WPC)! 2MB%RK Z3|X Times New RomanTimes New Roman Bold P6G;P"i~'^09CSS999S]+9+/SSSSSSSSSS//]]]Ixnnxg]xx9?xgxx]xn]gxxxxg9/9MS9ISISI9SS//S/SSSS9?/SSxSSIP!PZ9+ZM999+99999999S/xIxIxIxIxIlnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/xSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxIxSxRxSxSxS]SxIxIxInInInZnIxigIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999Su]ZZxSg/gCg9g9g/xSbxSxSxSxSxn9n9n9]?]?]?]ZgFg/gMxSxSxSxSxSxSxxZgIgIgIxSg9xS]?g9xSi+SS88WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN/>/>/>/x]SSSSx]x]x]x]xSxSx]SSxSxSf]xSxSxSxIxIxWxIx{nInInInISSSWS]a?/?]?9?]]WW]n/nKn9nCn/x]xx]x]SSxxIxIxI]?]?]?]WnUn9nax]x]x]x]x]x]xxWnInInIx]n9x]]?n9xSz+SS8-8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN(-((((((((((---#J:55:2-:::2F::-:5-2::K::2%(#(#(#(((>((((((:((#&&++%(:#:#:#:#:#F45#2#2#2#2#:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:#:(:':(:(:(-(:#:#:#5#5#5+5#:22#2#2#2#:(:(:(:+:(:+:(((8-++:(22 222:(/:(:(:(:(F:555----+2"22%:(:(:(:(:(:(K::+2#2#2#:(2:(-2:(2((W888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxN00%(#((((M(==(==(=##(P0P((N1=PP00/CC--P#(CP"5555==JPP(=P0.+(-N00P(y.X80,X\  P6G;P7jC:,9Xj\  P6G;XP7nC:,|Xn4  pG;Xy.\80,T\4  pG;W!@(#,h@\  P6G;hPa$G,',G\  P6G;P:*,*\  P6G;P\{,W80,%0W*f9 xr G;X 2K\'!"i~'^09FSS999Sq+9+/SSSSSSSSSS99qqqSggnxggxx9In]nxgxgS]xgg]]?/?FS9SSISI/SS//I/xSSSS??/SInII?C/CZ9+ZF999+999999S9S/gSgSgSgSgSnnIgIgIgIgI9/9/9/9/nSxSxSxSxSxSxSxSxS]IgSxSxSxS]IxSgSgSgSgSnInInZnIxdgIgIgIgIxSxSxSxZxSxZxS9/9S999SSZZnI]/]<]9]5]/nSanSnSxSxSng?g?g?S?S?S?ZZ]<]/]FxSxSxSxSxSxSn]Z]?]?]?xS]9nSS?]9]Sd+SS8%8WuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddNand 47 C.F.R.  76.1002(e). In the alternative, OpTel claimed that Continental unreasonably  x.refused to sell programming to OpTel in violation of 47 U.S.C.  548(c)(2)(B). Continental filed  Xh-an Answer and OpTel filed a Reply.h yO-ЍIn addition, Continental filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response.  X:- ` 2x2. ` ` Optel and Continental, through their attorneys, have filed a request for dismissal,  xfashioned as a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal ("Joint Stipulation"), in which they request that we  xdismiss OpTel's Complaint with prejudice and without costs. According to the parties, on  x/January 31, 1997, Continental waived its exclusive right to Prime Ticket's programming with  xrespect to all other multichannel video programming distributors, including, but not limited to, OpTel.  X- ` x3. ` ` The Commission encourages resolution of program access disputes through  xnegotiations between the parties in an effort to avoid timeconsuming, complex adjudication.  xSuch a policy favoring private settlement and alternative dispute resolution conserves Commission  XT"-resources and is thus in the public interest.y\T"X {O]&- xԍSee Implementation of Sections 12 and 19 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act  x,of 1992Development of Competition and Diversity in Video Programming Distribution and Carriage, Report and  {O'-Order in MM Docket No. 92265, 8 FCC Rcd 3359, 3389, 3416 (1993).y "=#|,))ZZG""Ԍ X- ` Ax4. ` ` We thus find that it is in the public interest to terminate this proceeding pursuant to the Joint Stipulation submitted by the parties.  X- ` Px5. ` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint of OpTel, Inc. against American  x>Cablesystems of California, Inc., d/b/a Continental Cablevision, Inc., IS DISMISSED WITH  xPREJUDICE. This action is taken by the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to authority  Xv-delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules.pp  e"WF  x` `  hh@FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION   x` `  hh@Meredith J. Jones x` `  hh@Chief, Cable Services Bureau