******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) TIME WARNER CABLE OF NEW YORK ) File No. CSB-A-0151 CITY AND QUEENS INNER UNITY CABLE ) CUID Nos. NY1280 SYSTEMS ) NY1281 ) NY1340 Request to Dismiss Application for Review) NY1402 of Local Rate Order Issued by the) City of New York, New York ) ORDER Adopted: March 29, 1999 Released: April 1, 1999 By the Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. Time Warner Cable of New York City and Queens Inner Unity Cable System (collectively, "Time Warner"), the franchisees in the above matter, filed on April 28, 1995 an Application for Review of the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Cable Services Bureau on March 29, 1995 denying Time Warner's appeal of a local rate order of the City of New York, New York (the "City) adopted on August 31, 1994. In its rate order, the City established rates for basic tier service and associated equipment in four franchise areas and required Time Warner to refund overcharges to subscribers. 2. On July 19, 1996 Time Warner filed with the Commission a Request for Dismissal of its Application for Review filed on April 28, 1995. In its Request, Time Warner states that further review of the Commission's decision affirming the City of New York's Rate Order is no longer necessary because Time Warner and the City have resolved the underlying rate dispute. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Time Warner's Request for Dismissal IS GRANTED and the Application for Review IS DISMISSED. 4. This action is taken by the Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R.  0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deborah E. Klein Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division Cable Services Bureau