WPCOt 2BJ Z Courier3|xw RomanCG Times Bold@`7X@HP LaserJet 4_230_1HPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\oeX@2 6F v3|xCourierTimes New RomanHPLAS4SI.PRSx  @\iX@a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` 2=pRkk-a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  2votY a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` 2  o  a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h 22   Y 2 a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technical2d 4Ba1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   2"o1a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . 2 3oea8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx Yy<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#Pub. L. No. 102385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992) ("1992 Cable Act");  Yb-Communications Act,  623(c), as amended, 47 U.S.C.  543(c) (1993).#x6X@`7X@# and our rules implementing it, 47 C.F.R. Part 76, Subpart N, the Commission must review CPS prices upon the filing of a complete and timely complaint. The filing of a complete and timely complaint triggers an   obligation on behalf of the cable operator to file a justification of  X-its CPS prices.d> Y<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#47 C.F.R.  76.956.#x6X@`7X@#ю Under our rules, an operator may attempt to justify its prices through either a  X-benchmark showing or a costofservice showing.> YS <ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#47 C.F.R.  76.956(b)#x6X@`7X@#. In either case, the operator has the burden  Xv-of demonstrating that its CPS prices are not unreasonable.v> W <ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#Id.#x6X@`7X@#с  XH-x3. The Commission's original rate regulations took effect on September 1, 1993.CHw> Yp<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#Order in MM Docket No. 92266, Implementation of Sections of the Cable Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: Rate Regulation, FCC 93372, 58 Fed.  YB-Reg. 41042 (Aug. 2, 1993).#x6X@`7X@#C  X1-The Commission subsequently revised its rate regulations effective May 15, 1994.1 > Y<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)#x6X@`7X@#. Operators with complete and timely CPS complaints filed against them prior to May 15, 1994 must demonstrate that their CPS prices were in compliance with the Commission's initial rules from the time the complaint was filed through May 14, 1994, and that their prices  X -were in compliance with the revised rules from May 15, 1994 forward. > Y1<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#See Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4190, paras. 150152.#x6X@`7X@# Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing  X -must complete and file FCC Form 393. ^> W<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#Id.#x6X@`7X@#с Generally, to justify their prices for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing, operators must use the FCC Form  Xy-1200 series. y> Y9"<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(6); see also Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC  Y$#-Rcd at 4189 n.195.#x6X@`7X@# x4. TCI asserts that its monthly CPS price is justified by its benchmark filing because this price is less than the maximum permitted charge. Upon review, we have found no"4 0*0*0*"  X-apparent errors that would result in TCI's tier price exceeding its maximum permitted price.  $ 6E Yy<ԍ #Xw PE37}XP#This finding is based solely on the representations of TCI. Should information come to our attention that these representations were materially inaccurate, we reserve the right to take appropriate action. This Order is not to be construed as a finding that we have accepted as correct any specific entry, explanation or argument made by any party to this  Y-proceeding not specifically addressed herein.#x6X@`7X@#$  X-x5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the complaints referenced herein against the cable programming service price charged by TCI of Northern New Jersey, Inc. in the Township of Pequannock, New Jersey, CUID No. NJ0191; Township of Ridgewood Village, New Jersey, CUID No.NJ0195; the Borough of Bogota, New Jersey, CUID No. NJ0201; the Township of Teaneck, New Jersey, CUID No. NJ0204; and the City of Clifton, New Jersey, CUID No. NJ0219 ARE DENIED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gregory J. Vogt Deputy Chief, Cable Service Bureau x` `  hh@