WPCl 2M BR Z h Times Roman3|w s BoldXw PE37XPHP4M (PCL); Rm. 505; LPT2tional)HL4MPCAD.PRSXw PE37\U xXP|D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd; Rm. 505; LPT2tional)HL4MPCAD.PRSXj\  P6G;\U xXP2 ' 3|w CG TimesCG Times BoldTimes New RomanLA4MP0.PRSXw PE37\5{XXP2s/f 1f vh",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d<|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCzCddoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L",tB^ f ^ENluuNNNuNNNNuuuuuuuuuuNNhN[}NNNuuNhuhuhNuuAAuAuuuuV[Auuuuhhuhu=uuuuuNuuuuuuuuuAhhhhhhhhhhNANANANAuuuuuuuuuuhuuuuuuguggguuguuguuuuuuuNAuuuuNuuuuATuFAuuuuuTTu~Y~Y~Y}uTAuuuuuuuuggguuu}uuuNuuNNNWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNuuuNh__uuuuuuRuuuuRNNyyu<<uuuuuNyuR"uyuCuNNNuuuuNuhulcuhhNNNNh[huhNAhhuhuuuhhNuhNNuuuuuuuNuhN /;k  PP9~~+k~~KkKk&&pYa8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` 2pkka4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  2vt8 Fa7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` 2"   n! #"a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h 2&##$%a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technical2C)&'((a1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   2 ,u)**+a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . 2^2<,3,-e1a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx&-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Pub. L. No. 102385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992); 47 U.S.C.  534, 534(i)("1992 Cable  Y('-Act"). The 1992 Cable Act, amends Part 6 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  521 et seq.| and the Commission's rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission""0*0*0*F#" must review a cable operator's rates for its CPS tier upon the filing of a valid complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a  Y-justification of its CPS rates.Df Yy-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.956. Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its rates through a benchmark showing, a costofservice showing, or a small system cost of service  Y-showing.zDf Y-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.956(b) and  76.934(h). In any case, the operator has the burden of demonstrating that its CPS rates are  Y-not unreasonable.zDf Y-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Id.Ĩ  Yv-x3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993.^vDf Y -#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation Order, MM Docket No. 92266, 58 Fed. Reg. 41042 (Aug. 2, 1993).^  Y_-The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994.__c Df Ys-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, MM Docket No. 92266, Second Order on Reconsideration Fourth  YG-Report and Order and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 9 FCC Rcd 4119 (#Xu&_ x7QXX#"Second  Y2-Order on Reconsideration"#Xw PE37XP#); 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)._ In a further effort to offer small cable companies administrative relief from rate regulation, the Commission amended the definition of small cable companies and small systems and  Y -introduced a simplified form of small system rate relief in the Small System Order. Cable systems serving 15,000 or fewer subscribers, and owned by a company having 400,000 or fewer subscribers, may elect to use the new small cable system rate mechanism in lieu of other Commission rate processes, provided the Commission has not reached a final resolution on the rate complaint[s] filed against the system. Operators attempting to justify their rates through small system relief must file FCC Form 1230. If the maximum rate established on  Y-Form 1230 does not exceed $1.24 per channel, the rate shall be presumed reasonable. Df Y-#XP\  P6Q9XP##XP\  P6Q9XP#э#Xw PE37XP# See Small System Order 10 FCC Rcd at 7428.  Yd-    x4. We find that Apollo is a company with fewer than 400,000 total subscribers and that the system in question serves fewer than 15,000 subscribers, making it eligible for small system relief. Apollo's CPS rate is less than $1.24 per channel and, therefore, is presumed  Y-reasonable. Df YX$-ԍ This finding is based solely on the representations of the operator. Should information come to our attention that these representations were materially inaccurate, we reserve the right to take appropriate action. This Order is not to be construed as a finding that we have accepted as correct any specific entry, explanation or argument made by any party to this proceeding not specifically addressed herein. There is nothing in the pleading that refutes this presumption; therefore, we find the rate to be not unreasonable." 0*0*0* "Ԍ Y-ԙ x5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that Apollo Cablevision, Inc.'s request for small system relief is GRANTED.  Y- 3'3'Standard3'3'Standardal)HL4MPCAD.PRSXwhڰ x x6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the CPS rate charged by Apollo Cablevision, Inc. with respect to the abovereferenced CUID number, IS JUSTIFIED. x` ` x7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaints against the CPS rate charged by Apollo Cablevision, Inc. with respect to the abovereferenced CUID number, ARE DENIED. x` `  hh x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hh x` `  hh x` `  hhJoAnn Lucanik x` `  hhChief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division  Y-x` `  hhCable Services Bureau    aK<# PE37mRP# #_ pi7-#