******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Suburban Cable TV Company, Inc. ) CUID No. PA0096 (East Hempfield) ) ) Complaint Regarding ) Cable Programming Services Tier Rate ) ORDER Adopted: February 16, 1999 Released: February 18, 1999 By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order we consider a complaint against the February 15, 1995 rate increase of the above- referenced operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community referenced above. In response to the complaint, Operator filed an FCC Form 1200 and multiple FCC Form 1210s. This Order addresses only the reasonableness of Operator's February 15, 1995 CPST rate increase. 2. Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates charged are not unreasonable. The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 ("1992 Cable Act"), and our rules in effect at the time the complaint was filed, required the Commission to review CPST rates upon the filing of a valid complaint by a subscriber. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates. If the Commission finds the rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability. 3. To justify rates for the period beginning May 15, 1994, operators must use the FCC Form 1200 series. Operators are permitted to make changes to their rates on a quarterly basis using FCC Form 1210. 4. Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1200, and FCC Form 1210s covering the period from April 1, 1994 through March 31, 1995, we find that Operator has justified its February 15, 1995 CPST rate of $14.31. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the February 15, 1995 CPST rate of $14.31, charged by Operator in the community referenced above, IS REASONABLE. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaint referenced herein against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the community referenced above IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Patrick A. Boateng Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau