******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 TCI Cablevision of Montana, Inc. ) d/b/a AT&T Cable Services ) Complainant, ) ) File No. PA 00-002 v. ) ) Energy Northwest, Inc. ) Respondent. ) ORDER Adopted: May 15, 2000 Released: May 16, 2000 By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order, we consider a motion for extension of time to file a response ("Motion"), filed by Energy Northwest, Inc., ("Respondent"), to a complaint ("Complaint") filed by TCI Cablevision of Montana d/b/a AT&T Cable Services ("Complainant") on April 14, 2000 pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  224. Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  1.1407 (a), a response is due by May 15, 2000. The Motion was filed as an emergency motion pursuant to 47 C.F.R.  1.46 on May 12, 2000. The Respondent requests that the time for responding to the Complaint be extended to May 24, 2000. In support of its Motion, Respondent argues that its counsel discovered a conflict of interest requiring Respondent to obtain new counsel as of May 11, 2000. Respondent also argues that it may be a person who is cooperatively organized and the extension will allow Respondent time to ascertain the facts necessary to determine whether the Commission has jurisdiction to resolve the Complaint. Respondent states that the Complainant does not oppose its Motion. 2. It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. However, Respondent has provided us with a compelling reason that warrants an extension of time. Indeed, an extension in this case will allow Respondent to verify facts pertaining to the Commission's jurisdiction to resolve the complaint. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407, that Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen F. Costello, Acting Chief Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau