NOTICE ************************************************************************* NOTICE ************************************************************************* This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect. If the original document contained-- * Footnotes * Boldface & Italics --this information is missing in this version The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too. If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version. For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file pnmc5021. File pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous. ************************************************************************* Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re: ) ) Complaint of University Broadcasting Company ) CSR-4709-M against Quality Cablevision of Oklahoma, Inc. ) ) Request for Carriage ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 10, 1996 Released: July 18, 1996 By the Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. On April 8, 1996, University Broadcasting Company, licensee of Station KWMJ (Channel 53), Tulsa, Oklahoma, filed a "Complaint" with the Commission, pursuant to 76.61 of the Commission's Rules, claiming that, despite repeated requests, Quality Cablevision of Oklahoma, Inc. ("Quality"), operator of cable systems serving the Oklahoma communities of Hectorville and Preston, both in Okmulgee County, Talala, in Rogers County, Strang, in Mayes County, and Pittsburgh, in Pittsburgh County, has refused to carry KWMJ, even though the station and each of Quality's systems is located in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area of dominant influence (or "ADI"). This complaint is unopposed. SUMMARY OF THE PLEADING 2. According to KWMJ, it advised Quality by letter dated January 10, 1996, that it was electing must-carry status, rather than retransmission consent, and that it would begin operations on January 24, 1996. Since it received no response, KWMJ sent Quality another letter dated January 30, 1996, stating that it had, in fact, commenced operations on January 24, 1996 and requesting carriage by the systems. Again Quality did not respond, so KWMJ sent it a third letter dated February 9, 1996, asking that these systems comply with the Commission's mandatory carriage rules and providing names of station personnel who might assist in evaluating KWMJ's signal. However, Quality has neither responded to any of these letters, nor added the station. When KWMJ's engineer contacted Quality on March 6, 1996, he was told that it was evaluating KWMJ's election. DISCUSSION 3. According to 76.55(e) of the Commission's Rules, the market of a commercial television broadcast station, such as KWMJ, is defined as its Area of Dominant Influence (or "ADI"). A commercial station is entitled to request carriage on any cable system operating in that ADI. 47 C.F.R. 76.56(b). KWMJ made its carriage request by letter dated January 30, 1996. Quality failed to respond to KWMJ within the thirty days allowed by 76.61(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules. Subsequently, KWMJ filed a complaint within sixty days thereafter, as provided by 76.7(c)(4)(iii)(B) of the Commission's Rules. KWMJ is currently in the Tulsa, Oklahoma ADI, which is also where Mayes, Rogers, Pittsburgh, and Okmulgee Counties are located. Therefore, KWMJ is entitled to mandatory carriage on the cable systems serving Strang, Talala, Pittsburgh, Preston, and Hectorville, since they are each located in one of these four Counties. ORDERING CLAUSES 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the "Complaint" (CSR-4709-M), filed April 8, 1996, by University Broadcasting Company, licensee of Television Broadcast Station KWMJ (Ind., Channel 53), Tulsa, Oklahoma, IS GRANTED in accordance with 614 (d)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. 534) and 47 C.F.R. 76.56(b). 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that KWMJ shall notify the relevant cable systems in writing of its channel position election (76.57 of the Commission's Rules), within thirty (30) days of the release date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the affected cable systems shall come into compliance with the applicable rules within sixty (60) days of such notification. 7. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by 0.321 of the Commission's Rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gary M. Laden Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division Cable Services Bureau