WPCD 2BJ Z Courier#|xBoldCG TimesX@`7X@HP LaserJet 4_230_1HPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\oeX@2 6F v#|xCourierCourier BoldHPLAS4.PRS 4x  @\_)^X@a8DocumentgDocument Style StyleXX` `  ` 2=pRkk-a4DocumentgDocument Style Style . a6DocumentgDocument Style Style GX  a5DocumentgDocument Style Style }X(# a2DocumentgDocument Style Style<o   ?  A.  2votY a7DocumentgDocument Style StyleyXX` ` (#` BibliogrphyBibliography:X (# a1Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers:`S@ I.  X(# a2Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers C @` A. ` ` (#` 2  o  a3DocumentgDocument Style Style B b  ?  1.  a3Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers L! ` ` @P 1. ` `  (# a4Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers Uj` `  @ a. ` (# a5Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers _o` `  @h(1)  hh#(#h 22   Y 2 a6Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbersh` `  hh#@$(a) hh#((# a7Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumberspfJ` `  hh#(@*i) (h-(# a8Right ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersyW"3!` `  hh#(-@p/a) -pp2(#p Tech InitInitialize Technical Style. k I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) 1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technical2d 4Ba1DocumentgDocument Style Style\s0  zN8F I. ׃  a5TechnicalTechnical Document Style)WD (1) . a6TechnicalTechnical Document Style)D (a) . a2TechnicalTechnical Document Style<6  ?  A.   2"o1a3TechnicalTechnical Document Style9Wg  2  1.   a4TechnicalTechnical Document Style8bv{ 2  a.   a1TechnicalTechnical Document StyleF!<  ?  I.   a7TechnicalTechnical Document Style(@D i) . 2 3oea8TechnicalTechnical Document Style(D a) . Doc InitInitialize Document Stylez   0*0*0*  I. A. 1. a.(1)(a) i) a) I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentgPleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading PaperE!n    X X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:f 3E[K8h",tB^ f ^;C]ddCCCdCCCCddddddddddCCdxN`xoCCCddCdoYoYFdo8Co8odooYNCodddYdddd4dddddCddddddddo8dddddYYYYYN8N8N8N8oddddooooddpddddxodddXXddXddXdddddooL8doddNorddo8PdN8ppoddXXdpLoNpLodPDdopoopodXYXodoodddCddCCCWxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNdddCdUUddddddFddddFCCssd44ddzzddd~ooCsdF"dsd9dCCzCddoddCdYds`zUvdddCCCCzozoYNYYYN8YooYdYzzdzddYYzozzzNdzYzzzzCCdddddddzCzdYC\   pxtll\tll@\@\`L2sD>!Z"i~'K2^$(8<><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx-#Xj\  P6G;9XP#э#Xw PE37XP#xSee Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4190, paras. 150152. Operators attempting to justify their prices for the period prior to May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing must  Y -complete and file FCC Form 393. kt X-#Xj\  P6G;9XP#э#Xw PE37XP#xId.Ĉ Generally, to justify their prices for the period beginning May 15, 1994 through a benchmark showing, operators must use the FCC Form 1200  Yy-series. yt YG"-#Xj\  P6G;9XP#э#Xw PE37XP#x47 C.F.R.  76.922(b)(6); see also Second Order on Reconsideration, 9 FCC Rcd at 4189 n.195.  XK- f]  Procedural Matters   Y-x4.` ` The first complete and timely CPS complaint was completed and served on Warner Cable on October 12, 1993. The Commission received the complaint on October 20, 1993." 0*0*0*"Ԍ Y-ԙx5.` ` Warner Cable attempted to justify its CPS price through an FCC Form 393 filed on November 15, 1993. Warner Cable amended its justification on July 15, 1994, in response to a Cable Services Bureau Order citing common deficiencies observed in  Y-benchmark filings generally.Q t Y4-#Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP##Xw PE37XP#э#Xw PE37XP# #Xj\  P6G;9XP# Cable Operators' Rate Justification Filings, DA 94526, 9 FCC Rcd 7752 (Cab. Serv. Bur. 1994).Q  X- Discussion  x  Y_-x6.` ` Warner Cable asserts that for CUID No. VA0035, its monthly CPS tier price of $9.78 per subscriber is justified by its benchmark filing because it is less than the maximum permitted charge of $9.94 as calculated in the filing. Upon review of Warner Cable's Form 393, we have found no apparent errors that would result in Warner Cable's  Y -CPS tier price exceeding its maximum permitted price.   X -  Conclusions   Y -x7.` ` Upon review of the record herein, we conclude that Warner Cable's showing supports a CPS tier price of $9.78 per month (plus franchise fee) for the period from  Yy-October 20, 1993 to May 14, 1994 in CUID No. VA0035. xyet Y<  Ѝ#Xw PE37XP# This finding is based solely on the representations of Warner Cable listed in  Yx-paragraph 5, supra. Should information come to our attention that these representations  Yc-(including representations as to data regarding installations and customer equipment) were  YL-materially inaccurate, we reserve the right to take appropriate action. This Order is not to be construed as a finding that we have accepted as correct any specific entry, explanation or argument made by any party to this proceeding not specifically addressed herein.   YK-x8. ` ` Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321, that the October 12, 1993 complaint against the cable programming service price charged by Time Warner Cable of Harrisonburg in Harrisonburg, Virginia, CUID No. VA0035, IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN.  Y-" 0*0*0*"Ԍ Y-x9.` ` IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the benchmark filing submitted by Time Warner Cable of Harrrisonburg with respect to CUID No. VA0035, for the period of October 20, 1993 to May 14, 1994, justifies a price of $9.78 per month (plus franchise fee) for Warner Cable's cable programming service tier. x` `  hhFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION x` `  hhGregory J. Vogt x` `  hhDeputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau  ? <3f]#x6X@`7iX@#3ԗ f] #x6X@`7iX@# f]