ÿWPCë ûÿ2ÿÿBJ Z  úCourier3|xBoldTimes New Roman@ɹ`7ûX@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿHP LaserJet 4M (PCL)in Rm 518 lpt2)HPLA4MP0.PRSÛx Œ @ɇÏð\ð9€aX@ÐÐûÿ2öÿÿ6ÿÿFÿÿ  ÿÿ<ª3|oCourierCourier Boldipt room 518HPLA4POS.PRSÛx Œ @ɇÏhhhhðqðYX@ÐÐCourierCourier BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman Italicÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¸ÿÿ‰?xxx,ôxÐ `É“7ûX€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¢©@|ND,hö¼|ô\  PŽ6G;¼Pþþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ¢ÿÿ‘7jC:,øÇXjô\  PŽ6G;XPþþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿþÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþþþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCourierCourier BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman ItalicCourier ItalictqqnnqqÅyyÐ2Pq7¥c1RÅК¥ššš„­n1z‘n‰ndnŸ‰ûÿ2P K(ÿÿDtK¸K "‚i~×'ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ^DO]uuĶOOOuƒ=O=AuuuuuuuuuuAAƒƒƒgרšš¨‘ƒ¨¨OY¨‘ͨ¨ƒ¨šƒ‘¨¨Û¨¨‘OAOkuOgugugOuuAAuA¶uuuuOYAuu¨uugp/p~åO=~kOOO=OOOOOOOOuA¨g¨g¨g¨g¨g͘šg‘g‘g‘g‘gOAOAOAOA¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨g¨u¨r¨u¨u¨uƒu¨g¨g¨gšgšgš~šg¨“‘g‘g‘g‘g¨u¨u¨u¨~¨u¨~¨uOAOuOOOu£ƒ~~¨u‘A‘]‘O‘O‘A¨uŠ¨u¨u¨u¨uͨšOšOšOƒYƒYƒYƒ~‘b‘A‘k¨u¨u¨u¨u¨u¨uÛ¨¨~‘g‘g‘g¨u‘O¨uƒY‘O¨u“=uuN*NW££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTŒŒTkuOguuuuàuAK±±uFK±±u±FOOgguéPPŒéuuå±éT錌TŠÂƒƒéOguÄéF"šššš±±×ééu±éŒ‡~uƒåŒŒéuRCourierCourier BoldTimes RomanCourier ObliqueTimes Roman Italic"‚i~×'ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ^:DPdd¨œDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX¸„„|pDL|°p„p|¼|D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8œddddDL8ddddX`(`låD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXX°‚„X|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXX„X„X„l„X~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdŒplld|8|P|D|D|8dvdddd°„D„D„DpLpLpLpl|T|8|\dddddd¼l|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddÀd8@˜˜d<@˜˜d˜<DDXXdÈDDxÈddÄz˜ÈHÈxxHv§§ppÈDXd¨È<"„„„„˜˜¸ÈÈd˜ÈxtldpÄxxÈd‰"‚i~×'ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ^#)0<ÔÐ Èé Ðrecord to show that it does not recover more than a reasonable amount of its overhead and Ô °x!Ôinclude certain cost projection and cross©elasticity information, as required by Sections Ô ‘XHÒ- °xÔ61.49(g)(2) and 61.49(h)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ÀÀÀÀ 61.49(g)(2) and 61.49(h)(1).ÖaéH{¯SÔ ‘Xt ´<ÔÑ#oô\  PŽÂCã‚XP#ÑMCI Petition at 4.aÖ Ô ‘X ´- ` È›ÔÁxÁØ‚4.ØÁ` `  ÁIn response, Ameritech contends that there is no requirement that its cost support Ô ‘X Ò- °xäÔdata be publicly available.Öké ,¯SÔ ‘Xà´<ÔÑ#oô\  PŽÂCã‚XP#ÑAmeritech Opposition at 1©2.kÖ In addition, Ameritech maintains that the question of whether Ô °xLÔproposed rates are too high or too low in this case should be determined not by an analysis of Ô °xÔthe cost support data but by a comparison of the proposed rates with corresponding rates for Ô °x.Ôother OPP term plans. According to Ameritech, the filing contains rates that are lower in price Ô ‘X§ Ò-Ôcompared to the existing payment plans.Ö^ë§ Ý¯SÔ “X5´<ÔÃÃÑ#oô\  PŽÂCã‚XP#ÑIdÄÄ. at 3.^Ö Ô ‘Xb´- ` ÈnÔÁxÁØ‚5.ØÁ` `  Á We have reviewed that tariff filed by Ameritech, and all the associated pleadings. Ô °xóÔWe conclude that no compelling argument has been presented that the tariffs are patently unlawful so as to warrant reject and that an investigation is not warranted at this time. Ô ‘X´-ÔÁxÁØ‚6.ØÁ` `  ÁACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED Ô ‘Xª´- ` È»ÔÁxÁØ‚7.ØÁ` `  ÁÔ ÇØj ÔIT IS FURTHER ORDEREDÔ ÇØj Ô that the petition to reject, or in the alternative, to Ô °xÔsuspend and investigate Ameritech Transmittal No. 863 filed by MCI Telecommunications Corporation IS DENIED. Ô ‘X7´-Ô ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁGeraldine A. Matise ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁChief, Tariff Division ÁxÁÁ` `  ÁÁ¸ ¸ ÈÁÁðÁÁhhÁCommon Carrier BureauÔ"­!0*0*0*°°ý á"ÔŒ