FOR FCC RECORD ONLY $// Order, Cable Act of 1992, certification, DA 94-1381//$ $/ 600.623 Regulation of Rates/$ $/ 76.905 Standards for Effective Competition/$ $/ 76.906 Presumption of No Effective Competition/$ $/ 76.910 Franchising Authority Certification/$ $/ 76.911 Petition for Reconsideration/$ $/ 76.914 Revocation of Certification/$ Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION DA 94-1381 Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) TELESAT CABLEVISION, INC. ) ) Petition for Reconsideration ) ) of Certification of ) Citrus County, Fla. ) to Regulate Basic Cable Service Rates) (FCC Community ID No. FL0894) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 1, 1994 Released: December 2, 1994 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. On November 16, 1993, Telesat Cablevision, Inc. ("Telesat") filed a timely petition for reconsideration challenging the certification of Citrus County, Florida ("County") to regulate rates for basic cable service and associated equipment. On August 19, 1994, Telesat submitted its supplemental pleading in response to the Commission's July 29, 1994 Order. The County did not file an opposition to Telesat's petition. 2. Section 623(a)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, allows franchising authorities to become certified to regulate basic cable service rates of cable operators which are not subject to effective competition. For purposes of the initial request for certification, local franchising authorities may rely on a presumption that cable operators within their jurisdiction are not subject to effective competition unless they have actual knowledge to the contrary. Such certification becomes effective 30 days from the date of filing unless the Commission finds that the authority does not meet the statutory certification requirements. Cable operators may file petitions for reconsideration of the franchising authority's certification within 30 days of the date such certification becomes effective. Rate regulation is automatically stayed pending review of a timely filed petition for reconsideration alleging effective competition. II. DISCUSSION 3. Telesat argues that its cable system is subject to effective competition because it serves fewer than 30 per cent of the households in Citrus County, its franchise area. Telesat claims that it serves only 6,618 of the 36,241 households (that is, occupied housing units) within Citrus County, or 18.3 per cent of the households. Alternatively, Telesat states that its penetration rate is 16.1 per cent, still less than 30 per cent, if the total number of subscribers is adjusted downward to reflect the 789 non "full-time" or "vacation status" subscribers. As supporting documentation, Telesat provides a copy of the 1990 Census data which shows that there are 36,241 households in the franchise area. Telesat also submits a computer print-out with sufficient subscriber information to support its claim that it serves 6,618 subscribers in its franchise area. Finally, Telesat provides an affidavit under penalty of perjury by a responsible official certifying to the accuracy of the data included in the petition. 4. In the absence of a demonstration to the contrary, cable systems are presumed not to be subject to effective competition. The cable operator bears the burden of rebutting the presumption that effective competition does not exist with evidence that effective competition, as defined by Section 76.905 of the Commission's rules, is present within its franchise area. Telesat has met this burden. Telesat appropriately relied on data reflecting the number of households as required by our rules. Relying on this data, Telesat has submitted sufficient evidence demonstrating that its cable system serving its franchise area in Citrus County serves at the most 6,618 of the 36,241 households, or 18.3 per cent of the households within its franchise area. Thus, we find that Telesat's system serving Citrus County is subject to effective competition. Accordingly, its petition is granted. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for reconsideration filed by Telesat Cablevision, Inc. challenging the certification of Citrus County, Florida to regulate Telesat's basic service cable rates IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the certification of Citrus County to regulate the rates for basic cable service and associate equipment of Telesat Cablevision, Inc. IS RESCINDED. 7. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Meredith J. Jones Chief, Cable Services Bureau