NOTICE ********************************************************* NOTICE ********************************************************* This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect. If the original document contained-- * Footnotes * Boldface & Italics --this information is missing in this version The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too. If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version. For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file pnmc5021. File pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous. ***************************************************************** ******** FOR FCC RECORD ONLY $//Suburban Cable TV Co., Inc., MO&O, DA 95-1186//$ $/ 76.922 Rates for the basic service tier and cable programming services tier/$ $/benchmark cable rates/$ Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 95-1186 In the Matter of ) ) Surburban Cable Television ) CUID No. PA1714 (Springfield) ) Withdrawal of FCC Form 329 ) Rate Complaint ) Memorandum Opinion and Order Adopted: May 30, 1995 Released: June 6, 1995 By the Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. On October 29, 1993, a single rate complaint was filed alleging that the price charged by Surburban Cable Television for its cable programming service ("CPS") tier in Springfield was unreasonably high. On May 16, 1995, the complainant withdrew this complaint. This complainant was the only complainant that filed a complaint with this Commission against the CPS price in Springfield. Our jurisdiction to regulate CPS rates arises with the filing of a valid complaint against those rates. We will allow the withdrawal of this complaint, and our review of this case will therefore be terminated. 2. Under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, and our rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission must review CPS prices upon the filing of a valid complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPS prices. Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its prices through either a benchmark showing or a cost-of-service showing. In either case, the operator has the burden of demonstrating that its CPS prices are not unreasonable. 3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993. The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994. Operators with valid CPS complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPS prices were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their prices were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. 4. Under our rules, this Commission's authority to regulate CPS cable rates arises when a valid complaint against those rates is filed. The sole complaint against Surburban Cable Television in this community has been withdrawn. Our mandate is to "protect subscribers of any cable system that is not subject to effective competition from rates that exceed the rates that would be charged if such a system were subject to effective competition." Because our review of the rate justification showing is predicated on the existence of a rate complaint, and because Surburban Cable Television no longer faces a rate complaint, we are terminating our review of Surburban Cable Television's filing for this community. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that permission to withdraw the FCC Form 329 rate complaint against the cable programming service rate of Surburban Cable Television in Springfield, Pennsylvania, CUID No. PA1714, IS GRANTED and our review of this case IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JoAnn Lucanik Chief, Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau