********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )  
                                )  CUID No.  TX0024 (Port Lavaca)
Cable One, Inc.                 )            
                                )            
Complaint Regarding             )
Cable Programming Services Tier Rates)


                             ORDER

   Adopted:  May 28, 1999               Released:  June 1, 1999  

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we consider a complaint against the above-referenced operator ("Operator") for
its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above.  We have already issued a
separate order in which we found Operator's rates in effect before May 15, 1994 to be unreasonable ("Prior
Order").  In our Prior Order, we stated that our findings "do not in any way prejudge the reasonableness of
the prices for CPS service after May 14, 1994 . . ."  This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's
CPST rates in effect after May 14, 1994. 

     2.   Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission")
is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates
charged are not unreasonable.  The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992
Cable Act"), and our rules in effect at the time the complaints were filed, required the Commission to review
CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber.  The filing of a valid complaint triggers an
obligation upon the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates.  If the Commission finds the rate
to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability.  

     3.   To justify rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994, operators must use the FCC Form
1200 series.  Operators are permitted to make changes to their rates on a quarterly basis using FCC Form
1210.  Operators may adjust their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240.  Operator filed an FCC
Form 1200 to justify two CPSTs ("CPST-1" and "CPST-2").  
 
     4.   Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1200, we find Operator's actual CPST rates of $9.21
for its CPST-1 and $8.63 for its CPST-2, effective May 15, 1994, to be reasonable.  

     5.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R. 0.321 that the CPST rates of $9.21 and $8.63, charged by Operator in the community referenced
above, effective May 15, 1994, ARE REASONABLE. 

     6.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.32l of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
0.321, that the complaint against the CPST rates charged by Operator in the community referenced above,
IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN.

     7.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Operator shall promptly determine the overcharges to
CPST subscribers for those periods covered by our Prior Order, DA 95-1071, and shall within 30 days of the
release of this Order, file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount
so determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan
to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. 

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 



                         Patrick A. Boateng
                         Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                              Cable Services Bureau