WPCZ] 2MB%RK<3|X Times New RomanTimes New Roman BoldP\  P6Q9XP#"i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+99999999S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN/>/>/>/x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSf]xSxSxSxIxIxWxIx{nInInInISSSWS]a?/?]?9?]]WW]n/nKn9nCn/x]xx]x]SSxxIxIxI]?]?]?]WnUn9nax]x]x]x]x]x]xxWnInInIx]n9x]]?n9xSz+SS8-8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN8HH"&H>XHH8HB8>HH^HH>"".2",2,2,"222N2222"&22H22,006"6."""""""""""2H,H,H,H,H,XAB,>,>,>,>,""""H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H2H,H2H1H2H2H282H,H,H,B,B,B6B,H?>,>,>,>,H2H2H2H6H2H6H2""2"""2F866H2>>(>">">H2;H2H2H2H2XHB"B"B"8&8&8&86>*>>.H2H2H2H2H2H2^HH6>,>,>,H2>"H28&>"H2?22!!WFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN$<<$.2",2222`2 LL2 LL2L"",,2d"" 18 yO@-ԍ 47 C.F.R. 76.59.>  Xy-  ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES ĐTP  XK- ` x8.` ` Signal Carriage Complaint (CSR4882M). Maranatha argues in support of its  xcomplaint that it qualifies for mandatory carriage on Garden State's system, and that the system  xis not carrying its full complement of mustcarry signals. Maranatha states that it requested  xcarriage on the system on September 30, 1996. Maranatha further states that on October 30,  xz1996, Garden State rejected Maranatha's request, claiming that WFMZTV did not provide a  xygood quality signal to Garden State's principal headend. Maranatha argues that Garden State's  xKsignal test data are insufficient to demonstrate that WFMZTV's signal is inadequate. Maranatha  xstates that Garden State's measurements were made with an antenna only 30 feet above ground  xjlevel, while Garden State's actual signal receiving antennae at its headend are located on a 250 x-foot tower. Maranatha also notes that Garden State's measurements were made using a zerogain  x\antenna, and it is not likely that Garden State uses zerogain antennae to receive other UHF  xsignals. In any event, Maranatha states that it has promised to supply to Garden State, at  xMaranatha's expense, all equipment necessary to deliver a good quality signal to the system's  xprincipal headend. Accordingly, Maranatha requests that the Commission order Garden State to commence carriage of WFMZTV.  X- ` x9.` ` Garden State concedes that Maranatha recently demonstrated, using a more  xspecialized antenna, that WFMZTV can provide an adequate signal to Garden State's principal  xheadend. Nevertheless, Garden State argues in opposition that it will seek to modify WFMZ"!x ,N(N(ZZ "ԫ xTV's ADI to remove Garden State's communities from the station's ADI. Garden State asserts  X- xthat it cannot be compelled to carry WFMZTV until Garden State's ADI modification petition is resolved.  X- ` Px10.` ` Maranatha argues in reply that Garden State's concession regarding WFMZTV's  xjsignal quality settles the case, and that Garden State should be ordered promptly to commence carriage of WFMZTV upon denial of Garden State's market modification petition.  XH- ` x11.` ` Market Modification Petition (CSR4932A). Garden State argues that the  x\communities it serves lack any significant nexus with WFMZTV, and that the communities  xshould be removed from the station's ADI. Garden State notes that it has never carried WFMZ xMTV since the station began operations in 1976. Garden State argues that the communities it  xserves are located from about 47 to 75 miles from Allentown, Pennsylvania, WFMZTV's city  xof license, and are separated from Allentown by Philadelphia and the Delaware River. Garden  xState notes that WFMZTV's predicted Grade B contour falls short of the communities, and even  xif the station should upgrade its facilities as planned, its Grade B contour will still fall short of  xGarden State communities. Garden State describes WFMZTV's programming as primarily  xsyndicated comedy and drama programs, religious programming, and paid programming, and  x=notes that WFMZTV's news programming consists of CNN Headline News and news local to  xthe Lehigh Valley around Allentown, not to Garden State's New Jersey communities. Garden  x<State argues that its system carries numerous stations licensed in New Jersey and to Philadelphia  X- xwhich provide local service to Garden State's subscribers. 18 yO- xxԍ Garden State notes that its system carries Stations KYWTV (NBC, Channel 3), WPVITV (ABC, Channel  xK6), WCAUTV (CBS, Channel 10), WPHLTV (Ind., Channel 17), WTXFTV (Ind., Channel 29), WYBE (Ind.,  xChannel 35), and WGBSTV (Ind., Channel 57), all Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; WWORTV (Ind., Channel 9),  xSecaucus, New Jersey; WGTW (Ind., Channel 48), Burlington, New Jersey; WHSP (Ind., Channel 65), Vineland,  xxNew Jersey; WNJS (ETV, Channel 23), Camden, New Jersey; and WWAC (Ind., Channel 53), Atlantic City, New Jersey. Garden State further notes that it  xKcarries local access and local origination channels which contain local news and sports coverage,  xand also The New Jersey Channel and The Cable Television Network of New Jersey. Finally,  xGarden State contends that WFMZTV has no measurable viewing in the communities in  xquestion. Accordingly, Garden State urges that WFMZTV's ADI be modified to exclude the communities Garden State serves.  X~- ` x12.` ` Maranatha argues in opposition that it has no history of carriage on Garden State's  xsystems because until recently, following improvements in WFMZTV's facilities in 1993 and  xpassage of the Satellite Home Viewing Act in 1994, WFMZTV had no right to mandatory  xcarriage on these systems. Maranatha notes that within the past year WFMZTV has gained  x-access to more than 500,000 cable homes, including the Trenton, New Jersey system and all three  xcable systems serving Philadelphia itself, immediately across the Delaware River from Garden  X- xState's system. Maranatha further notes that the Philadelphia metropolitan edition of TV Guide  xnow lists WFMZTV in the channel reference pages, and expects its programming to be listed  xin that edition commencing in June. Maranatha contends that Garden State's description of the" @ ,N(N(ZZ"  xgeography of the ADI is misleading, and states that Garden State's system is located close to the  xKPhiladelphia ADI's geographic center, in the market's core. Maranatha further contends that were  xthe Delaware River which is the entire PennsylvaniaNew Jersey border to be treated as a  xmarket boundary, no Philadelphia or other Pennsylvania station (or any Delaware station) would  xhave carriage rights anywhere in New Jersey, including on Garden State's system. Maranatha  xstates that WFMZTV provides five live daily newscasts Monday through Friday totalling two  xhours and fortyfive minutes (as well as a halfhour tape rebroadcast at 1:00 am), and also a half xhour local newscast at 5:00 pm Saturday and Sunday, each of which include substantial news  x\coverage of issues of direct concern to New Jersey residents in general, and to residents of  xBurlington, Camden, and Gloucester Counties in particular, where Garden State operates.  xxMaranatha notes that in a fourteenmonth period WFMZTV news programs reported on over 350  x>stories affecting Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester Counties including in particular the  xcommunities of Camden, Cherry Hill, and Collingswood and submits sample scripts from 51  xstories. In addition to this local news coverage, Maranatha states that WFMZTV broadcasts a  xrotation of public affairs programs Monday through Friday at 8:00 pm, including "Law Journal"  xwhich is hosted by New Jersey attorney Christopher Naughton. "Law Journal" has included  xattorneys from Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester Counties on 65 occasions since 1995. This  xprogram is carried by the Cable Television Network on Garden State's cable system, and is  Xb- xadvertised in the CourierPost, a local newspaper of general circulation in the area Garden State serves.  X- ` Bx13.` ` Maranatha argues that while Garden State claims that it carries numerous New  xJersey and Philadelphia stations, Garden State has not shown that any of these stations actually  xprovide news or other coverage of specific concern or interest to Garden State's communities.  xMaranatha notes that three of the stations Garden State carries Television Broadcast Stations  xyWGTW (Ind., Channel 48), Burlington, New Jersey; WGBSTV (Ind., Channel 57), Philadelphia,  xPennsylvania, and WTGITV (Ind., Channel 61), Wilmington, Delaware provide no news  xprogramming, and Station WPHLTV (Ind., Channel 17), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, offers only  x/a single nightly newscast at 10:00 pm. Maranatha contends that Garden State's viewership  xanalysis is simply a twopage letter from a consultant with no specific information concerning  xwhat viewing data the consultant reviewed. Nor is it surprising that the consultant found no  xviewing of WFMZTV on Garden State's system, Maranatha argues, because Garden State does  xnot carry the station. Maranatha states that it commissioned a special Nielsen study in January  x1997 which shows, based on diaries in nearly 1300 households across the Philadelphia ADI, that  xjWFMZTV reaches 120,000 households Noon to Midnight Monday through Friday, compared  xwith 178,000 homes for WGTW; 51,000 homes for WYBE; and 12,000 homes each for WTGI xTV and WHSP, all of which Garden State carries. In addition, the study recorded no viewing  x for WWAC (Ind., Channel 53), Atlantic City, New Jersey, which Garden State carries on its  xsystem. Maranatha states that 83 percent of potential viewers in Gloucester County, 79 percent  xin Camden County, and 82 percent in Burlington County are cable viewers, and argues that in  x/such a case the viewership factor is virtually indistinguishable in analysis from the historic carriage factor. "<& ,N(N(ZZ$"Ԍ X- ` x14.` ` Garden State contends in reply that the question of historic carriage of WFMZTV  xis relevant and should be considered, and that the station could have sought carriage as early as  xL1992. Garden State reiterates that WFMZTV's Grade B contour covers none of Garden States'  xcommunities, and maintains that while the communities in question may be centrally located  xwithin the Philadelphia ADI, it is WFMZTV's distance from the communities that is more  xrelevant. Garden State further contends that geographic features are legitimate boundary  xconsiderations in determining a station's market. Garden State questions WFMZTV's length of  xLcommitment to local programming, and describes one program cited by WFMZTV as simply a  xreport of Hurricane Bertha's effect on New Jersey beaches. Finally, Garden State submits an  xApril 1, 1997 letter from Media Strategies, a marketing and research consulting firm, which  X - xGarden State argues shows that WFMZTV has the lowest circulation in the Philadelphia DMA MondaySunday, 7 a.m. to 1 a.m.  X - wDISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ă  X -  X - ` 2x15.` ` We turn first to Garden State's market modification petition, to determine whether  xthe communities served by Garden State should be removed from WFMZTV's ADI. A  xresolution of this matter will determine whether WFMZTV is eligible to claim carriage rights in these communities.  X4- ` x16.` ` Based on our analysis of the evidence relating to the four statutory and other  xrelevant factors, Garden State's petition will be denied. Philadelphia is the fourth nation's largest  xpopulous television market in terms of population. It is a large market in terms of geographic  xarea, stretching from Northampton County in the north to Atlantic City and into Delaware in the  xSouth. Allentown is some 45 miles to the north of Philadelphia, the core city of the market. The  xjcable communities involved are in the New Jersey counties of Burlington, Camden, Gloucester,  X- xand Salem.N X18 yO#- xԍ In addition, Garden State seeks to delete the community of Plumsted Township from WFMZTV's ADI.  xPlumsted Township is located in Ocean County, which is part of the New York ADI. Accordingly, with respect to Plumsted Township, Garden State's petition is moot.N Cherry Hill, the community with which the system principally identifies itself, is  xlocated immediately across the Delaware River from the City of Philadelphia. WFMZTV,  xlicensed to Allentown, Pennsylvania began operation in 1976 and broadcasts on channel 69 from  x/a transmitter located in Allentown. The cable communities are approximately 47 to 75 miles from the station.  X - xA. Historic Signal Carriage  X -  X- ` 2x17.` ` Statutory factor one is "whether the station, or other stations located in the same  xarea, have been historically carried on the cable system or systems within such community."  xWFMZTV has no history of carriage in the cable communities in question. Nor are other  X!- xKstations carried from the same general area (Allentown) to which this station is licensed. WFMZTV is not a station of recent origin, having commenced operations more than 20 years ago."" ,N(N(ZZ!"Ԍ X- ` ԙx18.` ` Carriage on nearby cable systems is not a factor specified in the statute, but it does  xseem likely, depending on the specific circumstances involved, that carriage on nearby systems  X- xjcould serve as evidence to define the logical scope of a station's market.s 18 {OK-ԍ Fouce Amusement Enterprises, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 668, 671 (CSB, 1995).s Such carriage could  xserve to demonstrate the belief of both the stations and systems involved that there is a market  X- xnexus between the broadcast station and the communities where the station is carried and thus  xprovide evidence as to the scope of a station's market. The signal of WFMZTV is carried in  xthe City of Philadelphia and in Trenton. Cherry Hill and the surrounding cable communities are immediately adjacent to Philadelphia.  X1-x B. Station Coverage of Communities  X -  X - ` _x19.` ` Statutory factor two is "whether the television station provides coverage or other  xlocal service to such community." This factor incorporates both technical service and  xprogramming service. With respect to technical service coverage, the Commission has stated in  X - xiits Report and Order in MM Docket No. 92259 that "to show that the station provides coverage  xyor other local service to the cable communities, parties may demonstrate that the station places  xat least a Grade B coverage contour over the cable community or is located close to the  X{- xcommunity in terms of mileage."A {Z18 yO-ԍ 8 FCC Rcd at 29762977.A WFMZTV does not provide Grade B service to the cable  xcommunities. An application is pending, however, that will extend the station's Grade B service  x=area so that portions of Burlington and Camden Counties in which the system operates will be within or on the fringe of the contour.  X- ` x20.` ` With respect to programming service, Garden State alleges that there is no  x\significant amount of programming from the station that is specifically targeted to the cable  xcommunities involved. There is evidence from the station, however, that its broadcasts material  X- xdirected toward New Jersey viewers, including stories specific to Burlington, Camden and Gloucester Counties.  X~-  Mx C. Coverage of News, Sporting Events, or Other Events of Interest by Other  Xg-Stations Entitled to Carriage  X9- ` nx21.` ` Statutory factor three is "whether any other television station that is eligible to be  xcarried by a cable system in such community in fulfillment of the requirements of this section  xprovides news coverage of issues of concern to such community or provides carriage or coverage  xof sporting and other events of interest to the community." In this instance Garden State alleges  xLthat it provides carriage to numerous Pennsylvania and New Jersey stations that provide local  xyservice to its subscribers. These include KYWTV, WPVITV, WCAUTV, WPHLTV, WTXF x.TV, WYBE, and WGBSTV from Philadelphia; WGTW from Burlington; WHSP from Vineland;"! ,N(N(ZZ "  xand WNJS from Camden. Maranatha argues that some of these stations carry no news at all and disputes the significance of the coverage by the other stations.  X- xD. Station Audience in Communities Served by Cable System  X- ` x22.` ` Statutory factor four is "evidence of viewing patterns in cable and noncable  xhouseholds within the areas served by the cable system or systems in such community."  xAlthough Maranatha challenges the quality of the evidence provided by Garden State as to the  xKviewing it receives in the cable communities, there does not appear to be any serious dispute that  x=the station has no significant audience in the cable communities, either in cable or in noncable  xhouseholds. Nielsen data for the counties reflect no viewing of WFMZTV which is entirely  X - xconsistent with the lack of Grade B service to the communities. We note, however, that this  x<evidence must be considered in light of the existing lack of carriage and the heavily cabled nature  X -of the communities (80 to 90 percent). 18 {ON- xZԍ See The Chronicle Publishing Company d/b/a Ventura County Cablevision, 10 FCC Rcd 9474, 94819482 (1995).  X -x E. Other Considerations  Xy- ` $x23.` ` The factors specified in 614(h) do not purport to be exclusive and thus other  xLevidence may be considered that is helpful in defining the scope of the markets of the stations  xinvolved. One such additional factor involves whether local newspaper or other listings of station  xkprogramming that have circulation in the cable communities include the programming of the  x=stations in question. WFMZTV is said to be now listed in the channel reference pages of the  X- xPhiladelphia metropolitan edition of TV Guide with a full program listing scheduled to commence in June of 1997.  X-x F. Summary  X- ` "x24.` ` The cable television mandatory broadcast signal carriage rules were adopted as part  xof the 1992 Cable Act. According to the legislative history of that Act, the use of ADI market  xareas is intended "to ensure that television stations be carried in the areas which they serve and  XP- xwhich form their economic market."\P"18 yO# -ԍ H.R. Rep. 102628, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 97 (1992).\ The Act specifically provided that the Commission was  x{to consider adding additional communities or excluding communities from the markets of  X"- xtelevision stations "to better effectuate the purposes" of the mandatory carriage requirements.?"18 yO#-ԍ 47 U.S.C. 534(h).?  xIn acting on such requests the Commission was instructed to "afford particular attention to the  xvalue of localism, taking into account four specified statutory factors." These factors, however," B,N(N(ZZ<"  X- x.were "not intended to be exclusive."\18 yOy-ԍ H.R. Rep. 102628, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 97 (1992).\ The market modification provisions of 614(h) are said,  x>in the legislative history, to "reflect a recognition that the Commission may conclude that a  xcommunity within a station's ADI may be so far removed from the station that it cannot be  X- xdeemed part of the station's market."3X18 {O-ԍ Id.3 We do not believe that the requested exclusion of the  xycommunities served by Garden State's cable systems from the markets of WFMZTV will better effectuate the purposes of the mustcarry statutory provisions.  X_- ` x25.` ` In reaching this conclusion, we have considered the statutory factors as well as  xother relevant information. WFMZTV has never been carried in the communities in question  x<(factor I), provides no overtheair television broadcast service to the communities (factor II), and  X - xzhas no measured audience in the communities (factor IV). Other stations that are entitled to  xcarriage do provide news and other information regarding issues of concern to the communities  x.(factor III). Given the statutory directive, weight must be given to these factors, but that must  xbe done bearing in mind that the objective of the 614(h) process is to "better effectuate the  xpurposes" of the broadcast signal carriage scheme. Thus, with respect to the question of historical  xcarriage patterns, attention must be paid to the circumstances from which such patterns developed.  x.Some stations have not had the opportunity to build a record of historical carriage for specific  Xy- xLreasons that do not necessarily reflect a judgment as to the geography of the market involved .  xLThus, these factors to the extent they are reflective of circumstances outside of the shape of  xythe market are not by themselves controlling in circumstances where such an implementation  xof the 1992 Cable Act would, in effect, prevent weaker stations like WFMZTV, that cable systems had previously declined to carry, from ever obtaining carriage rights.  X- ` x26.` ` Another factor to consider is the availability of other broadcasters in the market  x=that are eligible for carriage and provide coverage of news, sporting events, or other events of  xinterest to the communities at issue. We have stated, however, that where a cable operator is  xseeking to delete a station's mandatory carriage rights in certain communities within its ADI and  x[it is clear that the station is not providing local service to those communities, the issue of local  xjcoverage by other stations becomes a factor to which we will give greater weight than in cases  Xe- xLwhere a party is seeking to add communities.te18 {O -ԍ Nationwide Communications, Inc. 10 FCC Rcd 13050, 13053 n.22 (1995).t Carriage of other local stations may be used as  xan enhancement factor to support a cable operator's deletion request when there is other evidence  X7- xLin the record that the communities at issue are outside of the station's market.7|18 {Od#-ԍ TCI of Illinois, DA 971002, para. 26, 1997 WL 241995 (F.C.C.) (CSB released May 12, 1997). In the present  x[case, Garden State carries numerous other stations licensed to communities in the Philadelphia  xADI that are closer to the cable communities and provide coverage of local news and events. There is, however, also evidence of WFMZTV's service to the cable communities. " ,N(N(ZZ;"Ԍ X- ` x27.` ` Given the difficulties of relying exclusively and explicitly on the statutory factors  X- xof historical carriage and viewing patterns, which could severely narrow the carriage rights of  xstations even within what is undeniably their local market area, we have found it necessary to  xfocus more heavily on factors that are not influenced by the type or age of the stations involved  X- xor historical carriage.l18 {O-ԍ See Cablevision Systems Corp., 11 FCC Rcd 6453, 6474 (1996).l The scope of a local station's market may be measured through  xgeographic means by examining the distance between the station and the cable community subject  xto the deletion request and by taking into account natural phenomena such as waterways,  X_- x<mountains, and valleys that may tend to separate communities and define natural markets basic  xgeographic, demographic, and political features that provide the best available alternative evidence  xjof the market boundaries of the stations involved. In this regard the Commission has explicitly  X - xnoted the relevance of Grade B contours.k Z18 yO% - x-ԍ As a general matter, Grade B coverage demonstrates service to cable communities and serves as a measure  {O - xof a station's natural economic market. See Report and Order in MM Docket No. 92259, 8 FCC Rcd at 2977. See  {O- xalso Amendment of Section 76.51 (OrlandoDaytona Beach, Melbourne, and Cocoa, Florida), 102 FCC 2d 1062,  x1070 (1984)("We believe that television stations actually do or logically can rely on the area within their Grade B contours for economic support.").k In the absence of other information, station service  xcontours provide at least one objective measure of the scope of a stations local market. Here we  X - x[note that WFMZTV does not presently provide Grade B service to the cable communities but  xis in the process of improving its facilities so that they will be on the edge of or somewhat  xbeyond its service area. The station is also geographically separated from Burlington and  xzGloucester Counties in terms of mileage by approximately 47 to 75 miles, is on the far side of the Delaware River from the cable communities, and is in a different state.  Xb- ` _x28.` ` Weighing against the grant of the petition is evidence relating to cable carriage in  xother adjoining communities and the fact that station has demonstrated some efforts to provide  xprogramming targeted to New Jersey, including Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester. These two  xfactors are of significant importance in our analysis of this petition and persuade us, along with  xthe other facts as to the station's broadcast service area and the distances and geography involved  x{that exclusion of these communities from the market of WFMZTV is not warranted. We  xrecognize that a number of the other factors weigh in Garden State's favor, including in particular  xthe absence of any historical carriage in the areas in question after many years of operation. The  xstation's facilities were improved in 1993 and a further improvement has been applied for, so that  xMthe lack of historical carriage is based circumstances that no longer exist. The listing of the  xxstation and its schedule in TV listings relevant to these communities also provides some evidence  xthat the market regards this area to be within the economic market and service area of the station.  xyThe distances and geography involved are not so extreme in terms of the core area of the cable  xsystem as to suggest no market nexus with the communities exists. Most of the communities in  xquestion are clustered together just across the Delaware River from Philadelphia, and along the  xjriver to the northeast. While some of the cable communities are considerably more distant, the  x[information provided by Garden State is not adequate to permit distinctions to be made among the 58 individual communities involved." ,N(N(ZZ"Ԍ X- ` Qԙx29.` ` We have carefully considered each statutory and other relevant factors in the  X- xcontext of the circumstances presented here and, on balance,c18 yOb- xZԍ We are under no obligation to give particular weight to any particular one of the several statutory factors.  {O*- xSee Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 151, 175 (D.C. Cir. 1995); accord, Omnipoint Corp. v. FCC,  x78 F.3d 620, 633634 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (When Congress directs an agency to consider certain factors, the agency  xisimply "must reach an express and considered conclusion about the bearing of a factor, but is not required to give any specific weight to it.").c we find that Garden State has not  x[demonstrated that the communities it serves lack a sufficient nexus with WFMZTV to warrant deletion of these communities from the station's ADI.  X- ` x30.` ` Turning to Maranatha's signal carriage complaint, having found that grant of  xkGarden State's petition for market modification is not warranted, we find no issue remaining.  xGarden State has conceded that WFMZTV's signal is of sufficient strength if the proper  xreceiving antenna is used, and Maranatha has committed to supplying at its own expense the  xLnecessary equipment to deliver a good quality signal to Garden State's principal headend. We  x[find, therefore, that WFMZTV is a qualified UHF station entitled to carriage on Garden State's systems serving the communities in question.  X -  ORDERING CLAUSES ĐTP  X - ` 2x31.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED , that the petition for special relief (CSR4932A)  X-filed January 16, 1997 by Garden State Cablevision, L.P. IS DENIED .  Xb- ` x32.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED , that the "Complaint" (CSR4882M) filed  XK- xyNovember 27, 1996 by Maranatha Broadcasting Company, Inc., IS GRANTED , in accordance  x=with 614(d)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. 534) and 47 C.F.R. 76.56(b).  X- ` #x33.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED , that the affected cable systems shall commence  xzcarriage of WFMZTV sixty (60) days from the date that WFMZTV provides the necessary  xyspecialized equipment to receive a good quality signal at the principal headend of Garden State Cablevision, L.P.  X|- ` x34.` ` This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by 0.321 of the Commission's Rules. x` `  hh@FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hh@William H. Johnson x` `  hh@Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau" z,N(N(ZZ"  X-0 APPENDIX ĐTP  X-County` `  Communities  X-  p'Burlington` `  Chesterfield Township, Eastampton Township, Evesham Township,   pbx` `  Fieldsboro Borough, Florence Township, Fort Dix, Hainesport Borough,   p6x` `  Lumberton Borough, Mansfield Township, McGuire Air Force Base,   px` `  Medford Lakes Borough, Medford Township, Moorestown Township,   px` `  Mount Holly Township, Mount Laurel Township, New Hanover   px` `  Township, North Hanover Township, Pemberton Borough, Pemberton   prx` `  Township, Shamong Township, Southampton Township, Springfield   px` `  Township, Tabernacle Township, Westampton Township, Woodland x` `  Township, Wrightstown Borough  X -  pCamden` `  Audubon Borough, Audubon Park Borough, Barrington Borough,   px` `  Bellmawr Borough, Berlin Borough, Berlin Township, Camden City,   px` `  Cherry Hill Township, Clementon Borough, Collingswood Borough,   px` `  Gibbsboro Borough, Gloucester Township, Haddon Township,   p6x` `  Haddonfield Borough, Haddon Heights Borough, HiNella Borough,   px` `  Laurel Springs Borough, Lawnside Borough, Lindenwold Borough,   p8x` `  Magnolia Borough, Merchantville Borough, Oaklyn Borough,   p(x` `  Pennsauken Township, Pine Hill Borough, Runnemede Borough,   p x` `  Somerdale Borough, Startford Borough, Voorhees Township, x` `  Woodlynne Borough  X-Gloucester` `  Pitman Borough  X-  X-Ocean[18 {O -ԍ In New York ADI. See note 11, supra.[` `  Plumsted Township  Xe-Salemx` `  Carneys Point Township