WPC 2MBR-DCourierw Roman3|a@w Roman#XP\  P6Q9XP#CourierTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldX@grr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\CourierTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman Italic\&P2gE ZX X-#XP\  P6Q9XP#HP4M (PCL) (Additional); Local PrintHL4MPCAD.PRSx  @\"\X@|D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd<?xxx,ix6X@`7X@X7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPY2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P2e=5,&e4  pG;&2R ZSV3|jHP LaserJet 4Si (Additional)HPLA4SAD.PRSx  @\-$X@CourierTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldCourier ItalicTimes New Roman Italic S' I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)#Xj\  P6G;9XP##&a\  P6G;&P#2@ v p kj k a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2 r v t  a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2x  p  a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2 i1a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2  cTech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2qa2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   2N  3Ja7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:1(72$93$;4l>Document 1Document 11` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 5Technical 52` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 6Technical 63` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 2Technical 24 2C5l>6$#?7lGA8$ATechnical 3Technical 35 Technical 4Technical 46` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 1Technical 17 Technical 7Technical 78` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#2L9$ D:-F;KH<iJTechnical 8Technical 89` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#toc 1toc 1:` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#toc 2toc 2;` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toc 3toc 3<` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#2S=L>N?P@vStoc 4toc 4=` hp x (# !(#  !(# ` hp x (#toc 5toc 5>` hp x (#h!(# h!(# ` hp x (#toc 6toc 6?` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 7toc 7@ 23\ASBUCWDZtoc 8toc 8A` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 9toc 9B` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#index 1index 1C` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#index 2index 2D` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#2_Ee\Fv^Gl^Hre_toatoaE` hp x (#!(# !(# ` hp x (#captioncaptionF _Equation Caption_Equation CaptionG endnote referenceendnote referenceH 2 bI `J}`KaLahead1 #I'd#2p}wC@ #a1Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfJ$ a2Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfK/` ` ` a3Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfL:` ` `  2 eMRbNbOcPMda4Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfME` ` `  a5Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfNP  ` ` ` hhh a6Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfO[   a7Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfPf  2lQ>eKfKShKja8Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfQq "i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd"i~'^5>I\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\"i~'^5>g\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>ggg\yyrF\yrgyy>3>j\>\gQgQ>\g3>g3g\ggQF>g\\\QI(I_>0_j>>>0>>>>>>\>g3\\\\\QyQyQyQyQD3D3D3D3g\\\\gggg\\g\\\\pg\\\QQ_QyQyQyQyQ\\\_\gjF3FgF>Fgg__gy3ySy>yIy3ggg\\QQQgFgFgFg_y^y>yjgggggg_yQyQyQgy>ggFy>\0\\=2=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBa\>\\\\\\7>\7>\7>>\\\??n\\pBnnBsgg>\\7"yyyy\nlc\gnn\2GvKmKfoKqKs"i~'^:DpddȨDDDdp4D48ddddddddddDDpppd|Ld|pȐD8DtdDdpXpXDdp8Dp8pdppXLDpdddXP,PhD4htDDD4DDDDDDdDp8dddddȐXXXXXJ8J8J8J8pddddppppddpddddzpdddXXhXXXXXdddhdptL8LpLDLpphhp8ZDP8pppddƐXXXpLpLpLphfDtppppppȐhXXXpDppLDd4ddC6CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxHjdDdddddd8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%%%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lCTn(nBB(A\\>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn7"i~'^5>M\\>>>\}0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>}}}\rryrr>Qygyrr\grrggF3FM\>\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\FF3\QyQQFI3Ic>0cM>>>0>>>>>>\>\3r\r\r\r\r\yyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3y\\\\\\\\\gQr\\\\gQ\r\r\r\r\yQyQycyQnrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\\ccyQg3gBg>g;g3y\jy\y\\\yrFrFrF\F\F\FccgBg3gM\\\\\\ygcgFgFgF\g>y\\Fg>g\n0\\=(=WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNBnnB_\F\\\\\\3;\7;\7>>gg\??n\\pBnnBb\\>g\7"yyyy\njc\}nn\ ?xxx,-Nx6Nhez7XH"y.X80,IX\  P6G;P #H5!,,5\  P6G;,P\%{,W80,<W*f9 xr G;X\5hC:,<Xh*f9 xr G;XX 6n  g `2\7bZ}<?xxx,ix6X@`7X@X7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPY2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P Z2e=5,&e4  pG;&[7nC:,|Xn4  pG;X\W!@(#,h@\  P6G;hP]y.X80,X\  P6G;P^H5!,i,5\  P6G;,P\_{,W80,-0W*f9 xr G;XP:% ,J:\  P6G;JP2^-<?xxx,ix6X@`7X@X7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPY2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P Z2e=5,&e4  pG;&[7nC:,|Xn4  pG;X\W!@(#,h@\  P6G;hP]y.X80,X\  P6G;P^H5!,i,5\  P6G;,P\_{,W80,-0W*f9 xr G;XaP:% ,J:\  P6G;JP\0_=5,-&_*f9 xr G;&X"i~'^ %,77\V%%%7>%7777777777>>>0eOIIO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%%%7O S- X    S-  Federal Communications Commission`}(#DA 981153 ă  yxdddy P Before the 3Federal Communications Commission  S-"_Washington, D.C. 20554 ă In the Matter of:) ) RCN TELECOM SERVICES OF) PHILADELPHIA, INC.) ) ) Certification to Operate an)  S - Open Video System)pp&  Xxx (#(#   S -  S -, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER d  SX-X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:   yO- &Z#X\  P6G;P#эCommunications Act  653(b), 47 U.S.C.  573 (b). Under this section the applicant agrees to comply with  &the Commission's requirements regarding nondiscriminatory carriage; just and reasonable rates, terms, and  &conditions; a onethird capacity limit on the amount of activated channel capacity on which an open video system  &operator may select programming when demand for carriage exceeds system capacity; channel sharing; sports  &exclusivity, network nonduplication, and syndicated exclusivity; and nondiscriminatory treatment in presenting  {Ot-information to subscribers. Id. See 47 C.F.R.  76.1502(a).> (c) a list of the names of the communities the  &applicant anticipates it will serve; (d) a statement of the anticipated type and amount of channel capacity  &that the system will provide; and (e) a representation as to whether the applicant is a cable operator  SX-applying for certification within its cable franchise area.pp  S- II.COMMENTS  S-  : 4.` ` PCTA states that, based on the history of the open video system operations of RCN  &Laffiliates, RCNPhiladelphia's certification application follows the same pattern in choosing large regions  &within which to become certified with no apparent intent to construct open video service facilities in each"h ,`(`(88"  S- &listed community in those regions.  yOh-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Comments at 2. PCTA further states that RCNPhiladelphia, like its sister companies,  &Lmost likely intends to leverage its open video system certification to obtain cable television franchises in  S- &some of the communities for which it requests certification.Z X yO- &#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#PCTA bases its arguments on the actions of a sister company of RCNPhiladelphia, RCNBeCoCom, L.L.C.,  &which was granted certification to operate an open video system in Boston, Massachusetts and surrounding  &communities. Subsequently, RCNBeCoCom filed to withdraw two communities from its open video system service  &Karea and held various discussions with local authorities concerning cable television franchises. RCNPhiladelphia  {O- &iComments at 2, 5, and n.6; see also Time Warner Cable v. RCNBeCoCom, L.L.C., DA 98798 at 7, n. 20 (Cab.  {O -Serv. Bur. rel. April 28, 1998) ("Time Warner"). Z PCTA asserts that the Commission's  &requirements governing open video system certification require applicants to examine the economic  &feasibility of providing open video service to a particular community before such applicant files its certification application.  S- : a5.` ` PCTA further states that RCN affiliates who have been granted open video system  &certification have attempted to circumvent the procompetitive intent of the open video system framework  S- &by designing their open video systems to serve only those multiple dwelling units where an RCNaffiliated  Sp- &=video programming provider is authorized to offer service.p yO-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Comments at 4. PCTA argues that RCNPhiladelphia seeks  &to obtain open video system certification in numerous communities in order to prevent incumbent cable  &operators from offering video programming in any of those communities. PCTA further argues that while  &.RCNPhiladelphia, like other RCN affiliates, states in its certification application that it intends to offer  &330 analog channels, reports indicate that its open video systems operated by RCN affiliates support only  S -110 video channels. d  yO-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Comments at 8, n.19.  SX- : 6.` ` PCTA states that the Commission should acknowledge the history of the open video  &system operations of RCN affiliates and take steps to avoid the same outcomes by monitoring closely  &RCNPhiladelphia's open video system operations and conditioning any grant of certification on RCN &lPhiladelphia's compliance with its obligation to provide full enrollment opportunities for all video  &programming providers. PCTA suggests that open video system certification applicants be required to file  &a separate application for each community in which it intends to offer open video service as a means of insuring that the applicant intends to offer service in that particular community.  S- III.DISCUSSION  S-  S- : 7. ` ` We have reviewed the information contained in RCNPhiladelphia's FCC Form 1275.  &!RCNPhiladelphia has applied to become a certified open video system operator in Philadelphia,  &Pennsylvania and in certain communities of Montgomery County, Delaware County, Bucks County, and  SP- &Chester County, Pennsylvania.mP  {O%-#X\  P6G;P#эSee  1, supra.m As required by Form 1275, RCNPhiladelphia's certification application  &provides: company information and a separate statement of ownership, including all affiliated entities;  &/eligibility and compliance representations; and system information, system capacity and verification" ,`(`(88k"  &jstatements. RCNPhiladelphia indicates that it has served the designated telecommunications officials of  &[communities affected by its application in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the Counties of Montgomery, Delaware, Bucks, and Chester, Pennsylvania.  S`- : A8.` ` We have also reviewed the comments filed in response to RCNPhiladelphia's Form 1275.  S8- &PCTA has questioned RCNPhiladelphia's intent with regard to offering open video service to each of  &the communities listed in its certification application. As an initial matter, we note that the FCC Form  &>1275 does not require an open video system applicant to evidence that it has conducted an economic  S- &yfeasibility study before filing its certification application. In Time Warner, Time Warner Cable urged the  &-Commission to revoke certain RCN open video system certifications based on statements made by officials  &=of RCN which indicated that RCN did not intend to offer open video system service in each community  SJ - &in which it was certified.J  {O -#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Time Warner at  21. At that time, we stated that "while we question certain of RCN's statements...  &the record is not adequately developed to address Time Warner's allegations that RCN does not intend  S - &.to offer open video system service in its intended service area." Z {O-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Id. at 22. While in the case before us, we do not  &find evidence sufficient to find that RCN does not intend to offer open video system service in the  &communities listed on its FCC Form 1275, we note that our open video system rules contemplate a  &<complaint process to resolve such issues. PCTA has not asked us to deny RCNPhiladelphia's certification  &application, instead, it has asked us to monitor RCNPhiladelphia's open video system operations and has  &suggested that we require open video system applicants to file a separate certification application for each  &{community for which it intends to offer open video service. With regard to PCTA's suggestion of  &separate filings, we note that the Commission's rules governing open video system certification do not  &require separate filings for each community within an open video system applicant's intended service area.  &.In addition, the FCC Form 1275 requires open video system certification applicants to list the names of  &the local communities in which the applicant intends to operate. In order to require separate filings for  &>each community, the Commission would have to act to amend its rules governing open video system certification, an action that is outside the scope of the certification application review process.  S- : 39.` ` PCTA also was concerned with the apparent practice of RCN affiliates to design their  &network to serve only those multiple dwelling units where RCN's own video programming provider  &already offers service and to deny service to single family homes and other multiple dwelling units. We  &Ltake note of the Commission's rules prohibiting open video system operators from discriminating among  S*- &kvideo programming providers with regard to carriage on its open video system.* {O-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#See 47 C.F.R.  76.1503(a). We further note our  &complaint procedures contained in Section 76.1503 of the Commission's rules should evidence develop  S-that RCNPhiladelphia's representations regarding its intended service areas prove untruthful.~ yO"-#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#47 C.F.R.  76.1503.  S- : p10.` ` PCTA is also concerned that RCNPhiladelphia seeks to become certified in a large  &service area containing numerous communities in order to impede an incumbent cable operator's  S:- &[opportunity to obtain capacity as a video programming provider with the same region. In Time Warner,  S - &?we clarified our rules as they pertain to competing, inregion cable operators by stating that "[a]n" ,`(`(88!"  &incumbent cable operator is a competing, in region cable operator where there is an actual overlap between  S- &/a cable operator franchise area and a specific community served by an open video system operator."  S- &(emphasis added)G {O- &#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#Time Warner at  10.#X\  P6G;P# RCNBeCoCom has filed a petition for reconsideration of the Commission's Time  {O-Warner decision.G Thus, as Time Warner makes clear, open video system certification applicants are not  &able to stifle competition because the restriction applies only to the communities actually served by the  &jopen video system operator. With regard to whether RCNPhiladelphia will actually offer 330 channels,  &the Commission's rule only requires an open video system applicant to state its "anticipated" channel  S-capacity on FCC Form 1275.$ {O -#X\  P6G;P#э#X\  P6G;P#See 47 C.F.R.  76.1502(c)(7).   S- : 11.` ` We find that RCNPhiladelphia has provided the requisite facts and representations  &zconcerning the open video system it intends to operate and has certified that it "agrees to comply and  &remain in compliance with each of the Commission's regulations" under Section 653(b) of the  &Communications Act. We note that, if any representation in RCNPhiladelphia's certification filing proves  & to be materially false or materially inaccurate, the Commission retains the authority to revoke RCN &[Philadelphia's certification or impose such other penalties it deems appropriate, including forfeiture. We  &further find that PCTA has not raised issues which warrant denial of RCNPhiladelphia's certification application.  S\- IV.ORDERING CLAUSES  S - : 12.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED , that the certification application of RCN Telecom  &Services of Philadelphia, Inc. d/b/a RCN of Philadelphia to operate an open video system in the  &communities of: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Abington, Ambler, Bridgeport, Bryn Athyn, Cheltenham,  &Collegeville, Conshohocken, East Norritin, Hatboro, Hatfield Borough, Hatfield Township, Horsham,  &Jenkintown, Lansdale, Lower Merion, Lower Moreland, Lower Providence, Montgomery, Naberth,  &Norristown, North Wales, Perkiomen, Plymouth, Rockledge, Schwenksville, Souderton, Springfield,  &Telford, Towamencin, Trappe, Upper Moreland, West Conshohocken, West Norriton, and Whitemarsh in  &kMontgomery County, Pennsylvania; Aldan, Aston, Bethel, Brookhaven, Chadds Ford, Chester City,  &Chester Heights, Chester Township, Clifton Heights, Collingdale, Colwyn, Concord, Darby Borough,  &LDarby Township, East Lansdowne, Eddystone, Edgemont, Folcroft, Glenolden, Haverford, Lansdowne,  &Lower Chichester, Marcus Hook, Marple, Media, Middletown, Millbourne, Morton, Nether Providence,  &Newtown, Norwood, Parkside, Prospect Park, Radnor, Ridley, Ridley Park, Rose Valley, Rutledge, Sharon  &Hill, Springfield, Swarthmore, Thornbury, Tinicum, Trainer, Upland, Upper Chichester, Upper Darby,  &Upper Providence, and Yeadon in Delaware County, Pennsylvania; Bensalem, Bristol Borough, Bristol  &Township, Falls, Hulmeville, Langhorne, Langhorne Manor, Lower Makefield, Lower Southhampton,  &[Middletown, Morrisville, Newtown Borough, Newtown Township, Pendel, Telford, Tullytown, Upper  &`Southhampton, Warminster, and Yardley in Bucks County, Pennsylvania; Downington, Easttown,  Sd- &Malverne, Phoenixville, Tredyffrin, West Chester, and Westtown in Chester County, Pennsylvania IS  S<- GRANTED .  $c@8 `" ,`(`(88!"  S- : C $c@9 13.` ` This action is taken by the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to the authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321. ` `  ,hh^FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ` `  , ` `  ,hh^John E. Logan ` `  ,hh^Acting Chief, Cable Services Bureau "p,`(`(88"  S- APPENDIX A ă  S8- BUCKS COUNTY Bensalem Bristol Borough Bristol Township Falls Hulmeville Langhorne Langhorne Manor Lower Makefield Lower Southhampton Middletown Morrisville Newtown Borough Newtown Township Pendel Telford Tullytown Upper Southhampton Warminster Yardley  S- CHESTER COUNTY Downington Easttown Malverne Phoenixville Tredyffrin West Chester Westtown  S- DELAWARE COUNTY Aldan Aston Bethel Brookhaven Chadds Ford Chester City Chester Heights Chester Township Clifton Heights Collingdale Colwyn"&,`(`(88n("ԌConcord Darby Borough Darby Township East Lansdowne Eddystone Edgemont Folcroft Glenolden Haverford Lansdowne Lower Chichester Marcus Hook Marple Media Middletown Millbourne Morton Nether Providence Newtown Norwood Parkside Prospect Park Radnor Ridley Ridley Park Rose Valley Rutledge Sharon Hill Springfield Swarthmore Thornbury Tinicum Trainer Upland Upper Chichester Upper Darby Upper Providence Yeadon  S -  S - MONTGOMERY COUNTY Abington Ambler Bridgeport Bryn Athyn Cheltenham Collegeville Conshohocken"&,`(`(88n("ԌEast Norritin Hatboro Hatfield Borough Hatfield Township Horsham Jenkintown Lansdale Lower Merion Lower Moreland Lower Providence Montgomery Naberth Norristown North Wales Perkiomen Plymouth Rockledge Schwenksville Souderton Springfield Telford Towamencin Trappe Upper Moreland West Conshohocken West Norriton Whitemarsh  S-