WPC&2 2BJ Z Courier3|x BoldTimes New Roman@`7X@HP LaserJet 4_230_1HPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\oeX@26F Q3|x CourierCourier Bold1HPLAS4SI.PRSx  @\iX@CourierCourier BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman BoldTimes New Roman Italic?xxx,)x `7X7jC:,Xj\  P6G;XP@|ND,C|\  P6G;Pd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd2 :'KxKv CourierCourier BoldTimes New RomanTimes New Roman Boldan ItalicCourier Bold"i~'^:DPddDDDdp4D48dddddddddd88pppX|pDL|pp||D8D\dDXdXdXDdd88d8ddddDL8ddddX`(`lD4l\DDD4DDDDDDDDd8XXXXXX|X|X|X|XD8D8D8D8ddddddddddXdbdddpdXXXXXlX~|X|X|X|XdddldldD8DdDDDdplld|8|P|D|D|8dvddddDDDpLpLpLpl|T|8|\ddddddl|X|X|Xd|DdpL|Dd~4ddC$CWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNHxxH\dDXddddd8@d<@d<DDXXdDDxddzHxxHvppDXd<"dxtldpxxd"i~'^DO]uuĶOOOu=O=AuuuuuuuuuuAAgרOYͨۨOAOkuOgugugOuuAAuAuuuuOYAuuuugp/p~O=~kOOO=OOOOOOOOuAggggg͘gggggOAOAOAOAuuuuuuuuuuguruuuuggggg~ggggguuu~u~uOAOuOOOu~~uA]OOAuuuuuͨOOOYYY~bAkuuuuuuۨ~ggguOuYOu=uuN*NWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNTTkuOguuuuuAKuFKuFOOgguPPuu叱T錌TƒOguF"u錇~u匌ua8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` 2 p k& k  a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  2 v tI  W a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` 2 ,   4a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h 2%a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technical2Ta1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   2-a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . 2o M3e a8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:R>CxxxxxxxxxxCCjݭR[ӭ⭭RCRnxRjxjxjRxxCCxCxxxxR[Cxxxxjs0sR>nRRR>RRRRRRRRxCjjjjjӜjjjjjRCRCRCRCxxxxxxxxxxjxvxxxxjjjjjjjjjjxxxxxRCRxRRRxxC`RRCxxxxxӭRRR[[[eCnxxxxxx⭭jjjxRx[Rx>xxP+PWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNVVnxRjxxxxxCMxHMxHRRjjxRRxx듶VVȆRjxH"x𐋂x됐x2d.Kr&K(K+E["i~'^FRxxRRRx>R>CxxxxxxxxxxRRx⭞[x⭻𭭞RCRxRxjjRxCRCʆxj[Rxxxj`5`}R>}RRR>RRRRRRxRCxxxxxjjjjjYCYCYCYCxxxxxxxxxxxxxjj}jjjjjxxx}x[C[[R[†}}ClR`Cxxjjj[[[}zR}jjjR[Rx>xxPAPWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNVVxRxxxxxxHRxHRxHRRxxxRRxxVVȆRxxH"x𐎂x됐x"i~'^#)0<}RRR1; Rm. 907_121\.S-Z<?xxx,2x6X@`7X@?xxx,)x `7X7jC:,Xj\  P6G;XP@|ND,C|\  P6G;P7nC:,%4Xn4  pG;XAPF,/\  P6G;PAPF,%`4  pG;W!@(#,h@\  P6G;hP\5hC:,:Xh*f9 xr G;XXd ItalicUnivers CondensedUnivers Condensed BoldUnivers Condensed Bold ItalicUn2$2 ?< FOR FCC RECORD ONLY  ?< $//Cox Cable Cleveland Area, Inc., Order, DA95755//$ $/76.922 Rates for Cable Programming Service tier/$ $/benchmark cable rates/$  b<  #o\  PCXP##p\  PCCP##o\  PCXP# + Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  b <Washington, D.C. 20554 ă  X-x` `  hh@hpp    X-x` `  hh@hpp   DA 95755  X -In the Matter of hh@) x` `  hh@)  X -Cox Cable Cleveland Area, Inc. hh@) CUID Nos.: x` `  hh@)  Xz -x` `  hh@)hOH0330 (City of Seven Hills)  Xc-x` `  hh@)hOH0863 (City of Broadview Heights)  XL-  hh@)  X5-Withdrawal of Rate Complaints hh@)hpp  X-Concerning Cable Programming hh@)  X-Service Rates` `  hh@) x` `  hh x  X-; ORDER ă x` `  Adopted: April 7, 1995 Released: April 12, 1995 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau:  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)  X!- I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a)x1. In each of the cases noted above, the local franchising authority (LFA) or another complainant filed a complaint with this Commission alleging that the prices charged by Cox Cable Cleveland Area, Inc. ("Operator") for cable programming service tier (CPS) services in its community were unreasonably high. These complaints, and the dates they were filed, are noted at Attachment A. Later, these complainants wrote to the Commission to withdraw their  X-CPS complaints.^V X'"-#Xj\  P6G;XP#э The dates of all withdrawal letters are noted in Attachment A. In both cases these are the only complete and timely complaints about CPS rates received by the Commission for these franchise areas. Our jurisdiction to regulate CPS rates arises with the filing of a valid complaint against those rates. We will allow the withdrawal of these complaints, and our review of Operator's filings will therefore be terminated. ";$y0*0*0*E$"Ԍ X-x2. Under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992,U Xy-#Xj\  P6G;XP#э Pub. L. No. 102385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992); Communications Act,  623(c), as  Xd-amended, 47 U.S.C.  543(c) (1993) (Cable Act of 1992). "#0*0*0*U#"Ԍ D and our rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission must review CPS prices upon the filing of a valid complaint. The filing of a valid complaint triggers an  X-obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of its CPS prices.g XK-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э 47 C.F.R.  76.956.g Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its prices through either a benchmark showing or a  X-costofservice showing.jy X-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э 47 C.F.R.  76.956(b).j In either case, the operator has the burden of demonstrating that its CPS prices are not unreasonable.  X_-x3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993._* X: -#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э Order in MM Docket No. 92266, Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, FCC 93372, 58 Fed. Reg. 41042 (Aug. 2, 1993).  XH-The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994.H X-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э See Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, MM Docket No. 92266, Second Order on Reconsideration, Fourth Report and Order, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 9 FCC  Xc-Rcd 4119 (1994) (Benchmark Order): 47 C.F.R.  76.922(b). Operators with valid CPS complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPS prices were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their prices were in compliance with the  X -revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward.   X-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э See Benchmark Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 4190, paras. 150152. Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing must complete and file FCC  X -Form 393.Y  X?-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э Id.Y In each case captioned above, the operator did file either an FCC Form 393 benchmark rate justification submission, or a cost of service rate justification submission. x  Xy- x4. This Commission has now received from the one and only complainant in each of the captioned communities a letter stating that it wishes to withdraw its CPS rate complaint against Operator. Under our rules, this Commission's authority to regulate CPS cable rates arises when a valid complaint against those rates is filed. Our mandate is to "protect subscribers of any cable system that is not subject to effective competition from rates that exceed the rates that would be charged if such a system were subject to effective  X-competition."  X#&-#Xj\  P6G;yoXP#э Conference Report on the Cable Act of 1992, at 62.  See also, Implementation of Sections of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate"'0*(("'" Regulation, MM Docket No. 92266, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed  Xy-Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993) (Rate Order) at 5669. While our rules forbid collusive agreements between operators and local"d 0*((" franchising authorities regarding forbearance from rate regulation, there is no evidence of such an agreement here. We will accordingly allow these complainants to withdraw their complaints. Because our review of the rate justification showings is predicated on the existence of a rate complaint, and Operator no longer faces a rate complaint, we are terminating our review of the filings made for both franchise areas covered by this Order.  X_-x5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that permission to withdraw the FCC Form 329 rate complaints against cable programming service rates in the abovenoted communities IS GRANTED. x6. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321. x x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhGregory J. Vogt x` `  hhDeputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau "8 0*((t"  X- Attachment A x  X-CPS Complaint Withdrawals  X_-CUID No. Communityhh@hComplaintComplaintxx 0(#(#X XH-x` `  hh@hFiledppWithdrawnxx 0(#(#X X1-x` `    X -OH0330 City of Seven Hillshh@h2/28/943/3/95  X -OH0863 City of Broadview Heights@h2/28/942/23/95xx