NOTICE ************************************************************************* NOTICE ************************************************************************* This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect. If the original document contained-- * Footnotes * Boldface & Italics --this information is missing in this version The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too. If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version. For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file pnmc5021. File pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous. ************************************************************************* DA 96-1124 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Telephone Number Portability ) CC Docket No. 95-116 ) RM 8535 ) ERRATUM Released: July 15, 1996 1. On June 27, 1996, the Commission adopted the First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Order) in the above-captioned proceeding, CC Docket No. 95-116, FCC 96-286, released July 2, 1996. This erratum amends footnotes 449 and 459 of the Order by replacing "Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, First Report and Order, CC Docket 94-54, FCC 96-263 (adopted June 12, 1996)" with "Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, First Report and Order, CC Docket 94-54, FCC 96-263 (rel. July 12, 1996)." 2. This erratum also amends Appendix B by adding " 52.1(c) The term covered SMR means either 800 MHz and 900 MHz SMR licensees that hold geographic area licenses or incumbent wide area SMR licensees that offer real-time, two-way switched voice service that is interconnected with the public switched network, either on a stand-alone basis or packaged with other telecommunications services. This term does not include local SMR licensees offering mainly dispatch services to specialized customers in a non-cellular system configuration, licensees offering only data, one-way, or stored voice services on an interconnected basis, or any SMR provider that is not interconnected to the public switched network." 3. This erratum also amends Appendix B by adding " 52.1(g) The term incumbent wide area SMR licensee has the same meaning as that term is defined in Section 20.3 of this chapter." 4. This erratum also amends Appendix B by redesignating existing " 52.1(c)" as " 52.1(d)," existing " 52.1(d)" as " 52.1(e)," existing " 52.1(e)" as " 52.1(f)," existing " 52.1(f)" as " 52.1(h)," existing " 52.1(g)" as " 52.1(i)," existing " 52.1(h)" as " 52.1(j)," existing " 52.1(i)" as " 52.1(k)," existing " 52.1(j)" as " 52.1(l)," existing " 52.1(k)" as " 52.1(m)," existing " 52.1(l)" as " 52.1(n)," existing " 52.1(m)" as " 52.1(o)," existing " 52.1(n)" as " 52.1(p)," existing " 52.1(o)" as " 52.1(q)," existing " 52.1(p)" as " 52.1(r)," existing " 52.1(q)" as " 52.1(s)," existing " 52.1(r)" as " 52.1(t)," existing " 52.1(s)" as " 52.1(u)," and existing " 52.1(t)" as " 52.1(v)." 5. This erratum also amends Appendix B, final rule  52.11(b), by deleting "(as defined in Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, First Report and Order, CC Docket No. 94-54, FCC 96-263 (adopted June 12, 1996))." 6. This erratum also amends Appendix B of the Order by replacing "Appendix A to Part 52" in final rule  52.3(b), (e), (f) with "the Appendix to Part 52." This erratum also replaces "Appendix A to Part 52" with "Appendix to Part 52." 7. This erratum also amends the Appendix to Part 52, as set forth in Appendix B of the Order, and Appendix F of the Order. The Appendix to Part 52 and Appendix F currently state that implementation of number portability must be completed by the carriers in "Akron, OH," the 20th largest Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), during 1/98-3/98, and in "Cleveland, OH," the 73rd largest MSA, during 7/98-9/98. This erratum amends the Appendix to Part 52 and Appendix F to state that implementation of number portability must be completed by the carriers in "Cleveland, OH," the 20th largest MSA, during 1/98-3/98, and in "Akron, OH," the 73rd largest MSA, during 7/98-9/98. 8. In addition, the Appendix to Part 52 and Appendix F currently state that implementation of number portability must be completed by the carriers in "Birmingham, AL," the 66th largest MSA, during 7/98-9/98, and in "Greenville, SC," the 67th largest MSA, during 10/98-12/98. This erratum amends the Appendix to Part 52 and Appendix F to state that implementation of number portability must be completed by the carriers in "Greenville, SC," the 66th largest MSA, during 7/98-9/98, and in "Birmingham, AL," the 67th largest MSA, during 10/98-12/98. 9. Also, Appendix D of the Order currently states that "Akron, OH" is the 20th largest MSA, and that "Cleveland, OH" is the 73rd largest MSA. This erratum amends Appendix D to state that "Cleveland, OH" is the 20th largest MSA, and that "Akron, OH" is the 73rd largest MSA. Appendix D of the Order currently states that "Birmingham, AL" is the 66th largest MSA with a population of "872,000," and that "Greenville, SC" is the 67th largest MSA with a population of "837,000." This erratum amends Appendix D to state that "Greenville, SC" is the 66th largest MSA with a population of "873,000," and that "Birmingham, AL" is the 67th largest MSA with a population of "872,000." FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard K. Welch Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX to Part 52 -- Deployment Schedule for Long-Term Database Methods for Local Number Portability Implementation must be completed by the carriers in the relevant MSAs during the periods specified below: 10/97-12/97 1/98-3/98 4/98-6/98 Chicago, IL 3 Detroit, MI 6 Cleveland, OH 20 Indianapolis, IN 34 Milwaukee, WI 35 Columbus, OH 38 Philadelphia, PA 4 Washington, DC 5 Baltimore, MD 18 Pittsburgh, PA 19 Newark, NJ 25 Norfolk, VA 32 Atlanta, GA 8 Miami, FL 24 Fort Lauderdale, FL 39 Orlando, FL 40 New Orleans, LA 41 Charlotte, NC 43 Greensboro, NC 48 Nashville, TN 51 Las Vegas, NV50 Cincinnati, OH 30 Tampa, FL 23 New York, NY 2 Boston, MA 9 Nassau, NY 13 Buffalo, NY 44 Los Angeles, CA 1 Riverside, CA 10 San Diego, CA 14 Orange Co, CA 15 Oakland, CA 21 San Francisco, CA 29 Rochester, NY49 Houston, TX 7 Dallas, TX 11 St. Louis, MO 16 Kansas City, KS 28 Fort Worth, TX 33 Hartford, CT 46 Minneapolis, MN 12 Phoenix, AZ 17 Seattle, WA 22 Denver, CO 26 Portland, OR 27 7/98-9/98 10/98-12/98 Grand Rapids, MI 56 Dayton, OH 61 Akron, OH 73 Gary, IN 80 Toledo, OH 81 Youngstown, OH 85 Ann Arbor, MI 95 Fort Wayne, IN 100 Bergen, NJ 42 Middlesex, NJ 52 Monmouth, NJ 54 Richmond, VA 63 Scranton, PA 78 Allentown, PA 82 Harrisburg, PA 83 Jersey City, NJ 88 Wilmington, DE 89 Memphis, TN 53 Louisville, KY 57 Jacksonville, FL 58 Raleigh, NC 59 West Palm Beach, FL 62 Greenville, SC 66 Birmingham, AL 67 Knoxville, KY 79 Baton Rouge, LA 87 Charleston, SC 92 Sarasota, FL 93 Mobile, AL 96 Columbia, SC 98 Honolulu, HI 65 Tulsa, OK 70 Providence, RI 47 Albany, NY 64 Syracuse, NY 69 Springfield, MA 86 San Jose, CA 31 Sacramento, CA 36 Fresno, CA 68 Ventura, CA 72 Bakersfield, CA 84 Stockton, CA 94 Vallejo, CA 99 San Antonio, TX 37 Oklahoma City, OK 55 Austin, TX 60 El Paso, TX 74 Little Rock, AR 90 Wichita, KS 97 New Haven, CT 91 Salt Lake City, UT 45 Tucson, AZ 71 Omaha, NE 75 Albuquerque, NM 76 Tacoma, WA 77 APPENDIX D - 100 LARGEST METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAs) AND THEIR POPULATIONS 1. Los Angeles, CA 9,150,000 2. New York, NY 8,584,000 3. Chicago, IL 7,668,000 4. Philadelphia, PA 4,949,000 5. Washington, DC 4,474,000 6. Detroit, MI 4,307,000 7. Houston, TX 3,653,000 8. Atlanta, GA 3,331,000 9. Boston, MA* 3,211,000 10. Riverside, CA 2,907,000 11. Dallas, TX 2,898,000 12. Minneapolis, MN 2,688,000 13. Nassau, NY 2,651,000 14. San Diego, CA 2,621,000 15. Orange Co., CA 2,543,000 16. St. Louis, MO 2,536,000 17. Phoenix, AZ 2,473,000 18. Baltimore, MD 2,458,000 19. Pittsburgh, PA 2,402,000 20. Cleveland, OH 2,222,000 21. Oakland, CA 2,182,000 22. Seattle, WA 2,180,000 23. Tampa, FL 2,157,000 24. Miami, FL 2,025,000 25. Newark, NJ 1,934,000 26. Denver, CO 1,796,000 27. Portland, OR 1,676,000 28. Kansas City, KS 1,647,000 29. San Francisco, CA 1,646,000 30. Cincinnati, OH 1,581,000 31. San Jose, CA 1,557,000 32. Norfolk, VA 1,529,000 33. Fort Worth, TX 1,464,000 34. Indianapolis, IN 1,462,000 35. Milwaukee, WI 1,456,000 36. Sacramento, CA 1,441,000 37. San Antonio, TX 1,437,000 38. Columbus, OH 1,423,000 39. Fort Lauderdale, FL 1,383,000 40. Orlando, FL 1,361,000 41. New Orleans, LA 1,309,000 42. Bergen, NJ 1,304,000 43. Charlotte, NC 1,260,000 44. Buffalo, NY 1,189,000 45. Salt Lake City, UT 1,178,000 46. Hartford, CT* 1,156,000 47. Providence, RI* 1,131,000 48. Greensboro, NC 1,107,000 49. Rochester, NY 1,090,000 50. Las Vegas, NV 1,076,000 51. Nashville, TN 1,070,000 52. Middlesex, NJ 1,069,000 53. Memphis, TN 1,056,000 54. Monmouth, NJ 1,035,000 55. Oklahoma City, OK 1,007,000 56. Grand Rapids, MI 985,000 57. Louisville, KY 981,000 58. Jacksonville, FL 972,000 59. Raleigh, NC 965,000 60. Austin, TX 964,000 61. Dayton, OH 956,000 62. West Palm Beach, FL 955,000 63. Richmond, VA 917,000 64. Albany, NY 875,000 65. Honolulu, HI 874,000 66. Greenville, SC 873,000 67. Birmingham, AL 872,000 68. Fresno, CA 835,000 69. Syracuse, NY 754,000 70. Tulsa, OK 743,000 71. Tucson, AZ 732,000 72. Ventura, CA 703,000 73. Akron, OH 677,000 74. El Paso, TX 665,000 75. Omaha, NE 663,000 76. Albuquerque, NM 646,000 77. Tacoma, WA 638,000 78. Scranton, PA 637,000 79. Knoxville, TN 631,000 80. Gary, IN 620,000 81. Toledo, OH 614,000 82. Allentown, PA 612,000 83. Harrisburg, PA 610,000 84. Bakersfield, CA 609,000 85. Youngstown, OH 604,000 86. Springfield, MA* 584,000 87. Baton Rouge, LA 558,000 88. Jersey City, NJ 552,000 89. Wilmington, DE 539,000 90. Little Rock, AR 538,000 91. New Haven, CT* 527,000 92. Charleston, SC 522,000 93. Sarasota, FL 518,000 94. Stockton, CA 518,000 95. Ann Arbor, MI 515,000 96. Mobile, AL 512,000 97. Wichita, KS 507,000 98. Columbia, SC 486,000 99. Vallejo, CA 483,000 100. Fort Wayne, IN 469,000 * Population figures for New England's city and town based MSAs are for 1992, while others are for 1994. APPENDIX F - IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Implementation must be completed by the carriers in the relevant MSAs during the periods specified below: 10/97-12/97 1/98-3/98 4/98-6/98 Chicago, IL 3 Detroit, MI 6 Cleveland, OH 20 Indianapolis, IN 34 Milwaukee, WI 35 Columbus, OH 38 Philadelphia, PA 4 Washington, DC 5 Baltimore, MD 18 Pittsburgh, PA 19 Newark, NJ 25 Norfolk, VA 32 Atlanta, GA 8 Miami, FL 24 Fort Lauderdale, FL 39 Orlando, FL 40 New Orleans, LA 41 Charlotte, NC 43 Greensboro, NC 48 Nashville, TN 51 Las Vegas, NV50 Cincinnati, OH 30 Tampa, FL 23 New York, NY 2 Boston, MA 9 Nassau, NY 13 Buffalo, NY 44 Los Angeles, CA 1 Riverside, CA 10 San Diego, CA 14 Orange Co, CA 15 Oakland, CA 21 San Francisco, CA 29 Rochester, NY49 Houston, TX 7 Dallas, TX 11 St. Louis, MO 16 Kansas City, KS 28 Fort Worth, TX 33 Hartford, CT 46 Minneapolis, MN 12 Phoenix, AZ 17 Seattle, WA 22 Denver, CO 26 Portland, OR 27 7/98-9/98 10/98-12/98 Grand Rapids, MI 56 Dayton, OH 61 Akron, OH 73 Gary, IN 80 Toledo, OH 81 Youngstown, OH 85 Ann Arbor, MI 95 Fort Wayne, IN 100 Bergen, NJ 42 Middlesex, NJ 52 Monmouth, NJ 54 Richmond, VA 63 Scranton, PA 78 Allentown, PA 82 Harrisburg, PA 83 Jersey City, NJ 88 Wilmington, DE 89 Memphis, TN 53 Louisville, KY 57 Jacksonville, FL 58 Raleigh, NC 59 West Palm Beach, FL 62 Greenville, SC 66 Birmingham, AL 67 Knoxville, KY 79 Baton Rouge, LA 87 Charleston, SC 92 Sarasota, FL 93 Mobile, AL 96 Columbia, SC 98 Honolulu, HI 65 Tulsa, OK 70 Providence, RI 47 Albany, NY 64 Syracuse, NY 69 Springfield, MA 86 San Jose, CA 31 Sacramento, CA 36 Fresno, CA 68 Ventura, CA 72 Bakersfield, CA 84 Stockton, CA 94 Vallejo, CA 99 San Antonio, TX 37 Oklahoma City, OK 55 Austin, TX 60 El Paso, TX 74 Little Rock, AR 90 Wichita, KS 97 New Haven, CT 91 Salt Lake City, UT 45 Tucson, AZ 71 Omaha, NE 75 Albuquerque, NM 76 Tacoma, WA 77