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8œddddJN8ddddYYdYÈÏddddddCddddddddd8YYYYY²…‰Y~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8”ddddd”d”d”d”ddY”dddd”dsdddd‰d‰d‰d”d~d~d~d~dddddd”d”dd8dddd’oddd~d~d€<|8t”d”ddd²…d…dlLkdkd~d~d~d”d”d”d”d½d€XCddCCCWÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQdd°ddd²²dFdddd²FCChhd²44ÈÈddzz˜ÈdÈddv§§oo²Chd½ñF"ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈdÈÈh²²ÈÈÈdå²²ÈÈȲdCCÈÈÈÈÈzȲxCÈddod²ÈÈ…dCdYdsœ‚ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ]ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈȧ…zœÈÈÈÈUvÈÈÈÈÈÈÅdÈÈÈÈYYCCCCÅz~ozo…Y~N‚Y”dYC8Y…oµo”Y…dYzsdzdd~YY…zoœzzz~”CdzYzzzzCCdddd”dddzCsdYCÈ"‚ShÁ5ãªÿÿÿÿ®ÿÿÿÿÿÿ^;C]dd²¤CCCd²CCCCddddddddddCCȲÈd²……xœœN`œ…½œxœo…È…CCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8¤odooYNCodddYdddÈÏddddddCddddddddo8dddddÏY…Y…Y…Y…YN8N8N8N8oœdœdœdœdooooddoœdœdddxoddddddo…d…d…d…dœdœdœdœdœdœoœod8doddµrddœo…d…d…N…8Ÿooœdœdâ”ddoNodod…d…d…dooooÈd…YCddCCCWÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddÃddd²²dFdddd²FCCssd²44ÈÈddzz˜ÈdÈdd~§§oo²Csd½éF"ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈdÈÈs²²ÈÈÈdå²²ÈÈȲdCCÈÈÈÈÈzȲxCÈddod²ÈÈ…dCdYdsœ‰ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ`ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ®…zœÈÈÈÈUvÈÈÈÈÈÈÅdÈÈÈÈddCCCCÅz…ozo…Y…N…YœYYN8œY…o½oY…dœYzzdzdd…YY…zoœzzz…œNdœzYzzzzCCddddœdddzCzdYCÈûÿ2o1°Ý"‚'°(°¿,"‚ShÁ5ãªÿÿÿÿ®ÿÿÿÿÿÿ^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx<åkkxxxk<((xxxxxWIxkWWWWWWWWWWx(xV"G($,#›°hGϾ¦ P쉊7ûhPþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÐÿÿ‰?xxx,PÉAôxô6NßhÉŠ Ç;XHþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ&@’6uC;,g/3Xu‚&_â xì$&7ûXXþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ&ÿÿX F($,goêhF‚&_â xì$&7ûhXþþþþþþþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÔ ‰?´<ÔÐ ÈÈ ÐÐÐà ÃÁà”ì'ÁBefore theÄ Äƒ Ô ‰?È´<Ôà ÃÁà0 ì¿ÁFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONÄ Äƒ Ô ‰?´<Ôà ÃÁà,ì ÁWashington, D.C.Ä Äƒ ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁÁÀÀ@ÁÁhÁÁppÁDA 97©1646 Ô YèÃ-ÔÑ#XwϾ¦ PìE37û[hXP#ÑIn the Matter ofÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á) ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á) Ô YºÃ-ÔPolicies and Rules ConcerningÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á)ÁhÁ Ô Y£Ã-ÔOperator Service Access andÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á) Ô YŒÃ-ÔPay Telephone CompensationÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á)ÁhÁCC Docket No. 91©35 ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á) Ô Y^ Ã-ÔPetitions Pertaining to OriginatingÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á)ÁhÁCCB/CPD File No. 96©18 Ô YG Ã-ÔLine Screening ServicesÁðÁÁhhÁÁÀÀ@Á) Ô ‘X Ã-Ôà ÃÁà} ìÊÁMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERÄ Äƒ ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁAdopted: July 31, 1997; Released: July 31, 1997 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau: Ô ‘X¦Ã-ÔÙÙÐÐÔTìÔà à Ô ‘XÃ-ÔÔcÔI. INTRODUCTIONÄ ÄÔTìÔÐÐÔP°Ô Ô YaÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ1.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁà ÃÄ ÄIn this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we grant requests by various local exchange carriers (LECs) to extend the deadline for filing federal tariffs offering Ô Y3Ò-Ôenhanced originating line screening service (OLS) under applicable Commission Orders.Öê 3'9Ô ‰C¬Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁÃÃSee ÄÄPolicies and Rules Concerning Operator Services and Pay Telephone Compensation, CC Docket No. 91©35, Third Report and Ô ‰?@Ã<ÔOrder, FCC No. 96©131 (rel. April 5, 1996)(ÃÃEnhanced OLS Service Ô ‰?Ã<ÔOrder)ÄÄ; ÃÃÄÄPetitions Pertaining to Originating Line Screening Services, CCB/CPD File Nos. 96©18 and 96©25, Order DA No. 96©2000 Ô ‰?˜Ã<Ô(rel. Nov. 29, 1996)(ÃÃNovember OrderÄÄ); and Memorandum Opinion and Order, CCB/CPD File Nos. 96©18, 96©25, and CCB/CPD File No. 96ªÔ ‰?(Ã<Ô32,DA No. 96©2169 (rel. Dec. 20, 1996)(ÃÃDecember OrderÄÄ). For a Ô ‰?ðÃ<Ôdescription of OLS Service, see ÃÃDecember Order ÄÄat p. 1 n.1. êÖ Specifically, we grant the Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) and eight members of the National Exchange Carrier Association extensions to December 1, 1997. We also grant extensions to October 1, 1997, to 78 carriers identified by Illuminet, Inc. (Illuminet). ÁxÁÁ` `  Á Ô ‘X’Ã-ÔÐÐÔÄ Ôà ÃII. WAIVER REQUESTS AND COMMENTSÄ ÄÔTìÔÐÐÔP°Ô Ô YdÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ2.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁOn July 14, 1997, SNET filed a petition for expedited waiver of the Ô ’YMÃ-Ôrequirement established in the ÃÃDecember OrderÄÄ that SNET and other LECs file federal tariffsÔ"Mœ0*0*0*°°ïð"Ô Ô YÒ-Ôoffering OLS service on or before August 1, 1997.Ö…´†Ô ‰CyÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁÃÃSee ÄÄSNET Petitions for Expedited Waiver of OLNS Service, CC Docket No. 91©35, CCB/CPD File No. 96©18, Public Notice, DA 97©1560 (rel. July 23, 1997). In response to this notice of the SNET Petition, NECA filed comments on July 28, 1997, and the New England Public Communications Council, Inc., filed reply comments on July 30, 1997.…Ö In its petition, SNET asserts that it will not be able to make OLS service available under its federal tariff until March 31, 1998, because it devoted extensive resources earlier this year to other major proceedings such as the Commission's payphone proceeding and because of other activities including modification of SNET's network and related systems to enable new carriers to compete with AT&T for coin traffic, expansion of Feature Group D Carrier Identification Codes, as well as other Ô YvÒ-Ôprojects arising from state resale and unbundling mandates.ÖDÌvD†Ô ‰Ck Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁSNET Petition at 3.DÖ Also, SNET asserts that necessary software modifications to its DBAS II system will not be completed until midªSeptember 1997, and that necessary changes to its service order processing system cannot be accomplished until late in 1997. SNET states that a deferral until March 1998 would enable it to devote its limited personnel resources to implementation of the extensive structure and pricing changes ordered in the Commission's access reform proceeding which changes SNET Ô Yì Ò-Ôstates must be completed by year end.ÖHÌì Ø†Ô ‰CuÒ<Ô Á` `  ÁSNET Petition at 1©2. HÖ SNET contends no harm would result from its requested extension because SNET has received only limited customer interest in OLS service and no bona fide requests for such service. Ô YÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ3.Ø In its comments on SNET's petition, NECA contends that SNET has Ô YyÒ-Ôdemonstrated sufficient grounds for waiver of its August 1 OLS service deadline.ÖEÌyl †Ô ‰C–Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁNECA Comments at 3. EÖ NECA also states that eight of its member companies obtain LIDB services from SNET and that, as a result, their ability to implement LIDB©based OLS services by August 1, 1997, will be adversely impacted by SNET's prospective inability to make OLS service available through Ô YÒ-ÔLIDB by that date.ÖGÌ †Ô ‰CÎÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁNECA Comments at 2©3. GÖ NECA asks the Commission to include them in any extensions of the Ô YÒ-ÔOLS service requirement that SNET might be granted.ÖEÌ” †Ô ‰CK"Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁNECA Comments at 3. EÖ ÁxÁÁ` `  Á Ô YØÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ4.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁNEPCC, a trade association representing independent payphone providers, opposes SNET's petition. NEPCC asserts that the availability of OLS service from SNET and other LECs is important to the ability of other carriers to identify calls from privately owned payphones and from other categories of aggregator locations and that OLS service is important to tracking calls for the purpose of compensating payphone providers forÔ"|(0* ( (°°šð"Ô Ô ’YÒ-Ôhandling dial©around calls, ÃÃi.e.,ÄÄ payphone calls that do not involve the presubscribed carrier.ÖKÌ†Ô ‰CyÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁNEPCC Reply Comments at 2.KÖ For these reasons, NEPCC declares that there may be a need for SNET to provide OLS Ô YÔÒ-Ôservice before the expiration of SNET's requested extension period.ÖK ÌÔ\†Ô ‰CáÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁNEPCC Reply Comments at 2.KÖ NEPCC also states that any SNET payphone subsidy or other affiliate should not have access to OLS service while such service is being denied to independent payphone providers in Connecticut. NEPCC urges that any waiver be conditioned on SNET's denial of OLS service or equivalent central office©based services to any payphone operated by SNET or any subsidiary or affiliate of Ô YaÒ-ÔSNET until such time as that service is fully available to independent payphone providers.ÖM Ìað†Ô ‰C Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁNEPCC Reply Comments at 2©3.MÖ Also, in the event SNET secures a waiver, NEPCC asked that any such waiver be granted only though the effective date of per call compensation under applicable Commission Ô Y Ò-Ôorders.Öq ” „†Ô ‰CQÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁThe effective date for per call compensation is October 7, 1997.qÖ Ô Yî Ã-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ5.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁOn behalf of 78 companies that use Illuminet as their LIDB provider and that have elected to offer LIDB©based OLS service through LIDB, Illuminet seeks an Ô YÀ Ò-Ôextension until October 1, 1997, to provide OLS service.ÖD ìÀ à†Ô ‰CQÒ<ÔÁ` `  ÁLetter from Stephen G. Kraskin, Attorney for Illuminet, Inc., to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, July 29, 1997 (Illuminet Letter). The Appendix lists the 78 companies for which Illuminet seeks waiver of their August 1, 1997, deadlines. DÖ Illuminet contends that it adopted an expedited program to develop and implement LIDB©based OLS service and that it was diligently working toward implementation of that service on or before August 1, 1997. It states that during the week of July 21, 1997, it encountered problems in loading of the data to be utilized by its LIDB system for provision of OLS service. Illuminet claims that the existence of these problems could not have been identified prior to the transition to "on©line" testing during that week and that, absent further software modifications, its LIDB©based OLS service cannot be implemented by August 1, 1997, with assurance that it will provide appropriate information to OLS subscribers or that it will not disrupt other ongoing LIDBªÔ YñÒ-Ôbased network services.ÖI Ìñ” †Ô ‰C6#Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁIlluminet Letter at 1©2.IÖ Neither carriers nor their customers would be harmed by such an extension because, according to Illuminet, it has not received any requests for access to OLS Ô YÃÒ-Ôdata.ÖHÌÃ(†Ô ‰Cœ&Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁIlluminet Letter at 2. HÖ Ô"¬¼0* ( (°°Éð"ÔŒÔ ‘XÃ-ÔÐÐÔÔà ÃIII. DISCUSSIONÄ Ä ÔTìÔÐÐÔP°Ô Ô YÒÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ6.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁWe conclude that good cause has been shown by requesting parties for an extension of the August 1, 1997, filing date that will permit them to address the technical issues raised in their petitions. Given that the necessary modifications to SNET's DBAS II system may be completed as early as mid©September 1997, we conclude that an extension to and through December 1, 1997, will afford it a reasonable opportunity to address these issues while not unduly delaying the provision of OLS service. SNET's generalized allegations of personnel difficulties and its statement of other responsibilities do not persuade us that a longer extension is warranted. In light of their reliance on SNET for LIDB©OLS, we grant Ô Y Ò-Ôa similar extension to the eight LECs listed in NECA's comments on SNET's Petition.ÖKÌ †Ô ‰C“ Ò<ÔÁ` `  ÁNECA Comments at 3 n. 13. KÖ ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁ Ô Yì Ã-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ7.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁWe also conclude that the requested extension to October 1, 1997, is justified for the 78 companies identified by Illuminet. As Illuminet explains, each of these LECs earlier determined not to employ FlexANI to make OLS service available and each has, instead, requested that Illuminet provide such services through LIDB. The requested extension will permit Illuminet to address the technical issues it raises without unduly delaying the provision of OLS service by these companies. ÁxÁÁ` `  Á Ô YKÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ8.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁ We remind SNET and other LECs that they remain subject to the Ô ’Y4Ã-ÔCommission's requirements in the ÃÃPayphone Order ÄÄand the ÃÃPayphone Reconsideration OrderÄÄ and, accordingly, may not discriminate in the provision of OLS or other services in favor of any payphone subsidiary or otherwise affiliated payphone company. Also, the extensions granted today do not alter or otherwise modify any obligations of these or other LECs under Ô ’YÚÃ-Ôthe Commission's ÃÃPayphone Order ÄÄand the ÃÃPayphone Reconsideration OrderÄÄ. ÁxÁÁ` `  Á Ô Y®Ã-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ9.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁAccordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition for Expedited Waiver filed by the Southern New England Telephone Company on July 14, 1997 in this proceeding IS GRANTED to the extent discussed above and is otherwise DENIED. Ô YRÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ 10.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the July 28, 1997, request of the National Exchange Carrier Association, on behalf of eight of its member companies, for waiver of the August 1, 1997, deadline to offer enhanced originating line screening service under federal tariff IS GRANTED. Ô"ö\0* ( (°°ïð"Ô Ô YÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁØ 11.Ø Á¸ ¸ ÈÁIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the July 29, 1997, request of Illuminet, Inc., on behalf of 78 companies, for waiver of the August 1, 1997, deadline to offer enhanced originating line screening service under federal tariff IS GRANTED. ÁxÁÁ` `  Á ÁxÁÁ` `  Á ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ÁxÁ ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁJames D. Schlichting ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁChief, Competitive Pricing Division, ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁCommon Carrier Bureau Ô ð ÔÐÐÔ"ì 0* ( (°°@ ð"Ô Ô ‘XÃ-ÔÐ °°Xà ÐÐ °°°° ÐÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁà ÃÁàëì.ÁAPPENDIXÄ Äƒ Ô YÒÃ-ÔA.ÁxÁLECs Requesting LIDB©based OLS Service From Illuminet ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company, of Maryland ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company, of New York ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company, of Pennsylvania ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company, of West Virginia ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company, of Northern Division ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmstrong Telephone Company North ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArlington Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁArmour Independent Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁBear Lake Communications, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁBig Sandy Telecom, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁBlair Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁBridgewater©Canistota Independent Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁBuggs Island Telephone Cooperative ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCambridge Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCameron Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCassadaga Telephone Corporation ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCentral Utah Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁThe Chillicothe Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁClifton Forge©Waynesboro Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁColumbus Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCommunity Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCoon Creek Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁCooperative Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁDell Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁDunbarton Telephone, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁDunkirk and Fredonia Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁEagleNet, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁEastern Nebraska Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁElizabeth Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁEvans Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁFarmers Mutual Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁFarmers Telephone, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁFlorala Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGanado Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGeneseo Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGridley Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGriswold Cooperative Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGreen Hills Telephone Corporation ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGulf Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁHamilton Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁHenry County Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁThe Home Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁIronton Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁKennebec Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁKnology Holdings, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁLa Ward Telephone Exchange, Inc.Ô"™,X/È-È-XXð-ð"ÔŒÁxÁÁ` `  ÁLackawaxen Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁLennon Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁLivingston Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁMatanuska Telephone Association, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁMid©Plains Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁMonroe Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁMuenster Telephone Corporation of TX ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁNew Paris Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁNortheast Florida Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁNortheast Louisiana Telephone Company, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁOgden Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁOran Mutual Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁOregon Telephone Corporation ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁThe Ottoville Mutual Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁPanhandle Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁPembroke Telephone Company, Inc, ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁPulaski©White Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁReadlyn Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁRichmond Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁRock County Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁSanborn Telephone Cooperative ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁSherwood Mutual Telephone Association, Inc. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁSkyline Telecom ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁSt. Joseph Telephone & Telegraph Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁThe Sycarnore Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁTaconic Telephone Corp. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁUnion River Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁUnion Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁWabash Mutual Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁWaldron Telephone Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁWilkes Telephone & Electric Company ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁWinnebago Cooperative Telephone Association ÁxÁÁ` `  Á ÁxÁÁ` `  Á Ô YòÃ-ÔÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ€xÁÁ€°°PÁB.ÁxÁLECs Listed by NECA as Relying on SNET for LIDB©based OLS Service ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁChina Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁStandish Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁGranite State Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁWoodbury Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁFishers Island Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁSidney Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁMaine Telephone Co. ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁPioneer Telephone Association, Inc.