WPC  2BJ Z CourierCourierCourier Bold2x6X@`7X@HP LaserJet 4_230_1HPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\_)^X@2F6NFZX#|xCourier 10cpiCG Times (Scalable)Courier 10cpi (Bold)Courier 10cpi (Italic)HP LaserJet IIIHPLASIII.PRSx  @,\,]XX@<?xxx,2x6X@`7X@<R&HHH,,H6X@`7h@?xxx,)x `7XhnicalTechnical Document Style<624vxpk^ka8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2fv ta2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2l  d   a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2  ] %  a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2~+a1DocumentgDocument Style StyleXqq   l ^) I. ׃  Doc InitInitialize Document Style  0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgTech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . 227a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   25d&2a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . PleadingHeader for numbered pleading paperP@n   $] X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:>q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx _ ?` ԍ Id. at para. 30. > Finally, we declined to grant a blanket waiver to other LECs, but stated that other LECs seeking a waiver comparable to one granted in the 500 Access Waiver Order would warrant "expedited  ? consideration."A x_ ? ԍ Id. at para. 31.A 4.  Lincoln states that it plans to establish a nonrecurring charge to be assessed on a perorder basis, regardless of the  ?( number of NXX codes specified in the service order.B ( _ ? ԍ Lincoln Waiver Petition at 2.B Lincoln asserts that its proposed waiver request closely matches that of  ? Pacific Bell, granted in the 500 Access Waiver Order.6 _ ? ԍ Id. at 23.6  ?H h# III. DISCUSSION ă 5. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule  ? where there is "good cause" to do so,j( _ ?X ԍ See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.3. j and where the particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public  ?0 interest.^0 _ ?x ԍ WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). ^ Further, the Commission's grant of a waiver must be based on articulated, reasonable standards that are predictable,  ? workable, and not susceptible to discriminatory application.sH _ ?! ԍ Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990).s We conclude that the waiver Lincoln seeks here is substantially similar to the waivers granted in the 500 Access Waiver Order to  ? establish nonrecurring charges for 500 access service.Y_ ?H& ԍ See 500 Access Waiver Order at para. 28.Y Therefore, we find that Lincoln has shown good cause for the waiver it seeks.00*((Ԍ ? ԙ < IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ă 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for waiver filed by Lincoln Telephone and Telegraph Co. IS GRANTED. ` `  hh#(FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ` `  hh#(Geraldine A. Matise ` `  hh#(Acting Chief, Tariff Division ` `  hh#(Common Carrier Bureau ` `  hh#(-