******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) Cable Telecommunications Association of ) Maryland, Delaware & the District of Columbia, et al. ) Complainant, ) ) PA No. 2000-001 v. ) ) Baltimore Gas & Electric Company and ) Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc., ) Respondent. ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 1, 2000 Released: March 2, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. By this Order, we deny a Motion for an extension of time to file a response filed by Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, ("BG&E") in a pole attachment complaint proceeding filed by the Cable Telecommunications Association of Maryland, Delaware & the District of Columbia, et al. ("Complainant") In the Matter of Cable Telecommunications Association of Maryland, Delaware & the District of Columbia, et al, v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company and Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.("Complaint"). BG&E moves for an extension of time within which to file its response to the Complaint until we rule on issues of jurisdiction raised in the Motion to Dismiss ("Motion to Dismiss"). Complainant filed an Opposition to BG&E's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for an Extension of Time ("Opposition"). 2. Our rules provide that a response to a pole attachment complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the complaint. Under our rules, a response to the Complaint would be filed on or before March 3, 2000. It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. 3. BG&E has not provided us with any compelling reason that would warrant an extension of time. Section 1.1407(a) of our Rules provides for a response to a complaint and a reply by the complainant to the response, and further provides that "[e]xtensions of time to file are not contemplated unless justification is shown pursuant to Section 1.46 [and e]xcept as otherwise provided in Section 1.1403, no other filings, and no motions other than for extensions of time will be considered unless authorized by the Commission." We will rule on the jurisdictional issue in our normal course of consideration of the Complaint based on our three established pleadings, and when we have a full record on which to base our consideration. We therefore deny an extension of time in which to file a response. A timely response is due on or before March 3, 2000. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.46, and Subpart J of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R., Subpart J, that the Motion for an Extension of Time to file a response IS DENIED 5. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau