******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) CUID No. GA0088 (Chickamauga) ) Comcast Cablevision ) ) Refund Plan and Complaint Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier Rates ) REFUND PLAN AND RATE ORDER Adopted: February 8, 2000 Released: February 10, 2000 By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider a complaint concerning the rates the above-referenced operator ("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. We have already issued an order ("Prior Order") addressing the reasonableness of Operator's CPST rate for the period December 27, 1993 through May 14, 1994. In our Prior Order, we stated that our findings "do not in any way prejudge the reasonableness of the price for CPS service after May 14, 1994 under our new rate regulations." On June 2, 1995, Operator filed a refund plan ("Refund Plan") pursuant to our Prior Order. This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's CPST rates beginning May 15, 1994 as well as Operator's Refund Plan. 2. Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. If the Commission finds a rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act") requires the Commission to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber or local franchise authority ("LFA"). The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") and our rules implementing the new legislation ("Interim Rules"), require that, beginning February 8, 1996, complaints against CPST rates be filed with the Commission by an LFA that has received more than one subscriber complaint. 3. Operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series to justify rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994. Cable operators may file an FCC Form 1210 to justify quarterly rate increases based on the addition and deletion of channels, changes in certain external costs and inflation. Operators may justify their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels that are projected for the twelve months following the rate change. Any incurred cost that is not projected may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time. 4. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1200, we find Operator's calculated MPR of $11.14 to be reasonable. The Commission's rules provide for a refund liability deferral period, if timely requested by Operator, beginning May 15, 1994 and ending July 14, 1994, for any overcharges resulting from Operator's calculation of a new MPR on the FCC Form 1200. Operator elected to defer refund liability for overcharges associated with its FCC Form 1200 pursuant to the Commission's Rules. However, Operator will incur refund liability from May 15, 1994 through July 14, 1994 for any CPST rates charged above the FCC Form 393 MPR approved by the Commission. In our Prior Order, we found that Operator had justified an MPR of $12.13. Because Operator's actual CPST rate of $12.46, effective May 15, 1994 through June 30, 1994, exceeds its FCC Form 393 MPR, we find Operator's actual CPST rate of $12.46, effective May 15, 1994 through June 30, 1994, to be unreasonable. Because Operator's actual CPST rate of $11.48, effective July 1, 1994, exceeds its FCC Form 1200 MPR of $11.14, we find Operator's actual CPST rate of $11.48, effective July 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995, to be unreasonable. 5. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1210 covering the period April 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995, we find Operator's calculated MPR of $12.13 to be reasonable. Because Operator's actual CPST rate of $11.48, effective January 1, 1996 does not exceed its MPR, we find Operator's actual CPST rate of $11.48, effective January 1, 1996, to be reasonable. Upon review of Operator's Refund Plan filed pursuant to our Prior Order, we find that the Refund Plan fulfills the requirements of the Refund Order, provided Operator accrues refund interest up to the date of refund. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rate of $12.46, charged by Operator in the community referenced above, effective May 15, 1994 through June 30, 1994, IS UNREASONABLE. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rate of $11.48, charged by Operator in the community referenced above, effective July 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995, IS UNREASONABLE. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the CPST rate of $11.48, charged by Operator in the community referenced above, effective January 1, 1996, IS REASONABLE. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321 and 76.962 of the Commission's rule, 47 C.F.R.  0.321 and  76.962, that Operator's Refund Plan IS APPROVED, provided Operator modifies its Refund Plan to the extent indicated herein, and that Operator implement its refund plan within 60 days of the date of this Order and file a certificate of compliance with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, within 90 days of the release of this Order certifying its compliance with this Order. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that Operator shall refund to subscribers in the franchise area referenced above that portion of the amount paid in excess of the maximum permitted CPST rate of $12.13 per month (plus franchise fees), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through June 30, 1994. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that Operator shall refund to subscribers in the franchise area referenced above that portion of the amount paid in excess of the maximum permitted CPST rate of $11.14 per month (plus franchise fees), plus interest to the date of the refund, for the period July 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Operator shall promptly determine the overcharges to CPST subscribers for the stated periods and shall within 30 days of the release of this Order, file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount so determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund with 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint referenced herein against the CPST rates charged by Operator in the community referenced above IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen F. Costello, Acting Chief Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau