$// Order; SW Bell; Trans. No. 2316; Dismiss Application for Review; FCC 95-414 //$ $/ Section 203(a) - Communications Act /$ TRANSMITTED FOR FCC RECORD ONLY FCC 95-414 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ) Transmittal No. 2316 Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 ) ORDER Adopted: October 2, 1995 Released: October 4, 1995 By the Commission: 1. On April 15, 1994, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) rejected the above- captioned revisions to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) Tariff F.C.C. No 73, on the grounds that the proposed tariff language was unclear and ambiguous in violation of Sections 61.2 and 61.54(j) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  61.2 and 61.54(j). Those tariff revisions would have introduced maximum and minimum rates -- "rate ranges" -- in SWB's access tariff. 2. On May 13, 1994, SWB filed an application for review of the Bureau's rejection Order. MCI Telecommunications Corporation (MCI) filed its opposition to the application for review on May 31, 1994, to which SWB replied on June 15, 1994. 3. SWB argues that the Bureau accepted filings from a number of nondominant common carriers presenting ranges of rates for access elements similar to the ones contained in SWB's rejected transmittal. It also observes that subsequent to the Teleport Order, the Commission released the Rate Range Order formally amending our rules to allow nondominant carriers to utilize reasonable ranges of rates. SWB argues that the Bureau's rejection of its transmittal was inconsistent with these actions, and was therefore arbitrary and capricious. 4. On January 20, 1995, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the Commission's Rate Range Order. In Southwestern Bell Corporation v. FCC, 43 F.3d 1515, 1526 (D.C. Cir. 1995)(Southwestern Bell), the court held that Section 203(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.  203(a), does not permit the Commission to allow common carriers to file a range of charges. 5. In view of the court's decision in Southwestern Bell, SWB's application for review is moot. That decision applies to all common carriers, not just nondominant carriers. It also prevents the Commission from granting SWB the relief it requests in its application -- allowing its rate range tariff to take effect. Therefore, we dismiss as moot SWB's application for review of the Bureau's Order rejecting SWB Transmittal No. 2316. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application for review filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary