********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                        )
                                   )
Time Warner Cable                       )    CUID No.   SC0080 (Horry)
                                   )
Order Denying Jurisdiction                   )


                             ORDER

      Adopted:  May 21, 1999            Released:  May 25, 1999   

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we dismiss a complaint against the rates that the above-referenced ("Operator")
was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above because
the complaint concerns rates that are outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission
("Commission"). 

     2.   Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the CPST rates of cable systems
not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid complaint.  In a Memorandum Opinion and Order
released November 10, 1997 ("Prior Order"), the Commission found that Operator's system serving the
community referenced above is subject to effective competition.  Based on our finding of effective competition
in our Prior Order, Operator's system in the franchise area in the community referenced above is not subject
to rate regulation.  Therefore, the complaint does not trigger the Commission's jurisdiction and will be
dismissed.  

     3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 543(a)(2)(A) and (B), that the referenced complaint
against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the community referenced above IS DISMISSED.
     4.   This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.321.


                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              Patrick A. Boateng
                              Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                              Cable Services Bureau