WPC 2MBERK Z3|w Y-#Xw PE37><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx3!l3"l4#x{4footnote referencefootnote reference Default Paragraph FoDefault Paragraph Font! Document 8Document 8" Document 4Document 4#  26$l%5%l5&l5'li6Document 6Document 6$ Document 5Document 5% Document 2Document 2& Document 7Document 7' 2=(7)%9*lC;+;Right Par 1Right Par 1(` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 2Right Par 2)` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Document 3Document 3* Right Par 3Right Par 3+` hp x (#X` P hp x (#X` P hp x (#` hp x (#2wF,=-@.;B/YDRight Par 4Right Par 4,` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 5Right Par 5-` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Right Par 6Right Par 6.` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Right Par 7Right Par 7/` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#27O0F1(H2$J3$MRight Par 8Right Par 80` hp x (#X` hp x (#0X` hp x (#0` hp x (#Document 1Document 11` hp x (#X` hp x (#X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 5Technical 52` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 6Technical 63` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#2R4liO5lO6$AP7leRTechnical 2Technical 24 Technical 3Technical 35 Technical 4Technical 46` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 1Technical 17 2[8$S9$'U:KW;iYTechnical 7Technical 78` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#Technical 8Technical 89` hp x (#X` hp x (# X` hp x (#` hp x (#toc 1toc 1:` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#toc 2toc 2;` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#21d<[=]>_?btoc 3toc 3<` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#toc 4toc 4=` hp x (# !(#  !(# ` hp x (#toc 5toc 5>` hp x (#h!(# h!(# ` hp x (#toc 6toc 6?` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#23k@vcdAdBfCitoc 7toc 7@ toc 8toc 8A` hp x (#!(#!(#` hp x (#toc 9toc 9B` hp x (#!(#B!(#B` hp x (#index 1index 1C` hp x (#` !(# ` !(# ` hp x (#2pDekEmFvoGlpindex 2index 2D` hp x (#` !(#B` !(#B` hp x (#toatoaE` hp x (#!(# !(# ` hp x (#captioncaptionF _Equation Caption_Equation CaptionG 2rHrpI'qJ}qK#rendnote referenceendnote referenceH head1 #I'd#2p}wC@ #a1Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfJ$ a2Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfK/` ` ` 2kuLrMpsNtOta3Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfL:` ` `  a4Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfME` ` `  a5Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfNP  ` ` ` hhh a6Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfO[   2PuQ\vf &wf a7Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfPf  a8Paragraph R!1. a. i. (1) (a) (i) 1) a)D )DDDFrfQq ",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxN`xoCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddd4dddddCddddddddo8dddddYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddpddddxodddXXddXddXdddddooL8doddNorddo8PdN8ppoddXXdpLoNpLodPDdopoopodXYXodoodddCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"dsd9dCCzCddoddCdYds`zUvdddCCCCzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L",tB^ f ^;C`ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxxxsCYoxxdoxxooCCCddCddYdY8dd88Y8ddddLL8dYYYLYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8xdxdxdxdxdYxYxYxYxYC8C8C8C8dddddddddoYxddddoYdxdxdxdxdXXddxxXxdxdxXdddddddD8ddddCdddddp8pHodp8p8dxddddxLxLxddLdLdLddpHp8odddddddodpLpLpLdoddddododxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCd]]ddddddFddddFCCddd88ddzzdddkddCddF"ddd9dCCzCdzdoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCzzzozoYzNoYdYC8YooYdYzzdzddoYoYzzozzzzzCdoozYzzzzCCddddzdddooozCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L2Z$~7jC:,Xj\  P6G;XP8wC;, z$ > r >  T > D z D \r \ >z 6 X-  ЊX01Í ÍX01Í Í  gH  $//ORDER, COMCAST CABLEVISION OF TALLAHASSEE, INC., DA 952305/$ $/76.922 Rates for the basic service tier/$ $/76.923 Rates for equipment and installation/$  Y-$/76.944 Commission Review of Franchising Authority Decisions/$ `(#(#X gH ԃ X-T T 2(Before the W FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  XI-Washington, D.C. 20554 TP  Y -In the Matter of:R) ă R)  Y -COMCAST CABLEVISION OF R)hpp DA 952305 TALLAHASSEE, INC.R) R) R) Application for Review of R) Memorandum Opinion and OrderR) of the Cable Services Bureau (DA 951561)R)  YM-  Y-}  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ă  Y- Adopted :` ` November 6, 1995hh@h ppReleased :  November 15, 1995 By the Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable Services Bureau:  X- I.xINTRODUCTION  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)  Yi-x1.` ` On September 15, 1995, Comcast Cablevision of Tallahassee, Inc. ("Comcast") filed with the Commission an Application for Review of a Memorandum  Y;-Opinion and Order released by the Cable Services Bureau on July 17, 1995.;s Y-ԍxIn the Matter of Comcast Cablevision of Tallahassee, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 7686 (Cab. Serv. Bur., released July 17, 1995). In addition, an Application for Review was filed by the City of Tallahassee ("City") on September 15, 1995.  Y-x2.` ` On September 21, 1995, the City filed a Motion to Strike Comcast's Application for Review ("Motion to Strike") based on the fact that the text of the Application  Y -for Review was in excess of the Commission's 25page limit.f ds Y%-ԍxSee 47 C.F.R.  1.48(a) and 1.115(f)(1).f On October 2, 1995, Comcast filed a Motion to Substitute Application for Review of Memorandum Opinion and"!0*(("" Order ("Motion to Substitute") in which it sought to replace its Application for Review with a redacted Application for Review ("Redacted Application") which complied with the Commission's 25page limit. The City filed an opposition to Comcasts's Motion to Substitute on October 4, 1995. x  Y-x3.` ` We will grant Comcast's Motion to Substitute since its Redacted Application  Yv-raises no new issues or arguments.vs Y-ԍxSee In re Application of Communications Industries, Inc., James F. Rill, Trustee, and Pacific Telesis Group, 1986 WL 292740 (FCC) (Common Carrier Bureau, released February 20, 1986). Furthermore, the City will not be prejudiced by the substitution of Comcast's Redacted Application since its original Application for Review was  YH-timely filed and properly served upon the City.>HMs YF -ԍxSee id.> Finally, the substitution of Comcast's Redacted Application will not cause any delay in the proceedings in this matter, for the City  Y -has also filed an Application for Review, which the Commission must rule upon.> s Y-ԍxSee id.> For the foregoing reasons, we believe that the public interest in considering Comcast's Application for Review outweighs its procedural deficiencies. Accordingly, Comcast's Redacted  Y -Application for Review is hereby accepted nunc pro tunc. The City's Motion to Strike is denied. The City shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of release of this order to file an opposition to Comcast's redacted Application for Review.  X -  X-IV.xORDERING CLAUSES  Yd-x4.` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Substitute Application for Review of Memorandum Opinion and Order filed by Comcast Cablevision of Tallahassee,  Y7-Florida is GRANTED .  Y -x5` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike filed by the City of  Y-Tallahassee, Florida is DENIED . x  Y-x6.` ` This action is taken by the Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. 0.321. x` ` x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhMary Ellen Burns "0*(( "Ԍx` `  hhChief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division x` `  hhCable Services Bureau