********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                )
                                )
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/)     CUID No.  FL0492 (Clearwater)
Newhouse Partnership            )
                                )
Order Denying Jurisdiction      )


                             ORDER

   Adopted:  January 11, 1999           Released:  January 13, 1999  

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we dismiss complaints against the rates that the above captioned operator
("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community set forth above
because the complaints concern rates that are outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications
Commission ("Commission"). 

     2.   Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the CPST rates of cable systems
not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid complaint.  In a Memorandum Opinion and Order
released December 12, 1996 ("Prior Order"), the Commission found that Operator's system serving the
community referenced above is subject to effective competition.  Based on our finding of effective competition
in our Prior Order, Operator's system in the franchise area in the community referenced above is not subject
to rate regulation.  Therefore, the complaints do not trigger the Commission's jurisdiction and shall be
dismissed.  

     3.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 543(a)(2)(A) and (B), that the complaints
against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the community referenced above ARE DISMISSED.
     4.   This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321.


                              FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



                              Margaret M. Egler
                              Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                              Cable Services Bureau