********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************

                           Before the
               Federal Communications Commission
                     Washington, D.C. 20554

Cable Television Association of Georgia, et al.        )
                                   )
          Complainant                   )
                                   )    File No. PA 01-002
          v.                       )
                                   )
Georgia Power Company,                  )
          Respondent                    )

                             ORDER

     Adopted:  March 6, 2001                 Released:  March 7, 2001    

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

      1.   In this Order, we consider a motion ("Motion"), filed by the above-captioned Complainant,
for an extension of time to file a reply to a Response filed by the above-captioned Respondent.  Complainant
filed its Complaint on January 17, 2001, pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  224. Respondent filed its Response on
February 16, 2001.  Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.1407 (a), a reply from Complainant is due
by March 8, 2001.  Complainant requests that the time for filing a reply be extended to March 15, 2001. In
support of its Motion, Complainant argues that it did not receive a copy of the Response until February 22,
2001. Complainant states that Respondent does not oppose its Motion. 

      2.   It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.
However, in this instance, Complainant has provided us with a compelling reason that supports an extension
of time.  Because there was a delay in Complainant receiving a copy of the Response, Complainant requires
the extension in order to provide the Commission with a complete and accurate reply.  Moreover,
Respondent has agreed to the brief extension of time.  Therefore, we will extend the time for filing a reply
until March 15, 2001.

      3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407, that Complainant's Motion for Extension of Time
IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. 

                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              Kathleen F. Costello, Acting Chief
                              Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                              Cable Services Bureau