NOTICE


    *********************************************************     
       

                         NOTICE


   *********************************************************


This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect.  

If the original document contained--

                    *  Footnotes
                    *  Boldface & Italics

--this information  is missing in this version

The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed
too.

If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect
version.

For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file
pnmc5021.

File  pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory
\pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous.

*****************************************************************
********
$// Order; Litel v. Ind. Bell; File Nos. E-92-30 et al.; DA 95-588//$
$/ 1.711 Formal or informal complaints /$
$///DA 95-588 3/23/95///$
///newjob///                    Before the                                 
                     FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.  20554
          
In the Matter of     )
          )
LITEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, )
          )
          Complainant,          )
          )
          v.         )
          )
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., )    File No. E-92-30
THE OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,)     File No. E-92-31
WISCONSIN BELL, INC.,)     File No. E-92-32
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, and  )    File No. E-92-38
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,)     File No. E-92-39
          )
          Defendants.)           

                                   ORDER

           Adopted:  March 21, 1995;  Released:March 29, 1995

By the Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch, Enforcement
Division, Common Carrier Bureau:

     1.  On January 29, 1992, LiTel Telecommunications Corporation
filed the above-captioned complaints against the defendants seeking to
recover damages from the defendants for alleged violations of the
Commission's rules in connection with the defendants' computation and
assessment of terminating carrier common line ("CCL") charges.  On
March 13, 1995, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the
complaints stating that the parties have negotiated a mutually
agreeable settlement of all pending controversies.

     2.  We are satisfied that granting the parties' joint motion to
dismiss the complaints with prejudice will serve the public interest
by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of
further time and resources of the parties and of the Commission.

     3.  Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), and the
authority delegated in Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R.  0.291, that the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss IS GRANTED.

     4.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned complaints ARE
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the proceedings ARE TERMINATED.

          FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION

                                      
          Thomas D. Wyatt
          Chief, Formal Complaints and
             Investigations Branch
          Enforcement Division
          Common Carrier Bureau