FOR RECORD ONLY $//MO&O on Appeal of Tele-Media Co., Botetourt, VA, DA 95-339//$ $/76.944 Commission Review of Franchising Authority Decisions/$ $/76.938 Proprietary Information/$ Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 95-339 In the Matter of ) ) TELE-MEDIA COMPANY OF VIRGINIA ) ) Appeals of Denials of Requests for ) Confidentiality of the County of ) Botetourt, Virginia ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 23, 1995 Released: February 24, 1995 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 1. On February 24, 1994, and March 22, 1994, Tele-Media Company of Virginia ("Tele-Media") filed with the Commission appeals of denials by the County of Botetourt, Virginia ("County"), of Tele-Media's requests to keep confidential the information contained in Tele-Media's FCC Form 393, Cost of Service Showing and supplementary rate justification materials. Tele-Media's submissions were filed to justify Tele-Media's rates for basic cable television service. For the reasons set forth below, we deny Tele-Media's appeals. 2. Tele-Media submitted an FCC Form 393 and Cost of Service Showing to the County on or about January 26, 1994, in response to the County's notification that it was commencing basic cable rate regulation. At the same time, Tele-Media requested that none of the information contained in the rate justification be made routinely available for public inspection. Tele-Media contended that the material was confidential proprietary information, the public release of which may cause Tele-Media substantial competitive harm. On February 16, 1994, the County sent a letter to Tele-Media which, among other things, denied its request to keep the submission confidential. On February 24, 1994, Tele-Media filed an appeal of the County's decision with the Commission. In response to the County's request for further information, Tele-Media provided explanatory materials which supplemented its earlier rate justification and requested that such information also be kept confidential. In a letter dated March 16, 1994, the County again denied the request. On March 22, 1994, Tele-Media filed an appeal of this denial of the County. In both appeals, Tele-Media requests that the Commission review the County's denials of confidentiality. The County opposes the appeals. 3. With respect to requests for confidentiality of rate justification materials filed with the Commission, we have denied such requests where the cable operator has failed to satisfy its burden of demonstrating that disclosure is likely to cause substantial harm to its competitive position. Likewise, in this case, it appears that Tele-Media has made no allegations concerning the likelihood of competitive harm that would result if the materials are made available for public inspection. 4. Furthermore, Section 76.938 of the Commission's rules which governs proceedings of the type that are here involved, provides that with respect to information justified by the franchise authority as required to make a rate determination, public access to proprietary information shall be governed by applicable state or local law. There is no evidence before us that the County has not complied with such state or local laws or with the requirements of Section 76.938. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), that the appeals of the County's denial of confidentiality for the rate justification materials submitted by Tele-Media Company of Virginia ARE DENIED. This action is taken by the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, pursuant to authority delegated by 0.321 of the Commission's Rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau