WPC`[ 2?BJ%<Courier3|a #&a\  P6G;r&P#Times New RomanTimes New Roman Bold P6G;&PpX@Times New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman Italicu&P#2,qK ZCourierTimes New Roman"i~'^5>I\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\HP LaserJet 4HPLAS4.PRS 4&J\  P6Q\%p&P2a=5,r&a\  P6G;&P)1>Rd{'3 windowsdevicesportsintl+" r!"1 - MM 2 ^nE 3|J  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)\QQQQQzzQpQpQpQpQ=3=3=3=3\\\\\\\\\\Q\\\\\f\\QQzQzQzQpQpQpQ\\\\\\I\=\===\G\p3pK\\\z=zKfGfGN@.S\=Q\\\\\39\7\7==QQ\==\\=Q=7t=eeeegoo.Ijg2Z\\yeCpj`vZefeloPpPj`e~~tro.=K\\!==\g.=.3\\\\\\\\\\33gggQzzpf=Gpfzfpp=3=V\=Q\Q\Q=\\33\3\\\\=G3\\\\QX%Xc=\Q\\=f===QQ@\=G=.=\\\\%\=3\g=\Ie77=jS.=79\Qzpppp====gf\QQQQQQzQQQQQ3333\\\\\\\e\\\\\\\Times New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman ItalicCG Times6Q,,x$tY&P I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)2@K X vTv"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd2CRdd$CCdq2C28dddddddddd88qqqYzoCNzoozzC8C^dCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddCN8ddddY`(`lCdYddCoCCCYYFdCNC2Cdddd(dC7dqCdPn<dYzzzzCCCCqodYYYYYYYYYYY8888dddddddnddddddd2a=5,r&a\  P6G;&P7jC:,Xj\  P6G;XP7nC:,4Xn4  pG;X2e=5,d[&e4  pG;&CCddCdCg\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>ggg\yyrF\yrgyy>3>j\>\gQgQ>\g3>g3g\ggQF>g\\\QI(I_>0_j>>>0>>>>>>\>g3\\\\\QyQyQyQyQD3D3D3D3g\\\\gggg\\g\\\\pg\\\QQ_QyQyQyQyQ\\\_\gjF3FgF>Fgg__gy3ySy>yIy3ggg\\QQQgFgFgFg_y^y>yjgggggg_yQyQyQgy>ggFy>\0\\=2=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBa\>\\\\\\7>\7>\7>>\\\??n\\pBnnBsgg>\\7"yyyy\nlc\gnn\VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV%-77\V%%7>%7777777777>>>1eOIIOC=OO%+OCbOO=OI=COOhOOC%%47%17171%777V7777%+77O77155%T7,OOOOOO=7111111I111117777777<77777772=K0KX3K6K9"i~'^ %,77\V%%%7>%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%%%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lCTn(nBB(A\\>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn7*7DSS77S^*7*.SSSSSSSSSS..^^^Jxooxf]xx7Axfxx]xo]fxxxxf7.7NS7JSJSJ7SS..S.SSSS7A.SSxSSJP!PZ7SJSS7]777JJ:S7A7xx*7SSSS!S7.S^7SC[227`L*724S}}}Jxxxxxxoffff7777xxxxxxx^xxxxxx]SJJJJJJoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSSS"i~'^09FSS999Sq+9+/SSSSSSSSSS99qqqSggnxggxx9In]nxgxgS]xgg]]?/?FS9SSISI/SS//I/xSSSS??/SInII?C/CZ9+ZF999+999999S9S/gSgSgSgSgSnnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/nSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]IgSxSxSxS]IxSgSgSgSgSnInInZnIxdgIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999SSZZnI]/]<]9]5]/nSanSnSxSxSng?g?g?S?S?S?ZZ]<]/]FxSxSxSxSxSxSn]Z]?]?]?xS]9nSS?]9]Sd+SS8%8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddN8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""M\\>>>\}0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>}}}\rryrr>Qygyrr\grrggF3FM\>\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\FF3\QyQQFI3Ic>0cM>>>0>>>>>>\>\3r\r\r\r\r\yyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3y\\\\\\\\\gQr\\\\gQ\r\r\r\r\yQyQycyQnrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\\ccyQg3gBg>g;g3y\jy\y\\\yrFrFrF\F\F\FccgBg3gM\\\\\\ygcgFgFgF\g>y\\Fg>g\n0\\=(=WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNBnnB_\F\\\\\\3;\7;\7>>gg\??n\\pBnnBb\\>g\7"yyyy\njc\}nn\*7FSS$77Sq*7*.SSSSSSSSSS77qqqSffoxffxx7Jo]oxfxfS]xff]]A.AFS7SSJSJ.SS..J.xSSSSAA.SJoJJAC.CZ7S]SS7S777]]:S7A7o]*ASSSS.S7.Sq7SC[227`W*724S}}}Sffffffoffff7777xoxxxxxqxxxxx]fSSSSSSSoJJJJJ....SSSSSSS[SSSSSJS"i~'^#)0<States is allocated to a market based on which homemarket stations receive a preponderance of total"  ,**88!"  xviewing hours in the county. For purposes of this calculation, both overtheair and cable television  S-viewing are included.s$( yO@- xK#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Because of the topography involved, certain counties are divided into more than one sampling unit. Also, in  xcertain circumstances, a station may have its home county assigned to an ADI even though it receives less than a  {O- xpreponderance of the audience in that county. For a more complete description of how counties are allocated, see  {O-Arbitron's Description of Methodology. #K\  P@QQwP#s  S- ` ~x3. ` ` Under the Act, however, the Commission is also directed to consider changes in market areas. Section 614(h)(1)(C) provides that the Commission may: xwith respect to a particular television broadcast station, include additional xcommunities within its television market or exclude communities from such  S-xstation's television market to better effectuate the purposes of this section.( yO -#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#47 U.S.C. 534(h)(1)(C).#K\  P@QQwP#Ѹ In considering such requests, the Act provides that: xthe Commission shall afford particular attention to the value of localism by xtaking into account such factors as x(I) whether the station, or other stations located in the same area, have xbeen historically carried on the cable system or systems within such xcommunity; x(II) whether the television station provides coverage or other local service xto such community; x(III) whether any other television station that is eligible to be carried by a cable xsystem in such community in fulfillment of the requirements of this section xprovides news coverage of issues of concern to such community or provides xcarriage or coverage of sporting and other events of interest to the community; xand x(IV) evidence of viewing patterns in cable and noncable households within the  Sx-xareas served by the cable system or systems in such community.!xD( yO\ -#C\  P6QQwP##C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 614(h)(1)(C)(ii), 47 U.S.C. 534(h)(1)(C)(ii).#K\  P@QQwP#!  S(-x4. ` ` The legislative history of this provision indicates that: xwhere the presumption in favor of ADI carriage would result in cable subscribers xlosing access to local stations because they are outside the ADI in which a local xcable system operates, the FCC may make an adjustment to include or exclude xparticular communities from a television station's market consistent with Congress' xobjective to ensure that television stations be carried in the areas in which they"8,`(`(88 "Ԍxserve and which form their economic market.  S-X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:-xused by cable systems to manipulate their carriage obligations to  S -xavoid compliance with the objectives of this section. Further, this sectionxx 0(#(#Xxis not intended to permit a cable system to discriminate among several xstations licensed to the same community. Unless a cable system can xpoint to particularized evidence that its community is not part of one xstation's market, it should not be permitted to single out individual stations"v#,`(`(88%"Ԍxserving the same area and request that the cable system's community be deleted  S-xfrom the station's television mar ket. ( X@-#C\  P6QQwP##Xj\  P6G;XP#э#C\  P6QQwP#H.R. Rep. No. 102628, supra, at 9798. #Xx{2 PQ XP#  S- ` x7. ` ` In adopting rules to implement this provision, the Commission indicated that changes  S`- xyrequested should be considered on a communitybycommunity basis rather than on a countybycounty  x.basis, and that they should be treated as specific to particular stations rather than applicable in common  S- x[to all stations in the market. Xy( yO) - xY#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#8 FCC Rcd at 1977 n. 139. Viewership information cited herein is county data rather than communityspecific  xydata. However, absent evidence that such data is not fairly reflective of viewing in the actual communities in  yO -question, we accept such data as probative in cases of this type. #K\  P@QQwP# The rules further provide, in accordance with the requirements of the Act,  S-that a station not be deleted from carriage during the pendency of an ADI change request. ( yO! -#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#47 C.F.R. 76.59.#K\  P@QQwP#ѱ  S- MODIFICATION ARGUMENTS ă  SH - ` nx8. ` ` The communities served by Comcast's systems are located in the western portion of Santa  xBarbara County, California, and are part of the Santa BarbaraSanta MariaSan Luis Obispo ADI. Oxnard,  x\California, KADY's city of license, is also part of the same ADI and is, on average, 69 miles from the cable communities.  S - ` Qx9. ` ` In support of its modification request, Comcast argues that KADY should be excluded  xlfrom carriage on its systems because the station does not satisfy any of the four statutory market  xmodification factors. First, the station has a limited record of historic carriage. Comcast states that the  xstation began operation in l985, but has carried by the systems only since the middle of l996 because of  S- xthe "artificial demands of must carry."c )( {O-#C\  P6QQwP#эPetition at 3.c Comcast contends that the Commission has rejected such a short  S- xperiod of time as representing historic carriage for modification purposes. \( {O- x#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Comcast cites Dynamic Cablevision of Florida, Ltd, et al., 11 FCC Rcd 9880 (1996), aff'd 12 FCC Rcd 9952  {O- x(1997), and Northstar Television of Providence, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 1736 (1996), for the proposition that two years  yO-of carriage does not amount to "historic carriage."#K\  P@QQwP# In addition, Comcast states  xthat the station has not been carried on its systems since June l998 because of KADY's failure to provide  xan adequate offair signal to the systems' headends. Secondly, Comcast maintains that KADY does not  xprovide local coverage for its system due to the following: a) Oxnard, California, KADY's city of license,  xis 58 miles from the closest cable community, Santa Ynez, and 86 miles from the most distant cable  xjcommunity, Santa Maria; b) KADY's Grade B contour does not cover any of the cable communities; and  xc) KADY does not carry any programming providing "local coverage" of the system's communities.  xThird, Comcast asserts that its systems carry "a host of stations," licensed in and around Santa Barbara  Sx- xCounty, which provide Grade B contour coverage, actual offair signals, and extensive coverage of local"x ,`(`(88"  S- xnews and sporting events.( yOh- x#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#The local stations carried by the system include: KEYT(ABC), Santa Barbara, KSBY(NBC), San Luis Obispo,  {O0-and KCOY(CBS), Santa Maria.#K\  P@QQwP# #C\  P6QQwP#Petition at 6.#K\  P@QQwP#ѥ In addition, Comcast states that the systems carry a "Santa Barbara  xjCommunity" channel, which provides programming by and for the cable communities local governments.  xIn addition, the systems carry a local origination channel that highlights local news and sports coverage.  x[Finally, Comcast argues that since KADY is unable to deliver a predicted Grade B or actual offair signal  S`-to the cable communities, the station has no significant viewership in the communities.Z`"( yO"- x#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Comcast submits a study conducted by Media Strategies, based on 1997 A.C. Nielsen ratings for Santa Barbara County, which demonstrate a minimal level of viewing in the area in which the cable communities are located.Z  S- ` x10. ` ` In opposition, Biltmore states that it acquired KADY in July l998, and that the station was  x=previously under the control of a bankruptcy trustee. During this period, the station's technical facilities  xdeteriorated, and it was not able to deliver an acceptable signal to Comcast's headends. Biltmore states  S- xthat it has taken steps to repair and improve the station's technical capabilities.Zz( yO- x#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Biltmore states that it has filed an application with the Commission to increase the station's effective radiated  xpower, and a request for an interim power increase. Biltmore contends that the proposed changes will increase  {OB-KADY's signal coverage into the Santa BarbaraSanta MariaSan Luis Obispo ADI. Opposition at 6. In addition, Biltmore  xMcontends that it has replaced faulty microwave relays and is now capable of delivering a good quality  SH - xsignal to Comcast's headends.H ( {O-#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Id.#K\  P@QQwP#Ѧ Biltmore states that the station has begun broadcasting a 10 o'clock news  xMprogram focusing on events and issues of interest to viewers in the cable communities and eight daily  x\weathercasts, which include updates on weather conditions in the communities. Biltmore argues that  xComcast has exaggerated its contention that the cable systems carry a "host of stations" providing local  xLprogramming, in that Comcast proposes to carry only three of the five broadcast stations licensed to the  S - x local market.z . ( yON- x,#C\  P6QQwP##C\  P6QQwP##C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Comcast has also filed a petition seeking to modify the market of television station KJLA, Ventura, California  {O-(CSR 5293A).  Opposition at 11.z Biltmore argues that the Commission should not give weight to Comcast's arguments  xyregarding lack of viewership when analyzing a market modification involving a small independent station.  xBiltmore concludes that the mustcarry provisions were intended to protect a station such as KADY, a  xsmall independent station emerging from bankruptcy, and that deletion of cable communities which  xrepresent nearly twenty percent of the station's market will have a devastating effect on Biltmore's efforts to return the station to economic viability.  Sh- ` _x11. ` ` In reply, Comcast argues that KADY lacks an adequate nexus with the cable communities,  xand that carriage of the station would constitute an unwarranted commercial windfall to the station,  S- xextending its viewership far beyond the area covered by its offair signal. Comcast contends that it has  x/monitored the station's signal quality after the filing of Biltmore's opposition, and despite Biltmore's  x.assertions to the contrary, KADY is still delivering a "generally unviewable signal" at the cable systems'  S- xheadends. ( {O%-#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Reply at 12. Comcast states that the station's current level of locallyoriented programming is de minimis,  xMand questions Biltmore's commitment to the communities, in that the programming began airing three  xkweeks after the filing of Comcast's petition. Rather, Comcast argues that the true test of the station's"R,`(`(88"  xyconnection to the communities should be based on its past local programming efforts. Comcast contends  S- xthat KADY does not provide significant local service while other stations carried on the systems do  S- xkprovide extensive local service.8"( {O- x#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#Comcast cites Rifkin/Narragansett South Florida, CATV Limited Partnership, d/b/a Gold Coast Television, 11  xFCC Rcd 21090 (l996), for the proposition that the issue of local carriage by other stations becomes a stronger factor  xywhere it is clear that the station in question for ADI modification is not providing a local service to the cable communities. #K\  P@QQwP#8 Comcast argues that Biltmore cannot state that it provides Grade B  xcoverage to any of the cable communities, or that it is not geographically remote from those communities.  xComcast states that KADY's viewership ratings in the cable communities are "almost nonexistent" in  xcable and noncable households in the western part of Santa Barbara County where the cable communities  S- xare located, and concludes that the lack of viewership confirms the absence of any connection between  S-the station and the communities.( S: -ԍ#C\  P6QQwP#Reply at 13.#&J\  P6Qr&P#ш  S-( DISCUSSION ă  SH - ` x12.` ` Based on our analysis of the evidence relating to the four statutory and other relevant  x0factors, Comcast's petition for market modification is granted. As an initial matter, we note that,  x>according to the legislative history of the 1992 Cable Act, the use of ADI market area is intended "to  xensure that television stations be carried in the areas which they service and which form their economic  S - x<market."{ R( {O-#C\  P6QQwP#эH.R. Rep. 102628, supra at 97 (1992).{ The ADI market change process incorporated into the Communications Act, however, is neither  x intended to be a process whereby cable operators may seek relief from the mandatory signal carriage  x=obligations apart from the question of whether a change in the market area is warranted, nor a vehicle for  xbroadcast stations to reach service areas that otherwise they could not serve. When viewed against this  xbackdrop, and considering all of the relevant factual circumstances in the record, we believe that the  xoperator's exclusion petition appears to be a legitimate request to redraw ADI boundaries to make them  x[harmonious with market realities. Comcast's actions do not reflect an intention to skirt its signal carriage  xresponsibilities under the Communications Act and the Commission's Rules, nor do they evidence a pattern of discriminatory conduct against KADY.  S- ` _x13.` ` We do not believe that Biltmore has satisfied the first statutory factor, as KADY has only  xa brief history of carriage on Comcast's systems, and the station has been carried under the mandates of  xthe Act and the Commission's mandatory carriage rules. The Commission has held that such carriage does  S-not rise to the level of historic carriage in analyzing a cable operator's market modification petition.( {O$!-#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#See Dynamic Cablevision of Florida, Ltd., et al., supra.    SP- ` x14.` ` With respect to the second statutory factor regarding local programming service, we have  S(- xheld that the presence of a Grade B contour over a community is evidence generally sufficient to satisfy"(v ,`(`(88{"  S- xLthis factor.( yOh- x#C\  P6QQwP#эAs a general matter, we note that the Commission has determined that a station's local service to cable  {O0- xZcommunities can be measured, among other ways, by the coverage of its Grade B contour. See Broadcast Signal  {O- xCarriage Issues, 8 FCC Rcd at 2077. See also Amendment of Section 76.51 (OrlandoDaytona Beach, Melbourne,  {O- xand Cocoa Beach, Florida), 102 FCC 2d at 1070 ("We believe that television stations actually do or logically can rely on the area within their Grade B contour for economic support.")  In this case, however, KADY does not place either a Grade A or Grade B contour over the  xcable communities. Biltmore has provided no specific information pertaining to its application to upgrade  x=KADY's effective radiated power. With respect to programming service, KADY has shown only that it  x>recently began broadcasting a minimal amount of programming of specific local interest or import for  S`- xzcable viewers in the communities in question. Therefore, we conclude that KADY does not meet this statutory factor.  S- ` 2x15. ` ` We also believe that Comcast's carriage of other local television stations provides support  xLfor the action requested. Where a cable operator is seeking to delete a station's mandatory carriage rights  xin certain communities, the issue of local coverage by other stations becomes a factor to which we will  xgive greater weight than in cases where a party is seeking to add communities. In this case, we find the  x=stations carried by Comcast to have a closer nexus to the cable systems herein than does KADY. These  xmarket facts, coupled with the distance between the cable systems and KADY, support Comcast's arguments under the third statutory factor.  S - ` x16.` ` With regard to viewership, it appears that KADY has a negligible level of viewership in  xMthe cable communities. Biltmore has presented no evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, this factor supports Comcast's request for modification of its market.  S- ` x17.` ` We also note that as of January 1, 2000, KADY will be designated as part of the Los  xyAngeles Designated Market Area (DMA), and will accordingly have mustcarry rights in that market and  S- xnot in its current ADI.~( yO-#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#See 76.55, 47 C.F.R. 76.55.#K\  P@QQwP# In determining that Nielsen DMAs, rather than the Arbitron ADIs, will define  S- xfuture markets for mustcarry purposes and market modification requests, in Definition of Markets for  Sj-Purposes of the Cable Television Mandatory Television Signal Carriage Rules, the Commission stated: x xFor the timebeing, the Commission will rely on market modifications determined xpursuant to Section 614(h) to refine market boundaries to account for changes xin viewing patterns and market conditions. In this regard, we recognize that DMA xmarket designations are one way to determine local stations and are mindful that  S|-xinformation regarding DMAs could be useful in deciding individual cases.|( yO*!-#C\  P6QQwP#э#C\  P6QQwP#11 FCC Rcd 6201,6223 (1996).#K\  P@QQwP#ѹ  xWe believe that KADY's future designation in the Los Angeles DMA is of probative rather than  x0dispositive value in the instant matter. It does, however, weigh in favor of Comcast's request for  xmodification, particularly where the station is not currently being carried. A contrary decision would most  xzprobably alter Comcast's carriage requirements only for the current ADI designation, thereby creating unnecessary burdens for the cable operator and confusion for subscribers. "d,`(`(88"Ԍ S- ` x18.` ` Given the evidence as to the statutory factors and KADY's DMA designation in the Los  xAngeles market, we conclude that it is logical and consistent with the objective of Section 614 of the Communications Act to delete Comcast's systems from KADY's market for mandatory carriage purposes.  S`-1 ORDERING CLAUSES ă  S- ` Ox19. ` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 614(h) of the Communications Act of 1934,  xas amended, 47 U.S.C. 534, and 76.59 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 76.59, that the petition  xjfor special relief (CSR5292A) filed on behalf of Comcast Cablevision of Santa Maria, Inc. and Comcast  S-Cablevision of Lompoc, Inc. IS GRANTED.  SH - ` #x20. ` ` This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.321. x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhWilliam H. Johnson x` `  hhDeputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau