WPCnt 2a BKf Z CG Times3|w =9Xw PE37XP",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d<|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCzCddoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`LHP4M; Local Printer; LPT1tional)HL4MPCAD.PRSXw PE37\!vXP2E  f EN Y-#Xw PE37=9XP#3|w ",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d<|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCzCddoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L c-#XR  P7jQXP#20 Zf /$f $HP4M; Local Printer; LPT1tional)HL4MPCAD.PRSx  @\!vX@",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCY~~vCN~sk~CCCddCYdYdYCdd88d8ddddJN8ddddYYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8YYYYYY~Y~Y~Y~YC8C8C8C8ddddddddddYdddddsdXdXXXddx|X~d~d|XdddddddC8ddddCdoddd|8|H~d<|8dtddddHHdlLlLlLkd|H|8~ddddddddXXXd~ddkd~ddxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCYQQddddddFddddFCChhd44ddzzdddvooChdF"dhd9dCCzCddoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCz~ozoY~NYdYC8YooYdYzsdzdd~YYzozzz~CdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`LCourierCG TimesCG Times BoldCG Times Italic",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxN`xoCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddd4dddddCddddddddo8dddddYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddpddddxodddXXddXddXdddddooL8doddNorddo8PdN8ppoddXXdpLoNpLodPDdopoopodXYXodoodddCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"dsd9dCCzCddoddCdYds`zUvdddCCCCzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L22vL0p0k21k1a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# 2c4:2v2tU33a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# 2@7 4 85 5 6a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# 2: r71889a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p 2=:;<+=Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . 2@=>9??a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   2G@YA3ACa7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:xxxxxPxxxxxxxxxCkkkkkkkkkkPCPCPCPCxxxxxxxxxxkxxxxxxjxjjjxxjxxjxxxxxxxPCxxxxPxxxxCVxHCxxxxxVVx[[[xVCxxxxxxxxjjjxxxxxxPxxPPPWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxPkbbxxxxxxTxxxxTPP||x>>xxxxxP|x!T"x}xExPPPxxxxPxkxofxkkPPPPk]kxkPCkkxkxxxkkPxkPPxxxxxxxPxkP8D%nZZB 3nMnMn..s[2:tf NT_\xef h",tB^ f ^GPoxxPPPxPPPPxxxxxxxxxxPPx]sPPPxxPxkkTxCPCxk]Pxxxkxxxx>xxxxxPxxxxxxxxCxxxxxkkkkk]C]C]C]Cxxxxxxxxxxxxxjjxxjxxjxxxxx[Cxxx]xxC`x]Cxxjjx[][x`RxxjkjxxxxPxxPPPWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNxxxPxffxxxxxxTxxxxTPPx>>xxxxxPxT"xxExPPPxxxxPxkxsfxxxPPPPk]kkk]Ckkxkxxxkk]xkPPxxxxxxxPxkP8D%nZZB 3nMnMn..s["i~'K2^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxxK,H6X@`7h@C:\JRCOLES\CABLEORG.LABEdit o Menu Item Menu &Text: Macro &Name: LastOpenedMainDictionaryPathSuppDictionaryP",tB^ f ^;C`ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxxxsCYoxxdoxxooCCCddCddYdY8dd88Y8ddddLL8dYYYLYdYd4dddddCddddddddd8xdxdxdxdxdYxYxYxYxYC8C8C8C8dddddddddoYxddddoYdxdxdxdxdXXddxxXxdxdxXdddddddD8ddddCdddddp8pHodp8p8dxddddxLxLxddLdLdLddpHp8odddddddodpLpLpLdoddddododxCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCd]]ddddddFddddFCCddd88ddzzdddkddCddF"ddd9dCCzCdzdoddCdYds]zUvdYYCCCCzzzozoYzNoYdYC8YooYdYzzdzddoYoYzzozzzzzCdoozYzzzzCCddddzdddooozCsdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L2lt g@ FOR FCC RECORD ONLY $//CCA Acquisition Corp., Western CT, MO&O, DA 951231//$ $/76.922 Rates for Cable Programming Service tiers/$ $/benchmark cable rates/$    c<- Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554  X-*DA 951231 ĐX(#P  Y{ -In the Matter of hh@) CUID Nos.: CT0037 (New Milford)  Yd -x` `  hh @) CT0038 (Bridgewater)  YM -CCA Acquisition Corporation hh@) CT0101 (Trumbull) x` `  hh@) CT0102 (Monroe) x` `  hh@) CT0103 (Newton) x` `  hh@) CT0104 (Brookfield) x` `  hh@) CT0105 (New Fairfield) x` `  hh@) CT0106 (Sherman) x` `  hh@) CT0169 (Bethlehem) x` `  hh@) CT0170 (Southbury) x` `  hh@) CT0171 (Woodbury) x` `  hh@) CT0176 (Kent) x` `  hh@) CT0177 (Washington)  YP-Benchmark Filings to Supporthh@) CT0178 (Roxbury)  Y9-Cable Programming Service Priceshh@) CT0180 (Warren) x` `  hh@  Y-}  MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ă  Y-x` ` Adopted: June 5, 1995 @hReleased: June 12, 1995 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau:  YT - I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)  x1. Here we consider complaints about the prices that the abovecaptioned operator ("Operator") was charging for its cable programming service ("CPS") tiers in the  Y&"-communities designated above.n&"^ Y$-#Xw PE37XP#э #Xw PE37XP#Crown Media, Inc. was the original operator of the cable systems referenced in this Order. The cable systems were purchased by CCA Acquisition Corporation, d/b/a Charter Communications, Inc., subsequent to the time period covered by this Order. n Operator has chosen to attempt to justify its prices through a benchmark showing on FCC Form 393. This Order addresses the reasonableness of Operator's prices only through May 14, 1994. At a later date we will issue a separate order"#K0*0*0*&%"  Y-addressing the reasonableness of the prices after that date. ^ Yy-#Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP#э#XR  P7jQXP# The findings in this Order do not in any way prejudge the reasonableness of the prices for CPS service after May 14, 1994 under our new rate regulations. However, to the extent Operator has sought to take advantage of the refund deferral period under the Second Order on Reconsideration, Fourth Report and Order, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,  Y-MM Docket No. 92266, FCC 9438, 9 FCC Rcd 4119 (1994) ("Second Order on  Y-Reconsideration"), the maximum permitted CPS prices determined herein might also apply  Y-from May 15, 1994 until the date on which Operator #XR  P7jQXP#implemented its CPS prices under the  Y<new regulations. See para. 3, infra.#x6X@`7iX@# #XR  P7jQXP#Further, to the extent that the prices as of March 31, 1994 are found to be excessive, reductions in Operator's prices for the period after May 14, 1994 may be required to reflect the fact that Operator's prices during the earlier period, which are used as the starting point to calculate its prices for the prospective period, were  Y -unreasonable. See 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(4)(C).  Y-ԙ  x2. Under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Y -#Xw PE37XP#э#XR  P7jQXP# Pub. L. No. 102385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992); Communications Act,  623(c), as  Y| -amended, 47 U.S.C.  543(c) (1993). and our rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission must review CPS prices upon the filing of a valid complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an  Y-obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPS prices.~  Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.956. Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its prices through either a benchmark showing or a  Y-costofservice showing./  Ym-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.956(b). In either case, the operator has the burden of demonstrating that its  Yv-CPS prices are not unreasonable.v Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Id.Ā  YH-x3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993.9H Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Order in MM Docket No. 92266, Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, FCC 93372, 58 Fed. Reg. 41042 (Aug. 2, 1993).9  Y1-The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994.1 Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b). Operators with valid CPS complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that its CPS prices were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that its prices were in  Y -compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward.  YM#-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# See Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4190, paras. 150152. Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing must  g@  " z 0*((y"Ԍ Y- g@ complete and file FCC Form 393.  Yy-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Id. Generally, to justify their prices for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing, operators must use the FCC Form  Y-1200 series. { Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(6); see also Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4189, n.195. x4. For each of the communities referenced in the caption, the first complete and  Y-timely complaint was served on Operator on September 7, 1993. The Commission received all of these complaints on September 3, 1993. In response to all of the complaints, Operator  Y_-filed one FCC Form 393 on November 15, 1993.   Operator also filed amended and  YH-supplemental Form 393 filings, most recently on May 16, 1995.p H Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# For example, Operator filed amended FCC Forms 393 in response to a Cable Services Bureau Order citing common deficiencies observed in benchmark filings generally. Cable Operators' Rate Justification Filings, 9 FCC Rcd 7752 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1994). p x5. Operator filed motions to dismiss complaints filed after September 3, 1993 for several of the communities referenced in this Order. Because we have accepted the complaints filed with the Commission on September 3, 1993 for all of the communities referenced in this Order, we find it unnecessary to rule on Operator's objections to all other later filed complaints for all of the communities referenced in this Order. On December 1, 1993, a complainant filed a reply to the Operator's motion to dismiss the complaints he filed for all of the communities referenced in this Order. However, the records of the  Yy-Commission and of the Operator do not show that Operator ever filed such a motion. y Y-#Xw PE37XP#э Letter from John McFerron, Director of Regulatory Compliance, Charter Communications Inc., to FCC (May 8, 1995). Accordingly, we have no basis to rule on the complainant's reply. x` `  Y4-  x6. Operator asserts that its monthly CPS tier prices are justified by its benchmark filing because its prices are less than the maximum permitted charges as calculated in the filing. Upon review of Operator's Form 393 filing, we have found that Operator has not correctly calculated its maximum permitted prices, and it is therefore appropriate to make the following adjustments to Operator's calculations in its Form 393: Xx` ` a. In a single FCC Form 393 filing, Operator improperly combined data for three separate areas in which it offered subscribers different CPS rates and different numbers of rateregulated and satellite channels. According to information supplied by Operator, subscribers in CUID Nos. CT0169, CT0170, CT0171 and CT0178 received a different CPS rate and channel lineup from subscribers in CUID Nos. CT0101, CT0102, and CT0103, and from"74 0*((L" subscribers in CUID Nos. CT0037, CT0038, CT0104, CT0105, CT0106, CT0177, CT0180, and CT0176. The instructions to Form 393 clearly state that separate community units may be combined in a single filing only if "all"  0*((" relevant factors (including program service and equipment rates, channel line Y-ups and franchise fees) are identical." Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# FCC Form #Xw PE37XP#393, p.10 n.1. Operator therefore should have  Yv-completed and filed separate Forms 393 for each of these three areas.Rvy Y -#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Despite requests from FCC staff, Operator has refused to file separate Forms 393. Response of Crown Cable to a Complaint Concerning Rates for Cable Programming Services Provided in Western Connecticut (March 23, 1995).R In its amended FCC Form 393 filing of May 16, 1995, Operator provided the necessary data to calculate separately the maximum permitted price for each of the three areas covered by this Order.  Xx` ` b. In Lines 101 and 102, Worksheet 1, Part II of its FCC Form 393, Operator did not correctly enter its monthly tier charges and number of CPS channels as of the initial date of regulation. Although Operator submitted a list of channels for each of the three areas, these lists did not correspond with the number of channels listed for each area on its September 1, 1993 rate card. Accordingly, we adjusted Worksheet 1 to reflect the tier charges and channel information shown on the September 1, 1993 rate card as submitted by Operator.  Xx` ` c. In Column G of Schedules A and C of Part III of its FCC Form 393, Operator did not report any income tax expense due to a net operating  Y-loss. Y-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Letter from John McFerron, Director of Regulatory Compliance, Charter Communications, Inc., to FCC (April 6, 1995). Operator is a Chapter C corporation and is therefore required to pay  Y-corporate income tax. Y6-#Xw PE37XP#э #Xw PE37XP#Id.Ā Therefore, Operator must complete Column G on the basis of its statutory tax rate, regardless of the rate it actually paid in any  Y-given year.I  Y"-#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# See Cable Television Rate Regulation Questions and Answers Relating to FCC Form 393, Question and Answer No. 15 (released July 30, 1993). By omitting its tax entries in Column G, an operator reduces its effective rate of return on equipment and installations and thereby could increase its CPS price. We therefore calculated Operator's federal income tax allowance on Column G of Schedules A and C on the basis of a 34% corporate tax rate. Furthermore, the Commission has stated that taxpaying"e 0*(({" business entities must grossup their tax entries in Column G of Schedules A  Y-and C (i.e., calculate the tax as a percentage of return on investment plus  Y-tax).c YM-#Xw PE37XP# #XR  P7jQXP#э First Order on Reconsideration, Second Report and Order, and Third Notice of  Y6-Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket No. 92266, FCC 93428, 9 FCC Rcd 1164, 1196 n.92 (1993) ("Our provision to grossup the return amount for income taxes applies to all tax paying business entities to the extent that it has a state or federal income tax obligation.").  Y-See also Cable Television Rate Regulation Questions and Answers Relating to FCC Form 393, Question and Answer No. 14 (released July 30, 1993) ("The federal tax expense should be calculated based upon a pretax return on investment."). In accordance with this principle, we recalculated Column G of Schedules A and C (and subsequent steps) using a grossedup federal income tax rate of 51.51% of Operator's return on investment.   Yx- Xx` ` d. In Line 103, Worksheet 1, Part II of its FCC Form 393, Operator did not correctly enter its number of CPS subscribers. Accordingly, we adjusted Worksheet 1 to reflect Operator's CPS subscriber information for each of the three areas as submitted by Operator on Exhibit E, page 1 of its amended FCC Form 393 filing.   Y - Xx X` `  x`  Y - Xx` ` e. In Line 103, Worksheet 1, Part II of its FCC Form 393, Operator did not correctly enter its number of basic subscribers. Accordingly, we adjusted Worksheet 1 to reflect Operator's basic subscriber information for each of the three areas as submitted by Operator on page 4 of its April 27, 1995 letter.  Xx` ` f. In Line 33, Step G, Part III of its FCC Form 393, Operator did not adjust its annual customer equipment and installation costs to reflect the three separate areas. Accordingly, we adjusted Line 33 (and subsequent steps) in accordance with each area's percentage of subscribers as submitted by Operator on Exhibit E, page 1 of its amended FCC Form 393 filing.   Y-  x7. Upon review of the record herein, and having incorporated the adjustments discussed above, we conclude that Operator has failed to justify the rates it was charging during the period in question. Operator's showing justifies the maximum reasonable CPS tier prices shown on Appendix A (plus franchise fee) for the period from September 3, 1993  Y~-to May 14, 1994.~ Y"#<#Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##x6X@`7iX@#э#Xw PE37XP##XR  P7jQXP# This finding is based solely on the representations of Operator and the modifications described herein. Should information come to our attention that these  Y$-representations were materially inaccurate, we reserve the right to take appropriate action. This Order is not to be construed as a finding that we have accepted as correct any specific entry, explanation or argument made by any party to this proceeding not specifically"&0*((&"  Y-addressed herein. "~y0*((O"Ԍx8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaints referenced herein against the cable programming service prices charged by Operator in the areas referenced in the caption and at Appendix A, and all other complaints in these areas related to the same prices, ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. x x9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.961 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.961, that Operator shall refund to subscribers in the communities addressed herein that portion of the amounts paid for cable programming service for the  Y1-period from September 3, 1993 1y Y[ -#Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# Our jurisdiction to order a refund dates from the earliest date a valid complaint is filed with the Commission. 47 C.F.R.  76.961(b). to May 14, 1994 which exceeded the maximum price for each area set forth in Appendix A (plus franchise fee) per month, plus interest to the date of the refund. x10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Operator shall promptly determine the overcharges to its CPS subscribers for the stated period, and shall within 30 days of the release of this Order file reports with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amounts so determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plans to implement the refunds within 60 days of Commission approval of those plans.T x11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 76.922(b)(4)(C) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(4)(C), that Operator shall, within 30 days of the release of this Order, revise its Form 1200 filings with respect to the areas listed herein, for the period beginning May 15, 1994, to reduce the monthly charge per tier as of March 31, 1994 for Tier 2 (Line A6b) to equal the maximum price in each area set forth in Appendix A  Y-(plus franchise fee). Y-#Xw PE37XP#э We reserve the right to make further adjustments to Operator's prices for the period after May 14, 1994, upon completion of our review of Operator's Form 1200 filings. "0*((~" x12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Operator shall place into effect, within 30 days after its submission of the revised Form 1200 filings required above, prices that reflect the reductions in the CPS rates determined in this Order. x x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhMeredith J. Jones x` `  hhChief, Cable Services Bureau " 0*((@ "   Y-, Appendix A ă  Y-T ă T  Y-CUID No.` `  Actual Rates hh@hppMaximum Permitted Rates  Yw-x` `  for CPS Tierhh@hppfor CPS Tier  YI-CT0037` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y -CT0038` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y -CT0101` `  $8.36hh@hpp$8.76  Y -CT0102` `  $8.36hh@hpp$8.76  Y-CT0103` `  $8.36hh@hpp$8.76  Yc-CT0104` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y5-CT0105` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y-CT0106` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y-CT0169` `  $15.44hh@hpp$10.57  Y-CT0170` `  $15.44hh@hpp$10.57  Y}-CT0171` `  $15.44hh@hpp$10.57  YO-CT0176` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y!-CT0177` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24  Y-CT0178` `  $15.44hh@hpp$10.57  Y -CT0180` `  $12.22hh@hpp$11.24 T  Y (-