WPC} 2MBERKZ3|X X-#XP\  P6Q9XP#"i~'^5>I\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\HP4M (PCL) (Additional); Local PrintHL4MPCAD.PRS&a\  P6G;\"\&P2gEKX X-#XP\  P6Q9XP#"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd2a=5,0&a\  P6G;&P7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPC:\TEMP\WPVAS{TD.1\WP}WP{PJ.1H" rB - MM N&o) 3`'^B(Z\ @^.$h'j;U2 K< Z0 3|X"i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+99999999S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNI\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\33gggQyyrg>Frgygrr>3>T\>Q\Q\Q>\\33\3\\\\>F3\\\\QX%Xc>0cT>>>0>>>>>>>>\3QQQQQwyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3\\\\\\\\\\Q\Z\\\g\QQQyQyQycyQtrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\gcc\r3rIr>r>r3\l\\\\y>y>y>gFgFgFgcrMr3rT\\\\\\crQrQrQ\r>\gFr>\t0\\=!=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBT\>Q\\\\\3;\7;\7>>QQ\??n\\pBnnBmgg>Q\7"yyyy\njc\gnn\"i~'^5>g\\>>>\g0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>ggg\yyrF\yrgyy>3>j\>\gQgQ>\g3>g3g\ggQF>g\\\QI(I_>0_j>>>0>>>>>>\>g3\\\\\QyQyQyQyQD3D3D3D3g\\\\gggg\\g\\\\pg\\\QQ_QyQyQyQyQ\\\_\gjF3FgF>Fgg__gy3ySy>yIy3ggg\\QQQgFgFgFg_y^y>yjgggggg_yQyQyQgy>ggFy>\0\\=2=WxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNBnnBa\>\\\\\\7>\7>\7>>\\\??n\\pBnnBsgg>\\7"yyyy\nlc\gnn\"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd2%vipkOka8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2Wvtra2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2]  U  a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2 Na5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2HTech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2"  V!!a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   23)"v#3#/%a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:>Right Par 5Right Par 5-` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 6Right Par 6.` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 7Right Par 7/` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 8Right Par 80` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#2jG1(@2$B3$D4lFDocument 1Document 11` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 5Technical 52` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 6Technical 63` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 2Technical 24 2L5lG6$H7l,J8$JTechnical 3Technical 35 Technical 4Technical 46` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 1Technical 17 Technical 7Technical 78` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#2lU9$L:O;0Q<NSTechnical 8Technical 89` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#toc 1toc 1:` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#toc 2toc 2;` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toc 3toc 3<` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#2n\=U>W?Y@v[toc 4toc 4=` hp x (# !(#  !(# ` hp x (#toc 5toc 5>` hp x (#h!(# h!(# ` hp x (#toc 6toc 6?` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 7toc 7@ 2eA\B^C`Dbtoc 8toc 8A` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 9toc 9B` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#index 1index 1C` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#index 2index 2D` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#2hEJeFvhgGlgHrJhtoatoaE` hp x (#!(# !(# ` hp x (#captioncaptionF _Equation Caption_Equation CaptionG endnote referenceendnote referenceH 2kIhJ}miKiLrjhead1 #I'd#2p}wC@ #a1Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfJ$ a2Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfK/` ` ` a3Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfL:` ` `  2mM7kNkO~lP2ma4Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfME` ` `  a5Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfNP  ` ` ` hhh a6Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfO[   a7Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfPf  2uQ#nKnK8qKsa8Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfQq "i~'^09]SS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS99]]]Sxnxxng?Snxgx]nxxxxn9/9aS9S]I]I9S]/9]/]S]]I?9]SxSSIC%CW9+Wa999+999999S9]/xSxSxSxSxSxxInInInInI>/>/>/>/x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSf]xSxSxSxIxIxWxIx{nInInInISSSWS]a?/?]?9?]]WW]n/nKn9nCn/x]xx]x]SSxxIxIxI]?]?]?]WnUn9nax]x]x]x]x]x]xxWnInInIx]n9x]]?n9xSz+SS8-8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN%7777777777>>>0eOIIOD>OO%*ODaOO>OI>DOOgOOD%%37%07070%777V7777%*77O77055;%;3%%%%%%%%%%%7O0O0O0O0O0aHI0D0D0D0D0%%%%O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O7O0O7O6O7O7O7>7O0O0O0I0I0I;I0OED0D0D0D0O7O7O7O;O7O;O7%%7%%%7M>;;O7DD,D%D%DO7AO7O7O7O7aOI%I%I%>*>*>*>;D.DD3O7O7O7O7O7O7gOO;D0D0D0O7D%O7>*D%O7E77%%WMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(BB(37%07777j7#TT7!#TT7T!%%007n&&Bn77lCTn(nBB(A\\>>n%07\n!"IIIITTenn7TnB@;7>lBBn7"i~'^"(22TN"""28"2222222222888,\HBBH>8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d""M\\>>>\}0>03\\\\\\\\\\>>}}}\rryrr>Qygyrr\grrggF3FM\>\\Q\Q3\\33Q3\\\\FF3\QyQQFI3Ic>0cM>>>0>>>>>>\>\3r\r\r\r\r\yyQrQrQrQrQ>3>3>3>3y\\\\\\\\\gQr\\\\gQ\r\r\r\r\yQyQycyQnrQrQrQrQ\\\c\c\>3>\>>>\\ccyQg3gBg>g;g3y\jy\y\\\yrFrFrF\F\F\FccgBg3gM\\\\\\ygcgFgFgF\g>y\\Fg>g\n0\\=(=WddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNBnnB_\F\\\\\\3;\7;\7>>gg\??n\\pBnnBb\\>g\7"yyyy\njc\}nn\y.X80,X\  P6G;P2a=5,&a\  P6G;&P2e=5,&e4  pG;&7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XPy.\80,T\4  pG;P:% ,J:\  P6G;JPH5!,i,5\  P6G;,P\{,W80,%0W*f9 xr G;X\0_=5,%&_*f9 xr G;&XalLegalMonarch5163 - 4" x 2"X` {'A 'A  yO- X   P S-#&a\  P6G;&P#  Federal Communications Commission`}(#DA 971456 #Xj\  P6G;9XP#у  yxdddy Pv3 Before the Federal Communications Commission  yO} Washington, D.C. 20554 ă  S -#&a\  P6G;&P#In the Matter of  hh@h)  S-Petition for Relief of hh@h) x` `  hh@h)  S-LORILEI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.@h)  S-d/b/a THE FIRM hh@h)  SX-x` ` Petitioner,hh@h) x` `  hh@h)  S -vs.x` `  hh@h)ppCSR 4832L x` `  hh@h)  S -CABLEVISION OF MONMOUTH, INC.,@h)  S -x` ` Respondenthh@h) x` `  hh@h)  S@ -For Leased Access Channelshh@h)pp T  S-  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TP  Sx-X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:the number of subscribers to the system, and explained that the fulltime leased access rates could be  xreadily ascertained from the parttime rates by multiplying those rates by the desired number of hours and  S- xzdays.8* ʶ yO -ԍ Response at 10.8 Cablevision also faxed a letter to the Firm on September 20, 1996, detailing its fulltime rates,  x[explaining that its rates were calculated in full compliance with the Communications Act of 1934 and the  xNFCC's rules, and noting that inclusion of infomercials in the homeshopping category expressly is  S- xauthorized by the Commission's rules.; ʶ yO$-ԍ Response at 1112.; Cablevision states that the letter also indicated that it believed  x?that all of its leased access channel provisions were in compliance with FCC regulations with one  xLexception. Cablevision asserts that the letter informed the Firm that it was in the process of revising the  xprovision which placed a 90 day review period on the application of a leased access contract in order to"(J ,O(O(II"  xcomply with a recent FCC decision. Cablevision contends that its rates, policies and response to the Firm were in compliance with the Commission's rules.  S- IV.xDISCUSSION  S8- ` x7.` ` The Firm's petition raises a number of questions including : (1) whether Cablevision  xviolated the Commissions's leased access rules by its failure to provide the Firm with rates for fulltime  xleased access service and other leased access information within the rule's time period; (2) whether the  xparttime leased access rates quoted by Cablevision exceeded the maximum reasonable rates that could  xbe charged consistent with the Commissions rules at the time; and (3) whether Cablevision's leased access  x<channel provisions and programming classifications are inconsistent with Commission rules and improperly allow for editorial control.  S -x A.` ` Requests For Leased Access Information  S - ` Px8.` ` At the time of the filing of petitioner's complaint, Section 76.970(e)R ʶ {O-ԍ See 47 C.F.R. 76.970(e) (1996).R of the Commission's  x[rules stated that within seven business days of a prospective leased access programmer's request, a cable  xsystem operator must provide the programmer with the following information: (1) a complete schedule  xjof the operator's fulltime and parttime leased access rates; (2) how much of the operator's leased access  x.setaside capacity is available; (3) rates associated with technical and studio costs; and (4) if specifically requested, a sample leased access contract.  S- ` x9. ` ` The Firm contends that Cablevision violated Commission regulations in effect at the time  xybecause it had requested information on August 28, 1996, but only received a response on September 16,  x1996. In contrast, Cablevision states that it did not receive the August 28, 1996 request, but first learned  x]of the request on September 5, 1996, when the Firm sent a second fax. Cablevision states that its  xSeptember 16, 1996 response is within the time period provided under the rules at the time. We note that  S- xthe record indicates that this fax was sent on August 28, 1996.@Zʶ yO-ԍ Petition at Exhibit 2.@ We presume that since it was sent,  S- x\someone at Cablevision received it. Therefore, we find that Cablevision's response was not provided  xwithin the seven business days required under the Commission's rules. However, we note that there is  xynothing in the record to indicate that Cablevision had any intent to delay or avoid providing leased access  xinformation to the Firm and, in fact, provided most of the information requested in response to the second  x>fax. Because Cablevision was responsive shortly thereafter, and in view of the fact that we will now  xrequire it to provide revised information, in this instance we will not penalize Cablevision for its violation  xlof the rule for failure to timely respond to the Firm's initial fax. We further note that as requested  xCablevision provided leased access rates and a sample contract. However, the Firm also requested the  xspecific set aside capacity of the system. In its correspondence with the Firm, Cablevision indicated only  xthat it has sufficient capacity available to accommodate a fulltime channel lease and did not provide  S - xspecific capacity information.g ʶ yO%-ԍ Response of Cablevision of Monmouth, Inc. ("Response") at 12.g At the time of the filing of the Firm's complaint, Section 76.970(e) of  xthe Commission's rules provided that "[w]ithin seven business days of a prospective leased access  xprogrammer's request, a cable operator must provide such programmer with . . . information [regarding]"!z,O(O(IIU#"  S- x. . . how much of the operator's leased access set aside capacity is available. . . ."Tʶ {Oh-ԍ See 47 C.F.R. 76.970(e) (1996).T Thus, we hold that  xCablevision must supply the Firm with specific information regarding the leased access setaside capacity  S-that is available.5ZZʶ {O- xԍ We note that the Second Order amends 79.970 by increasing the time period for cable operator responses  xto programmer requests for leased access information to fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the written request. 5 x  S`- xB.` ` Leased Access Rates  S- ` x10. ` ` The Firm asserts that Cablevision's leased access rates exceeded the maximum reasonable  S- xrates for parttime leased access channel capacity that may be established under 76.970 of the rules. |ʶ {O - xԍ See 47 C.F.R. 76.970. See also 47 U.S.C. 532(c)(4)(A), which authorizes the Commission to determine the maximum reasonable rates that a cable operator may establish for leased access capacity.   S- xIn its initial Rate Order, the Commission adopted a "highest implicit fee" formula as the method of setting  x/maximum reasonable rates that a cable operator may charge any nonaffiliated programmer for leased  Sr- xaccess. The Commission recently modified this methodology in the Second Order by adopting an  x"average implicit fee" formula. With respect to the rates for parttime leased access programming, we note  xthat at the time of filing, Section 76.970(e) of the Commission's rules allowed cable operators to charge  x=different rates for different times of day provided that the total rates for a 24hour period did not exceed  xthe maximum rate for one day of a fulltime leased access channel (prorated evenly from the monthly rate  S - x.derived in accordance with 76.970 (b),(c) and (d)).P ʶ {O"-ԍ See 47 C.F.R. 76.970 (1996).P In the Second Order, we noted that this approach  xrecognizes that different time slots have different values, furthers the statutory goal of promoting a  xdiversity of programming sources, and promotes the full use of leased access channels by making non S6-prime time slots less expensive than primetime slots, and therefore more attractive to programmers.F6h ʶ {O>-ԍ Second Order at 70.F  S- ` x11.` ` With respect to the Firm's claim that Cablevision's parttime rates violated the  xNCommission's regulations, we note that from the record it does not appear that any leased access  xpayments were actually made to Cablevision by the Firm. Consequently, because new regulations  xgoverning leased access rates recently have been adopted, we do not believe it would serve any purpose  xto request additional information from Cablevision in order to determine if its proposed rates properly  xwere calculated under the former "highest implicit fee" regulations. Instead, Cablevision should provide  xthe Firm and any other potential leased access user with new rates based upon the average implicit fee  S- x@formula specified in the Second Order for the calculation of leased access rates and follow the  xCommission's rules for parttime rates. Moreover, any future inquiries or negotiations regarding leased access rates or other leased access information should be resolved under our new rules.  S0-x C.` ` Cablevision's Leased Access Provisions  S- ` $x12. ` ` The Firm challenges Cablevision's programming categories asserting that they result in" ,O(O(IIL"  x improperly calculated rates. The Firm further challenges certain leased access provisions. The Firm  S- xMcontends that Cablevision's program categories?ʶ yO@-ԍ Petition at Exhibit 4.? do not comport with Commission required program  xcategories and that Cablevision improperly classified the Firm's programming. At the time of filing,  xSection 76.970(f) identified three program categories to be used in making leased access fee calculations:  x(1) programming for which a perevent or perchannel charge is made; (2) programming more than fifty  xpercent of the capacity of which is used to sell products directly to customers; and (3) all other  S- xprogramming.$Xʶ {O - xԍ In the Second Order, the Commission abolished the previous distinction between rates charged to direct sales  xprogrammers and rates charged to "all others," on the grounds that it was more appropriate to base maximum rates  xKon the value of channel capacity determined under the leased access regulations than on the different economies  {Ob -among leased access programmers. See Second Report,  49. We find that Cablevision's program categories, although labelled differently, paralleled  xthe Commission's program categories and that Cablevision has defined their categories according to the  S- xlanguage of 76.970(f), in effect at the time of filing.@Dʶ yO-ԍ Petition at Exhibit 4.@ The Firm has made no showing that Cablevision improperly classified their programming in any category.  SH - ` #x13. ` ` With respect to Cablevision's leased access channel provisions, we disagree with the Firm  xLthat Cablevision tried to exercise improper editorial control over its programming through its provisions.  xyCablevision did not refuse to air the Firm's programming or request that the Firm change its programming  xformat. Finally, with respect to Cablevision's time restraints place on applications, we note that in  S - xl Anthony Giannotti v. Cablevision System Corporation, DA 961450, (rel. September 6, 1996), the  xyCommission held that a 90 day application period was unreasonable when the leasing involved individual  xNprogramming rather than a full time channel, and required the cable operator to adopt a more brief  xKapplication period. In its response, Cablevision stated that it was in the process of reducing its application  S - xperiod from 90 days to 20 days to conform with this Commission decision. Consequently, no further action is warranted.  S- xD.` ` Requested Relief  SB- ` x14.` ` The Firm requests relief in the form of compensation for time expended, costs incurred,  xand lost revenues in bringing this action before the Commission. Specifically, the Firm requests $700,000  S- x.in compensatory damages. Nothing in the Commission's rules provides for recovery of costs associated  x\with the filing of a petition for relief relating to the leased access regulations. Accordingly, the Firm's  S-request for compensation for such costs and revenues is denied.CXʶ yO!- xԍ The Firm provided no evidence of lost revenues, other than its speculation that its petition would be pending  xxbefore the Commission for 14 months, nor did it provide evidence that Cablevision engaged in conduct justifying issuance of a forfeiture. C  SR- V. xORDERING CLAUSES  S- ` x15.` ` For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Cablevision comply with this Order as  x/noted herein. In particular, Cablevision is required to provide to the Firm information regarding how" ,O(O(II="  xmuch of its leased access setaside capacity is available. Cablevision must also establish a new schedule  xof rates based upon the average implicit fee formula and adopt an application period for parttime users  xthat is consistent with Commission's decision on the issue. In all other respects, the petition for relief  S-filed by Lorilei Communications, Inc. in File Number CSR 4832L IS DISMISSED .  S8- ` _x16.` ` This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.321. x` `  FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  Meredith J. Jones x` `  Chief, Cable Services Bureau  X -#Xj\  P6G;9XP#