NOTICE


*************************************************************************
             

                         NOTICE


*************************************************************************

This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect.  

If the original document contained--

                    *  Footnotes
                    *  Boldface & Italics

--this information  is missing in this version

The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too.

If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version.

For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file pnmc5021.

File  pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous.

*************************************************************************
                                Before the
                     Federal Communications Commission
                          Washington, D.C. 20554



     
In the Matter of)
     )
Cable Video Enterprises, Inc.    )     CUID Nos.  OK0095 (Wilson)
d/b/a Anadarko Cable TV          )     OK0114 (Anadarko)
     )
Order Denying Jurisdiction       )
                                     


                                  ORDER

   Adopted:  September 11, 1996               Released:  September 12, 1996 

By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau:

 1.   In this Order we dismiss complaints against the rates that the above captioned
operator Cable Video Enterprises, Inc. ("Cable Video Enterprises") was charging for its cable
programming services tier ("CPST") in the communities set forth above on the grounds that the
complaints concern rates that are outside the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications
Commission ("Commission").  Under the Communications Act, the Commission regulates the
CPST rates of cable systems not subject to effective competition upon the filing of a valid
complaint.  Our review reveals that the complaints filed against Cable Video Enterprises while
asserting that they challenge a CPST rate, challenges only a rate for the basic service tier, and
not a CPST rate.  Consequently, the complaints do not trigger the Commission's jurisdiction.

 2.     Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 543(a)(2)(A) and (B), the
complaints against the CPST rates charged by Cable Video Enterprises in the communities
referenced above ARE DISMISSED.
 3.     This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321of the
Commission's Rules 47 C.F.R.  0.321.

 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



 Elizabeth W. Beaty
 Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division
 Cable Services Bureau