******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Time Warner Entertainment/Advance- ) File No. PA 98-002 Newhouse Partnership, et al. ) Complainants ) v. ) ) Florida Power & Light Company ) Respondent ) ORDER Adopted: September 14, 1999 Released: September 16, 1999 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order, we consider an application for review ("Application") of a Cable Services Bureau ("Bureau") action taken pursuant to delegated authority, and a request for stay of that action ("Request for Stay"), filed by Florida Power & Light Company ("Respondent") on July 14, 1999. On June 9, 1999, the Bureau released an Order, DA 99-1120 ("Prior Order"), which resolved a pole attachment complaint filed by the above referenced complainants ("Complainants") pursuant to Part 1, Subpart J of the Commission's rules. In this order we dismiss the Application because it was not filed in a timely manner pursuant to the Commission's rules. We also dismiss the Request for Stay as moot. 2. On April 13, 1998, the Complainants filed a complaint alleging that the rates charged by Respondent for pole attachments were unjust and unreasonable. Our Prior Order found the rates charged by Respondent to be unreasonable, established a maximum pole attachment rate and ordered a refund of all payments made in excess of the maximum pole attachment rate. 3. The Commission's rules state that "[a]ny person aggrieved by any action taken pursuant to delegated authority may file an application requesting review of that action by the Commission." The application for review must be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action, which in this case, is the release date. Documents are considered filed when they are received by the Commission. 4. The Application was received by the Commission on July 14, 1999. The 30 day period from the release of our Prior Order expired at the end of July 9, 1999, which was a Friday. The Application was filed five (5) days late. The Application is not accompanied by a request for a waiver of the filing time limits nor does it include any explanation for the lateness or plead extenuating circumstances. 5. Compliance with procedural requirements is essential to the orderly and expeditious conduct of Commission business and to fairness to all parties. The Commission has dismissed applications for review as procedurally defective when they were filed one day late. This is a routine pole attachment rate complaint and the Complainants would be adversely affected if the filing deadline was waived. Therefore, we will dismiss the Application. Because we dismiss the Application, the Respondent's Request for Stay is now moot and will also be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.0101, 0.321 and 1.115(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.0101, 0.321 and 1.115(d), that Florida Power & Light Company's Application for Review and Request for Stay ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau