********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                   )    CUID Nos.      PA0525 (Elizabeth)
                              )              PA0532 (White Oak)
TCI of Pennsylvania, Inc.               )              PA0715 (Rostraver)
                              )              PA1209 (Scott)
Complaints Regarding                    )              PA1210 (Heidelberg)
Cable Programming Services Tier Rates   )              PA1212 (Greentree)
 

                             ORDER

     Adopted:  January 11, 1999         Released:  January 14, 1999  

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we consider complaints against the June 1, 1998 rate increase of the above-
referenced operator ("Operator") for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the communities
referenced above.  All prior complaints against Operator's CPST rate increases have been resolved. 
Accordingly, this Order addresses only the reasonableness of Operator's June 1, 1998 CPST rate increase.

     2.   Under the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission")
is authorized to review the CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition to ensure that rates
charged are not unreasonable.  The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") and our rules implementing
the legislation ("Interim Rules"), require that a complaint against the CPST rate be filed with the Commission
by a local franchising authority ("LFA") that has received more than one subscriber complaint.  

     3.   The LFA for the franchise areas referenced above filed complaints with the Commission on
November 27, 1998 against Operator's June 1, 1998 CPST rate increase from $17.90 to $19.30.  The LFA
verified that it received more than one subscriber complaint for each community.  The filing of a complete and
timely complaint triggers an obligation upon the cable operator to file a justification of its CPST rates.  The
Operator has the burden of demonstrating that the CPST rates complained about are reasonable.  If the
Commission finds a rate to be unreasonable, it shall determine the correct rate and any refund liability.  

     4.   Operators may justify their rates on an annual basis using FCC Form 1240 to reflect
reasonably certain and quantifiable changes in external costs, inflation, and the number of regulated channels
that are  projected for the twelve months following the rate change.   Any incurred cost that is not projected
may be accrued with interest and added to rates at a later time.  

     5.   Upon review of Operator's FCC Form 1240 for the projected period June 1, 1998 through May
31, 1999, we find that Operator has justified its calculated maximum permitted ("MPR") of $19.84.  Because
Operator's actual CPST rate of $19.30, effective June 1, 1998, does not exceed its MPR, we find Operator's
actual CPST rate of $19.30 to be reasonable.    

     6.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47
C.F.R. 0.321, that the CPST rate of $19.30, charged by Operator in the communities referenced above,
effective June 1, 1998, IS REASONABLE.

     7.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
Section 0.321, that the complaints referenced herein against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the
communities referenced above ARE DENIED.


                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 



                              Margaret M. Egler
                              Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                              Cable Services Bureau