********************************************************    
                         NOTICE
********************************************************

This document was converted from
WordPerfect to ASCII Text format.

Content from the original version of the document such as
headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers
will not show up in this text version.

All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the
original document will not show up in this text version.

Features of the original document layout such as
columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins
will not be preserved in the text version.

If you need the complete document, download the
WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available.

*****************************************************************
                            Before the
                Federal Communications Commission
                      Washington, D.C. 20554
               
In the Matter of                )
                                )
Buenavision Telecommunications of Boyle)     CUID No. CA1285 (Los Angeles)
Heights, Inc.                   )                           
                                )
                                )
Complaint Regarding             )
Cable Programming Services Tier )                                     
Rate Increase                   )


                             ORDER

     Adopted:  August 28, 1997          Released:  September 3, 1997

By the Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

     1.   In this Order we dismiss a complaint against the rate that the above-captioned operator
("Operator") was charging for its cable programming services tier ("CPST") in the community set forth
above because the complaint concerns a  rate that is outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications
Commission ("Commission").  Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the CPST rates
of cable systems not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid complaint.  Based upon the
information provided by the Operator, we find that Operator's system in Los Angeles is subject to effective
competition.

     2.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 543(a)(2)(A) and (B), that the complaint
against the CPST rate charged by Operator in the community referenced above IS DISMISSED.

     3.   This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


                         Margaret M. Egler
                         Acting Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
                         Cable Services Bureau