NOTICE


*************************************************************************
             

                         NOTICE


*************************************************************************

This document was originally prepared in Word Perfect.  

If the original document contained--

                    *  Footnotes
                    *  Boldface & Italics

--this information  is missing in this version

The document format (spacing, margins, tabs, etc.) is changed too.

If you need the complete document, download the Word Perfect version.

For information about downloading documents (FTP) see file pnmc5021.

File  pnmc5021 (.txt & .wp) is in directory \pub\Public_Notices\Miscellaneous.

*************************************************************************

                                Before the
                     FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C. 20554 
                                                                           

In the Matter of                   )              
                              )    CUID No. SC0163 (Winnsboro) 
Winnsboro Cablevision, Inc.        )
                              )    
Order Denying Jurisdiction              )

                                                  


                              Erratum   

                                                Released:  April 19, 1995  


     In Winnsboro Cablevision, Winnsboro, South Carolina, CUID No. SC0163, DA 95-
749 (Cab. Serv. Bur., released Apr. 7, 1995),  the Order incorrectly referred to a single
complaint when it should have referred to complaints.  Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Order
should therefore be corrected to read as follows:  

          1.  In this Order we dismiss  complaints against the price that the above-
     captioned operator ("Operator") was charging for its cable programming service
     ("CPS") tier in the community designated above on the ground that the complaints
     concern a rate that is outside the jurisdiction and authority of this Commission.  The
     Commission regulates rates for CPS only, and then only upon filing of a valid
     complaint.  Our review reveals that the complaints filed against Operator, while
     asserting that they challenge a CPS rate, challenge only the rate for basic service, not
     for CPS.  In particular, the record shows that Operator offered only a basic tier of
     service, and not a CPS tier, in this community.  The complaints therefore do not
     trigger the Commission's jurisdiction.

                    2.  Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 623(a)(2)(A) and (B)
     of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  543(a)(2)(A) and (B),
     that the complaints filed prior to May 15, 1994, against the cable programming
     service price charged by Operator in the community referenced in the caption ARE     
     DISMISSED.

                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION  
     


                         Meredith J. Jones
                         Chief, Cable Services Bureau